On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 07:51:58PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.1908 +0200]:
> > which is sort of vague. the examples further down the manpage do
> > not make use of level= at all to provide a reference.
>
> Yes, I saw this.
>
martin f krafft schrieb:
> On 2007-07-10 07:37, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> I have reverted the patch and instead put a warning in place:
[snip]
> E: mdadm: levels should be either raid*, linear, or multipath.
> W: mdadm: falling back to emergency procedure in initramfs.
>
> This is a bett
also sprach Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.1908 +0200]:
> which is sort of vague. the examples further down the manpage do
> not make use of level= at all to provide a reference.
Yes, I saw this.
> I think the two items taken together rather strongly imply that if
> one us
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:59:39AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> On 2007-07-10 07:37, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > patch works. here is set -x output from a domU boot with new initramfs
>
> I have reverted the patch and instead put a warning in place:
>
> piper:~> sudo update-initramfs -u -
On 2007-07-10 07:37, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> patch works. here is set -x output from a domU boot with new initramfs
I have reverted the patch and instead put a warning in place:
piper:~> sudo update-initramfs -u -k all -t
#[314]
update-i
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:40:46AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.0834 +0200]:
> > Can I please see your mdadm.conf file and the generated initramfs?
> > Please put them somewhere where I can download them instead of
> > attaching them to
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:40:46AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.0834 +0200]:
> > Can I please see your mdadm.conf file and the generated initramfs?
> > Please put them somewhere where I can download them instead of
> > attaching them to
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:34:02AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.0750 +0200]:
> > it is indeed what is happening. the local-top/mdadm script sources
> > conf/md.conf. That file resets the value of MD_MODULES from stuff
> > like "ra
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.0834 +0200]:
> Can I please see your mdadm.conf file and the generated initramfs?
> Please put them somewhere where I can download them instead of
> attaching them to an email. If it turns out to be what I think it
> is, it should be a tri
also sprach Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.0750 +0200]:
> it is indeed what is happening. the local-top/mdadm script sources
> conf/md.conf. That file resets the value of MD_MODULES from stuff
> like "raid0 raid1..." to "0 1 5" and thus it bombs out on the
> boot.
This must
reviving an old thread as I have more to add...
ping martin krafft...
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 11:45:38AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.03.30.1920 +0200]:
> > Failure: failed to load Module 0 no such module
> > Failure: failed to load
martin, et al, sorry so long in getting back to this. Finally was in a
position to work on this a bit. so long sweet uptime.
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:07:21PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 11:45:38AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Andrew Sackville-W
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 11:45:38AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.03.30.1920 +0200]:
> > Failure: failed to load Module 0 no such module
> > Failure: failed to load Module 1 no such module
> > Failure: failed to load Module 5 no such modu
also sprach Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.03.30.1920 +0200]:
> Failure: failed to load Module 0 no such module
> Failure: failed to load Module 1 no such module
> Failure: failed to load Module 5 no such module
I don't even know what creates those messages.
> looks like it shoul
Hi guys, I've encountered a problem with my xen/raid setup.
My etch box has / on raid 1. When booting either 2.6.18-3 or -4 I get
an error when /scripts/local-top/mdadm runs: (paraphrasing)
Failure: failed to load Module 0 no such module
Failure: failed to load Module 1 no such module
Failure: fa
15 matches
Mail list logo
