Hi,
If I choose Preferences->Double Size gui from xmms, the xmms windows
goes black and I have to kill the xmms process to get xmms working
again. And this happens no matter which skin I choose. Is somebody else
experiencing this as well?
The system is Debian Sid running on 2.6.16-1-686 kernel.
John Halton wrote:
On 2/20/06, steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so: i decided to keep mplayer. is at least as good as the rest and
without humbug or fancy gui's. i like to *do* classic linux from the
command-line.
Should you develop a yearning for a "fancy gui" for mplayer, you can
alw
On 2/20/06, steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so: i decided to keep mplayer. is at least as good as the rest and
> without humbug or fancy gui's. i like to *do* classic linux from the
> command-line.
Should you develop a yearning for a "fancy gui" for mplayer, you can
always run gmplayer, which i
Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
steef escribe:
so: i decided to keep mplayer. is at least as good as the rest and
without humbug or fancy gui's. i like to *do* classic linux from the
command-line.
Then you could also try the combo mpg321, flac123 and vorbis-tools,
they fulfil my comma
steef escribe:
> so: i decided to keep mplayer. is at least as good as the rest and
> without humbug or fancy gui's. i like to *do* classic linux from the
> command-line.
Then you could also try the combo mpg321, flac123 and vorbis-tools,
they fulfil my command line needs.
Cordially, Ismael
--
mslinuz wrote:
Toshiro wrote:
I didn't know that xmms wasn't in development anymore. What is its
substitute? I've been using moc (Music On Console), already packaged in
Debian, which is able to play a quite impressive list of music formats.
It, together with easytag, are the "must haves" audio
Hi,
> BUT: PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU USE/KNOW A BETTER, MORE VERSATILE
> MUSICPLAYER!
You're talking about amaroK, aren't you ? :-D
Otherwise, I think the original poster is talking about a desktop
system, not production...
--
Pooly
Webzine Rock : http://www.w-fenec.org/
On 2/19/06, Toshiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using amarok and I think is the best!
Amarok is great as a player for your music collection (i.e. as an
equivalent to Windows Media Player or iTunes), but a bit bloated for
just playing a single MP3 file. XMMS is just the ticket for that.
Toshiro wrote:
I didn't know that xmms wasn't in development anymore. What is its
substitute? I've been using moc (Music On Console), already packaged in
Debian, which is able to play a quite impressive list of music formats.
It, together with easytag, are the "must haves" audio applic
>
> I didn't know that xmms wasn't in development anymore. What is its
> substitute? I've been using moc (Music On Console), already packaged in
> Debian, which is able to play a quite impressive list of music formats.
>
> It, together with easytag, are the "must haves" audio applications for
> tho
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Feb 19 09:08 -0600]:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Curt Howland wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Alex Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think our ideas of what constitutes a production system
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Curt Howland wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alex Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think our ideas of what constitutes a production system are
> > somewhat different.
>
> Indeed, a "production" system running Sid?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think our ideas of what constitutes a production system are
> somewhat different.
Indeed, a "production" system running Sid? [*shudder*]
Back on topic, I agree with Steef about XMMS. I use it myself and
* Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Feb 19 03:06 -0600]:
> On Feb 18 2006, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> [About xmms]
> > Despite the slight version difference, the changelog does show quite a
> > few fixes and improvements. Not bad for a package no longer
> > officially in development anymore.
>
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:48:29 -0300
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I didn't know that xmms wasn't in development anymore. What is its
> substitute? I've been using moc (Music On Console), already packaged in
> Debian, which is able to play a quite impressive list of music formats
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Feb 18 2006, Nate Bargmann wrote:
[About xmms]
Despite the slight version difference, the changelog does show quite a
few fixes and improvements. Not bad for a package no longer
officially in development anymore.
I didn't know that xmms wasn't in development an
On Feb 18 2006, Nate Bargmann wrote:
[About xmms]
> Despite the slight version difference, the changelog does show quite a
> few fixes and improvements. Not bad for a package no longer
> officially in development anymore.
I didn't know that xmms wasn't in development anymore. What is its
substitu
CCing you since you request off-list replies, but please do not exclude
the list in your Reply-To header.
Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:32, steef wrote:
> Alex Nordstrom wrote:
> > Even more puzzling than why one would consider the risk of
> > compromising a supposed production system for one minor
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
steef wrote:
hi all,
want to install the latest xmms,
Just curious, why?
H
<>
reg.,
steef
..mmm.have been using mplayer (compiled), so not the version
of the marillat-site, a long time. is somewhat buggy and quite good at
the same
Alex Nordstrom wrote:
Sunday, 19 February 2006 11:16, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Feb 18 16:21 -0600]:
steef wrote:
want to install the latest xmms,
Just curious, why?
Despite the slight version difference, the changelog doe
Sunday, 19 February 2006 11:16, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Feb 18 16:21 -0600]:
> > steef wrote:
> > > want to install the latest xmms,
> > Just curious, why?
>
> Despite the slight version difference, the changelog does show quite
> a few fixes and improveme
* Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Feb 18 16:21 -0600]:
> steef wrote:
> >hi all,
> >
> >want to install the latest xmms,
>
>
> Just curious, why?
Despite the slight version difference, the changelog does show quite a
few fixes and improvements. Not bad for a package no longer officia
steef wrote:
hi all,
want to install the latest xmms,
Just curious, why?
H
debian_way: so i need sid.
i am running sarge on one of my two hdś, as my production-system.
so i need to update from sarge to sid to install this latest xmms.
what are the risks for the os on my production_hd
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:07:01 +0100
steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> want to install the latest xmms, debian_way: so i need sid.
> i am running sarge on one of my two hdś, as my production-system.
>
> so i need to update from sarge to sid to install this latest xmms.
You don't need
hi all,
want to install the latest xmms, debian_way: so i need sid.
i am running sarge on one of my two hdś, as my production-system.
so i need to update from sarge to sid to install this latest xmms.
what are the risks for the os on my production_hd when i mix sarge up
with sid-packages by ch
25 matches
Mail list logo
