On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:51:47AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 15 Jan 2020 at 08:00:50 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 08:16:17PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> > > On Debian 10 (Buster), running latex does not cause refresh of xdvi,
On Wed 15 Jan 2020 at 08:00:50 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 08:16:17PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> > On Debian 10 (Buster), running latex does not cause refresh of xdvi,
> > as I seem to recall that it does on Debian 8 and 9. Instead, I must
&
; > PDF renderings remaining unchanged while the other (same PDF) is
> > updated (with r) each time the source is reprocessed. xdvi would
> > make that near impossible.
>
> David, The technique sounds interesting; I should give it a try.
> Where is it documented? Must I start us
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 08:16:17PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> On Debian 10 (Buster), running latex does not cause refresh of xdvi,
> as I seem to recall that it does on Debian 8 and 9. Instead, I must
> click on the screen for refresh.
>
> Having read the xdvi man page, I t
source is reprocessed. xdvi would
make that near impossible.
David, The technique sounds interesting; I should give it a try.
Where is it documented? Must I start using fvwm?
On Tue 14 Jan 2020 at 20:16:17 (+), Russell L. Harris wrote:
> On Debian 10 (Buster), running latex does not cause refresh of xdvi,
> as I seem to recall that it does on Debian 8 and 9. Instead, I must
> click on the screen for refresh.
>
> Having read the xdvi man page, I t
On Debian 10 (Buster), running latex does not cause refresh of xdvi,
as I seem to recall that it does on Debian 8 and 9. Instead, I must
click on the screen for refresh.
Having read the xdvi man page, I think this could be corrected by
invoking:
xdvi -watchfile 1 &
when starting xdvi;
On Mon 22 Apr 2019 at 08:06:01 (+), rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On 2019.04.22 06:51, Bill Wood wrote:
>
> > Is there a reason not to use pdflatex? My workflow then is
> > = In emacs, save the doc foo.tex
> > = switch to a virtual terminal
> > = execute "pdflatex foo.tex" (as many times as ne
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 08:06:01AM +, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On 2019.04.22 06:51, Bill Wood wrote:
>
> >Is there a reason not to use pdflatex? My workflow then is
> >= In emacs, save the doc foo.tex
> >= switch to a virtual terminal
> >= execute "pdflatex foo.tex" (as many times as need
o the Emacs screen
Sometimes I simply need to glance briefly at the document in typeset
form, without printing it out on paper. For this, I:
= use Alt-TAB to switch to a terminal
= execute "latext foo.tex"
(if I am running latexmk with the -pcv option,
this occurs au
On Mon, 2019-04-22 at 05:17 +, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
. . .
> That saves three steps over my current procedure:
>
> = In Emacs, save the document
> = Switch to a virtual terminal
> = Execute "latex mydocument.tex"
> = Execute "latex mydocument.tex"
> = Execute "
On 2019.04.22 01:43, David Wright wrote:
... most people will be receiving a good proportion of documents as
PDF files, and so will have their printing system (like CUPS) set up
to handle them ... rather than the previously conventional
.tex→DVI→PS→PDF workflow.
On the average, I print only on
On Sun 21 Apr 2019 at 02:31:51 (-0500), rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On 2019.04.20 19:42, David Wright wrote:
> > How do you "switch" between them?
>
> Alt-TAB, multiple times if necessary. I switch back and forth between
> four or five windows: Emacs, dictionary, x
On Sun 21 Apr 2019 at 02:54:05 (-0500), rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On 2019.04.21 02:31, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> > On 2019.04.20 19:42, David Wright wrote:
> > > So you expect that visitors can print from PDFs but you print locally
> > > with PS. Any reason?
>
> Kindly forgive my deficiency
On 2019.04.21 02:31, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
On 2019.04.20 19:42, David Wright wrote:
So you expect that visitors can print from PDFs but you print locally
with PS. Any reason?
Kindly forgive my deficiency in the field of reading comprehension. I
finally understand your question.
I expe
ever I
read, I keep close at hand a red pen and a yellow high-lighter.
I constantly switch between the emacs screen and the xdvi screen as
I compose.
How do you "switch" between them?
Alt-TAB, multiple times if necessary. I switch back and forth between
four or five windows
shuffle the pages as necessary.
> I employ all manner of LaTeX markup, with sections, subsections,
> subsubsections, and paragraphs, and I use enumerated lists, bulleted
> lists, and footnotes. Keeping everything straight necessitates that I
> constantly switch between the emacs screen and
ested in an
> alternative to xdvi.
>
>
For 'latexmk -pvc', maybe you could create a $HOME/.latexmkrc file (if
you don't already have one)
$dvi_previewer = 'start xdvi -watchfile 1.5';
$ps_previewer = 'start gv --watch';
$pdf_previewer = 'star
nt file. I abandoned multiple dozens of
[snipped long, yet interesting and informative, story.]
>
> A few months ago I learned about latexmk, and used it
> successfully with the -pcv option in Debian 8; that worked
> well, providing all the output files I need, in addition to an
> xdvi
On 2019-04-20, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
>
>> But looking at just emacs, xdvi, and xterm running in separate
>> windows, I can't see any difference in their behaviour from what I
>> remember in the dim and distant past. The one unusual (for me)
>> property of x
lfest at a local university.
