On 09-Jul-98 Shaleh wrote:
> At one time fltk was to be a XForms replacement. This changed. Darn
> shame. Seems the Windows support helped make it less X complaint.
I agree. I like the XForms look and feel. As it stands, most of my programs
will recompile under fltk. I just have a fe
On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 05:07:03PM -0700, The Gecko wrote:
> What is a "Free" graphics/windowing/x library out there?
Check out http://www.theoffice.net/guitool ; it lists numerous GUI
libraries and includes licensing information.
HTH,
Ray
--
Cyberspace, a final frontier. These are the voyages
it
goes to non-free. The rule here is if the lib, app, etc. it DFSG
compliant but requires a non-DFSG compliant piece it goes to contrib.
Obviously if it too is non-DFSG then it goes to non-free, no questions
asked.
At one time fltk was to be a XForms replacement. This changed. Darn
shame. See
What is a "Free" graphics/windowing/x library out there? I have a program
that's written for xforms that I'd like to port to something that can go in
main, not non-free. fltk won't work. I need the beable to plot graphs and
fltk doesn't implement the xyplot function group of xforms.
Come to thi
4 matches
Mail list logo
