ng the '--chuid' option of start-stop-daemon so
that I can run as a unprivileged user, and if I take that option away
then I don't get the zombies.
In my swatch configuration I'm doing an 'exec' action, so maybe that's
part of the problem.
If the problem is the &#x
I had lots of Zombie processes lastly on my debian sid box and can't
find the problem. Does somebody run into similar problems with wrong
preferences or something?
The following programs causing zombie processes:
Mozilla: 1.6-1
PSI: 0.9-2
MozillaFirebird (Nightly Build): Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux
Hello!
i jsut rebootet my machine with a standard 2.4.20-k7 and now i have ltos
of programs that crash and are unremovable since definitely
zombified
what's going wrong here?
--
ciao bboett
==
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://inforezo.u-st
~
Hello world,
Of late I'm getting spurious ppp entries shown by ifconfig. It happens
when a modem goes down. It might have been ppp3 but it comes up again as
pppx, where x is the next unused number and ppp3 becomes a zombie. Right
now I have two "zombies", shown here with a val
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 09:40:21PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > that's wrong ...
> > if the parent process would exit, then it's children would be inherited by
> > init, which would make a wait() upon the sigchld it will receive, when the
> > child exit
Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>
> > > Today I noticed the following:
...
> > > Under which circumstances does a process turn into a zombie? I assume
> > > this applies to UNIX in general.
> >
> > zombies are what is left from child processes when the paren
Bolan Meek wrote:
>
> Sven Burgener wrote:
> ...
> > Today I noticed the following:
> >
> > 15444 ? Z0:00 (cron )
> >
> > Under which circumstances does a process turn into a zombie? I assume
> > this applies to UNIX in general.
>
> zom
> > > Today I noticed the following:
> > >
> > > 15444 ? Z0:00 (cron )
> > >
> > > Under which circumstances does a process turn into a zombie? I assume
> > > this applies to UNIX in general.
> >
> > zombies are what is
> > Today I noticed the following:
> >
> > 15444 ? Z0:00 (cron )
> >
> > Under which circumstances does a process turn into a zombie? I assume
> > this applies to UNIX in general.
>
> zombies are what is left from child processes when the parents
Sven Burgener wrote:
...
> Today I noticed the following:
>
> 15444 ? Z0:00 (cron )
>
> Under which circumstances does a process turn into a zombie? I assume
> this applies to UNIX in general.
zombies are what is left from child processes when the parents thereof
do n
Hi all
Today I noticed the following:
15444 ? Z0:00 (cron )
Under which circumstances does a process turn into a zombie? I assume
this applies to UNIX in general.
Any pointers / references appreciated.
TIA
Sven
Hello,
Chris Brown:
> kill pid# did not work. Somewhere along the way the jobs attained the
> "zombie" status, and kill wouldn't touch them. I finally rebooted.
>
> Can someone explain what a zombie is and how to kill it?
The idea is that when a process dies, gets killed or just exits, its paren
On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 09:40:54PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
> > Mine looks okay; well, other than it being a man page and I find most man
> > pages
> > ugly to begin with, but only because I speak English instead of Developer
> > :)
>
> Have to agree with Brandon, it's complet
Package: procps
Version: 1:1.9.0-2
Severity: wishlist
On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 10:58:10PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> > BTW, has anyone else noticed that the manpage for ps(1) is uglier than sin?
> > Whose idea of nroff formatting is that?
>
> Mine looks okay; well, other than it being a man page a
George Bonser wrote:
>
> BTW, what does /var/log/exim/rejectlog give as a reason for rejecting the
> message?
>
> Support THING! (THing Is Not GNU). http://shorelink.com/~grep/THING.html
1999-03-26 22:57:34 refused relay (host reject) to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> H=westk03 (ni
On 27-Mar-99 George Bonser wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Pollywog wrote:
>
>> Are you using Exim?
>
> He must be, Adminstrative Prohibition is the standard Exim wave off
> message.
>
> George Bonser
>
> Support The THING -- http://shorelink.com/~grep/THING.html
>
I had the same problem with N
On 27-Mar-99 Kent West wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
>> Okay- new question. When I tried to send this message I got an error from
>> Netscape Messenger saying that I couldn't send it to Branden because the
>> Administrator had prohibited it. AFAIK, "I" am the Administrator, and I
>> don't
>> recall ev
Kent West wrote:
> Mine looks okay; well, other than it being a man page and I find most man
> pages
> ugly to begin with, but only because I speak English instead of Developer :)
Have to agree with Brandon, it's completly broken. There _is_ no nroff
formatting, they took a preformatted text fil
Kent West wrote:
> Okay- new question. When I tried to send this message I got an error from
> Netscape Messenger saying that I couldn't send it to Branden because the
> Administrator had prohibited it. AFAIK, "I" am the Administrator, and I don't
> recall ever prohibiting sending mail to anyone or
> BTW, has anyone else noticed that the manpage for ps(1) is uglier than sin?
> Whose idea of nroff formatting is that?
Mine looks okay; well, other than it being a man page and I find most man pages
ugly to begin with, but only because I speak English instead of Developer :)
(why don't they ever
On Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 01:21:49PM -0500, Chris Brown wrote:
> I had a few cpio scripts running in background, noticed an error with
> one of my scripts (it was recursive) and tried to stop it.
>
> kill pid# did not work. Somewhere along the way the jobs attained the
> "zombie" status, and kill
I had a few cpio scripts running in background, noticed an error with
one of my scripts (it was recursive) and tried to stop it.
kill pid# did not work. Somewhere along the way the jobs attained the
"zombie" status, and kill wouldn't touch them. I finally rebooted.
Can someone explain what a zo
I got some problem running Netscape 3.04 after I recompiled the kernel.
Simply Netscape hangs waiting for a netstat process which becomes zombie.
Searching on the net I found this message that was the answer:
> From "Lev Babiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have K5-100, and when I compiled
I had a line in my ~/.bash_profile like this:
export PATH=".:~/programs/bin:"$PATH":/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin"
... hashing it out fixed the netscape problem. It also runs from the
fvwm2 menu now, since I added:
export PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:~/bin
... to my ~/.
> "Tick" == The Tick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tick> Hello Debian Users List!, I seem to be having problems with
Tick> Netscape 3.01 spawning zombie 'netstat' processes, and thus
Tick> hanging. I was wondering if anybody knows a fix for this.
Tick> The only cause I can think
Hello Debian Users List!,
I seem to be having problems with Netscape 3.01 spawning zombie
'netstat' processes, and thus hanging. I was wondering if anybody knows a
fix for this. The only cause I can think of for this is that the Netscape
coders forgot to do a 'wait' in the parent process
Suddenly exmh seems to be producing zombie processes whenever I try to
reply to a message. Of course, I'm not able to make the reply.
Specifically, when I click on the Reply button (then on Reply to sender),
exmh shows this message:
Starting ASYNC exmh-async xterm -e vi ...
But exmh doesn't s
My system's been running for about a week. I've started to notice lots of
runq zombies (from smail, I guess):
FLAGS UID PID PPID PRI NI SIZE RSS WCHAN STA TTY TIME COMMAND
100040 0 10843 1 0 0 106848 11543d S ? 0:00 (runq)
100040 0 11188
28 matches
Mail list logo