There a kindly soul showed me the rudiments of running Emacs and LaTeX,
together with magic of using xdvi to view the typeset document as
composition progressed, without the necessity of hardcopy.
The documents I compose range in size from two or three pages to
sing this problem, I would be interested in an
> alternative to xdvi.
There are many. I see a2ps, advi, apsfilter, atril, dvi2ps, evince and
okular. Not all these are viewers: eg, dvips converts to a PostScript
file for other viewers to use, and I think evince runs a converter
itself automatically.
On 2019.04.19 17:33, Étienne Mollier wrote:
...
It has this look and feel typical from monochrome X
graphical interfaces released in the 80's. Tasty ! :)
At least for diagnosing this problem, I would be interested in an
alternative to xdvi.
another desktop environment. LXDE ma
Good Day,
Lurking at this thread, I discovered xdvi was installed on my
machine, probably pulled by some texlive dependencies. I even
discovered a few old .dvi of mine, so give it a go out of
curiosity. It has this look and feel typical from monochrome X
graphical interfaces released in the 80
On 2019.04.17 13:20, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
I had forgotten about the concept of focus; I thank you for reminding
me, and for pointing me to the window manager.
After replacing the keyboard, it still appears that either xdvi is
broken, or that there is a strange interaction between xdvi
On 2019.04.17 12:38, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
You may be able to configure your window manager to disallow certain
kinds of windows from stealing focus.
I had forgotten about the concept of focus; I thank you for reminding
me, and for pointing me to the window manager. So many things in Debian
rlhar...@oplink.net writes:
>
>
> A month ago I was using latexmk with the same options on this machine.
> I seem to recall an occasional jump back to the xdvi window, but not
> the constant jumping back I was seeing today. So I think that the new
> Cherry keyboard must be the
does something similar. See if you have an
instance of that running in the background somewhere.
Yes; I was running latexmk. With the -pvc option the situation was
intolerable:
latexmk -pvc -dvi -pdf mydocument.tex
That is why I closed the xdvi window, but quickly discovered that the
process
ibed.
>
> I thank you, kind sir. I am aware that my expensive and not-very-old
> MX3850USB Cherry keyboard is not well-behaved; I shall return to my
> old $12 keyboard.
>
> However, I still question why the display kept returning to the xdvi
> window after I closed the wi
-very-old
MX3850USB Cherry keyboard is not well-behaved; I shall return to my old
$12 keyboard.
However, I still question why the display kept returning to the xdvi
window after I closed the window and had started no other instance of
xdvi. Could the reason be that I started xdvi in the
rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> my desktop system: amd64, Debian 9, xfce, Emacs 24, TeXLive, xdvi
>
> While using xdvi to view a LaTeX document being written with Emacs, the
> display keeps jumping from the Emacs window to the xdvi window.
>
> The behaviour persists even after
my desktop system: amd64, Debian 9, xfce, Emacs 24, TeXLive, xdvi
While using xdvi to view a LaTeX document being written with Emacs, the
display keeps jumping from the Emacs window to the xdvi window.
The behaviour persists even after the xdvi window is closed; while in
Emacs I suddenly am
Hi, here are two patches fixing the problem for me (with
LaTeXPlugin-0.1.3.1 and gedit-2.20.3) with (at least I suppose from the
initial code) two features more:
1) the line corresponding to the point clicked on in the dvi is
highlighted in the source, instead of just having the cursor on it;
2)
Hi,
Anyone had any success using reverse search with Gedit + LaTeXPlugin? I
use xdvi to view the DVI file.
Compiling to DVI with "Source Specials" seems to work OK. Xdvi comes up
and does not complain about missing Source Spesials when I CTRL
left-click in the DVI file. Howeve
Manu Hack wrote:
On Nov 2, 2007 9:53 PM, Raj Kiran Grandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Manu Hack wrote:
Hi,
I'm using sid and usually I don't need to configure the font in order
for xdvi to function properly. But now suddenly xdvi shows no font (I
have file with some graphics
Manu Hack wrote:
Hi,
I'm using sid and usually I don't need to configure the font in order
for xdvi to function properly. But now suddenly xdvi shows no font (I
have file with some graphics it can show the graphics somehow but no
words). So what should I do now? Thanks.
M
Hi,
I'm using sid and usually I don't need to configure the font in order
for xdvi to function properly. But now suddenly xdvi shows no font (I
have file with some graphics it can show the graphics somehow but no
words). So what should I do now? Thanks.
Manu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 02:36:44AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>
> Let's say I have the .tex file opened in vim+vim-latexsuite and .dvi
> file in xdvi opened side by side. Since I have a big screen, I can fit
> these two windows comfortably side by side. Now,
T wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:20:24 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
foreground. Is there any way to update the contents automatically even
if the xdvi window is not the active window?
why you want to do that?
