Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

That's not quite so. Someone said it's obvious that the list uses spamassassin, whereas in fact that's not so. I don't see headers inserted by Debian. Well if your right John, who do you think put these headers on your message? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-lists.debian.org_200

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

John Summerfield([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > David P James wrote: > > >On Thu 5 August 2004 20:49, John Summerfield wrote: > > > > > >>Matt Perry wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: > >>> > >>> > Why would anyone want to? >

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

David P James wrote: On Thu 5 August 2004 20:49, John Summerfield wrote: Matt Perry wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: Why would anyone want to? Why would anyone want to what? Retain old sa headers? The only ones valid for sorting are those injected by

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

On Thu 5 August 2004 20:49, John Summerfield wrote: > Matt Perry wrote: > >On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: > >>Why would anyone want to? > > > >Why would anyone want to what? > > Retain old sa headers? The only ones valid for sorting are those > injected by your own SA. Good grief - yo

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Matt Perry wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: Why would anyone want to? Why would anyone want to what? Retain old sa headers? The only ones valid for sorting are those injected by your own SA. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Chris Metzler wrote: > On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:28:53 +1000 > Paul Gear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Is this list not spamassassined? > > > Of course it is. The listmasters have posted here before, telling > us that something like 95% of all email incoming to their lists is > being rejected as

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Matt Perry wrote: On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: Edvard Majakari wrote: Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. The only s-a headers I see are mine. SA overwrites other SA headers. You can use the following in procmail to keep them: :0fhw: * ^X-Spam-Sta

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: > Edvard Majakari wrote: > > >Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. > > > > > The only s-a headers I see are mine. SA overwrites other SA headers. You can use the following in procmail to keep them: :0fhw: * ^X-Spam-Status: | formail -

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Paul Gear wrote: > >>Is this list not spamassassined? > > Debian is quite friendly towards spammers. Where did you get that idea? According to the list rules, spammers succeeding in getting a message to the list are billed $bignum per message per li

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:28:53 +1000 Paul Gear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this list not spamassassined? Of course it is. The listmasters have posted here before, telling us that something like 95% of all email incoming to their lists is being rejected as spam. You see 5-10 spam emails a day

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

John Summerfield said: > Edvard Majakari wrote: > >>Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. >> >> > The only s-a headers I see are mine. > > > -- > > Cheers > John > I don't run SpamAssasin here, and I have [..] X-Rc-Virus: 2004-07-20_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2004-07-19_01 X-Spam-Checker-Version:

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Edvard Majakari wrote: Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. The only s-a headers I see are mine. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Obviously it is, as you can check by the headers. However, I don't know if the Bayesian filter is trained. With training, you'd expect better accuracy. -- # Edvard Majakari Software Engineer # PGP PUBLIC KEY available Soli Deo Gloria! $_ = '456476617264204d616a616b6172692c20

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Paul Gear wrote: Is this list not spamassassined? Debian is quite friendly towards spammers. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

Is this list not spamassassined? -- Paul -- Did you know? If you use two dashes followed by a space as your signature separator, good email programs will chop them off automatically, reducing noise in email replies. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatu

you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver

It contains the exact same ingredients as regular viaggra, except that you pay much, much less. Each order includes specific usage instructions to ensure your safety. Stop procrastinating, and place your order today. You will not regret it. Earlene Heimbach http://Akdsdkvrrio.lowcostpill.com