On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:14:36AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> A word of caution: as tempting as deduplication might be, avoid it. Unless
> you have significant RAM, and a fast RAID-0 SSD ZIL, I would advise against
> it. It causes massive performance problems, and the benefit isn't worth the
> c
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 05:52:49PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..another question is, what kinda performance enhanchement can
> zfs-fuse or zfsonlinux deliver, 5%, 50% or even 500%, compared
> to the best GPL file systems? And, no risk of vendor lock-in?
Performance is a multi-face
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:25:04AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> If it's a problem with the module, contact the module maintainers. If it's a
> problem with the kernel, unload the module, and contact the kernel
> maintainers. I don't see the problem.
Please read up on tainted mode. You can't just
load it. For that, the license
> > could be proprietarded.
>
> It's a problem if you ever want help if/when there's a bug or problem
> with the module, since the kernel will be marked 'tainted'.
..another question is, what kinda performance enhanchement can
zfs-
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:09:14AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> It's a problem if you ever want help if/when there's a bug or problem with the
> module, since the kernel will be marked 'tainted'.
If it's a problem with the module, contact the module maintainers. If it's a
problem with the kernel, u
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:27:36AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> And it's not a problem as a kernel module either, seeing as though it's the
> user who has to manually load it. For that, the license could be
> proprietarded.
It's a problem if you ever want help if/when there's a bug or problem wit
On Fri, 11 May 2012 09:27:36 -0600, Aaron wrote in message
<20120511152735.gn21...@eightyeight.xmission.com>:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 02:32:54PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > Yes that's what I was referring to. The CDDL is incompatible with
> > the GPL, but it is fine with the BSD license, so D
On Fri, 11 May 2012 14:32:54 +0100, Jon wrote in message
<20120511133254.GD1319@debian>:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 06:40:53PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..it is (at least in theory) possible to crack both GNU/Linux and
> > */kfreeBSD at the same time, and it is also possible to attack
> > GN
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 02:32:54PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> Yes that's what I was referring to. The CDDL is incompatible with the GPL, but
> it is fine with the BSD license, so Debian GNU/KFreeBSD doesn't have those
> problems.
And it's not a problem as a kernel module either, seeing as though
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 06:40:53PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..it is (at least in theory) possible to crack both GNU/Linux and
> */kfreeBSD at the same time, and it is also possible to attack
> GNU Hurd at the same time as the former 2, even if I agree with
> Microsoft FUD that by extension hol
On Thu, 10 May 2012 14:18:37 +0100, Lists wrote in message
<4fabc02d.8080...@coffeehabit.net>:
> On 09/05/2012 23:22, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >
> > ..exactly _what_ should it do for you?
> >
> >
> > ..after that, you'll be ready for the _how_.
>
> I know the what and why of what I'm doing. Why d
On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:42:36 +0100, Jon wrote in message
<20120510104236.GL8272@debian>:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:22:35AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2012 19:18:28 +0100, Jon wrote in message
> > <20120509181828.GG8272@debian>:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:07:51PM +
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 02:43:37PM +0100, Lists wrote:
> Is Time Slider a feature for ZFS or (Open)Solaris? It seems to be
> the latter.
It is a feature of ZFS native. It's available in the http://zfsonlinux.org
project.
--
. o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
. . o . o o o . o . o o .
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your thorough response.
On 10/05/2012 14:14, Aaron Toponce wrote:
a year or so, also with zero issues. In fact, if you use Time Slider with
frequent snapshots, it becomes trivial to restore data should corruption
occur.
Is Time Slider a feature for ZFS or (Open)Solaris? It
On 09/05/2012 19:18, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:07:51PM +0100, Lists wrote:
I'm looking at using ZFS for a box that will serve as a
storage/backup box. I'm aware of Debian/kFreeBSD, which seems to be
the best solution if I want to use Debian, but it does introduce
some limita
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:07:51PM +0100, Lists wrote:
> I'm looking at using ZFS for a box that will serve as a
> storage/backup box. I'm aware of Debian/kFreeBSD, which seems to be
> the best solution if I want to use Debian, but it does introduce
> some limitations, so I haven't decided on it (
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:22:35AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2012 19:18:28 +0100, Jon wrote in message
> <20120509181828.GG8272@debian>:
>
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:07:51PM +0100, Lists wrote:
> > > I'm looking at using ZFS for a box that will serve as a
> > > storage/backup
On Wed, 9 May 2012 19:18:28 +0100, Jon wrote in message
<20120509181828.GG8272@debian>:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:07:51PM +0100, Lists wrote:
> > I'm looking at using ZFS for a box that will serve as a
> > storage/backup box. I'm aware of Debian/kFreeBSD, which seems to be
..if you're parano
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:07:51PM +0100, Lists wrote:
> I'm looking at using ZFS for a box that will serve as a
> storage/backup box. I'm aware of Debian/kFreeBSD, which seems to be
> the best solution if I want to use Debian, but it does introduce
> some limitations, so I haven't decided on it (
Hi guys,
I'm looking at using ZFS for a box that will serve as a storage/backup
box. I'm aware of Debian/kFreeBSD, which seems to be the best solution
if I want to use Debian, but it does introduce some limitations, so I
haven't decided on it (yet).
There are two solutions for linux:
[1] z
20 matches
Mail list logo