Let's say I have the .tex file opened in vim+vim-latexsuit
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:20:24 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> foreground. Is there any way to update the contents automatically even
> if the xdvi window is not the active window?
why you want to do that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Using debian unstable, lets say I open a .dvi file using xdvi. Now I
modify the latex source, and compile it. But then the contents in the
xdvi window will not be changed until I bring xdvi window to the
foreground. Is there any way to update the contents automatically even
if the xdvi window
tex/hyperref/pdfmark.def)) (./test.aux)
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/nameref.sty) (./test.out) (./test.out)
Chapter 1.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] (./test.aux) )
Output written on test.dvi (5 pages, 4260 bytes).
Transcript written on test.log.
Now test.dvi will be produced.
$xdvi --version
x
perref/nameref.sty) (./test.out) (./test.out)
Chapter 1.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] (./test.aux) )
Output written on test.dvi (5 pages, 4260 bytes).
Transcript written on test.log.
Now test.dvi will be produced.
$xdvi --version
xdvik version 22.84.8 (Xaw toolkit)
Libraries: kpathsea version 3.4.5, T1lib v
readably with anti-aliasing under
xdvi.
I installed fonts using the KDE Control Centre font installer
before this problem arose.
-v, please. What kind of fonts did you install and why do you think
they affect the functioning of kdvi?
TrueType, Type1, 100dpi, 75dpi, Speedo, misc. This is the first time I
Folks,
I have upgraded to Debian unstable KDE 3.1.2-1 and teTeX 2.0.2-4.
A DVI file using default cmr fonts looks ragged and unreadable in kdvi
while it dislays clearly and readably with anti-aliasing under xdvi.
I installed fonts using the KDE Control Centre font installer before
this
make world
> has been working smoothly till the very end and no "Error:" strings
> has popped up in the log.
>
> BUT, when I've checked the
> /usr/share/texmf/bin/alphaev5-unknown-linux-gnu with "ls | wc -l" I've
> found 137 file instead of t
Hi all,
When I run texdoc I can read a page or so and then the system locks
solid. Xdvi (which texdoc calls) has the same problem, as does
Imagemagick which must call some common subroutine to xdvi. The only
way I have found to avoid the problem is to unzip the tex dvi file and
then read it
Anthony Campbell [debian-user] <07/05/02 16:03 +0100>:
> On 06 May 2002, Lars Jensen wrote:
> > How do I get xdvi to display included eps graphics? It used to do that,
> > but after a recent upgrade it has syopped to do so.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lars.
> >
On 06 May 2002, Lars Jensen wrote:
> How do I get xdvi to display included eps graphics? It used to do that,
> but after a recent upgrade it has syopped to do so.
>
> Thanks,
> Lars.
>
Funny - still shows them here (latest Woody version).
AC
--
Anthony Campbell - runnin
This is definitely an improvement, but all I get is still only the
boundary box. I used to see the whole picture by default when I
started up xdvi. (I didn't even need to hit the "View PS" button.)
Any ideas how to do this?
Thanks,
Lars.
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Paul Huygen wrote:
Lars Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I get xdvi to display included eps graphics? [..]
xdvi has a button that toggles the capacity to show the
postscript pictures (one button above the lowest button).
HTH,
Paul Huygen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
How do I get xdvi to display included eps graphics? It used to do that,
but after a recent upgrade it has syopped to do so.
Thanks,
Lars.
%%%
Lars Jensen, Truckee Meadows Community College, Reno NV 89512-3999.
Tel: 775.673.7113
Evening, all.
I just noticed some odd behavior from the xdvi in woody; it doesn't seem
to display small caps from postscript fonts correctly. The following
LaTeX file demonstrates the problem nicely:
%
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{palatino}
\begin{document}
THIS I
Hi everyone,
When I tried to use xdvi the other day, it gives me this warning
Mercury:~/school/rsty/proposal$ xdvi proposal.dvi
Warning: Unable to load any usable ISO8859-1 font
Warning: Missing charsets in String to FontSet conversion
Warning: Unable to load any usable fontset
/usr
Hi everyone,
When I tried to use xdvi the other day, it gives me this warning
Mercury:~/school/rsty/proposal$ xdvi proposal.dvi
Warning: Unable to load any usable ISO8859-1 font
Warning: Missing charsets in String to FontSet conversion
Warning: Unable to load any usable fontset
/usr
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:41:21AM +0200, Jan Ulrich Hasecke uttered:
> I had to alter "xdvi.bin" to "xdvi.real" in the xdvi Skript to make xdvi
> work. Is this a bug or does it depends on my configuration, which is
> AFAIK the default one coming with potato.
>
Jan Ulrich Hasecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>yesterday a new tetex-bin came up with a dist-upgrade following
>testing.
>
>I had to alter "xdvi.bin" to "xdvi.real" in the xdvi Skript to make xdvi
>work. Is this a bug or does it depends on my configuratio
Hi,
yesterday a new tetex-bin came up with a dist-upgrade following
testing.
I had to alter "xdvi.bin" to "xdvi.real" in the xdvi Skript to make xdvi
work. Is this a bug or does it depends on my configuration, which is
AFAIK the default one coming with potato.
Ciao!
juh
Hi everyone,
When I tried to use xdvi the other day, it gives me this warning
Mercury:~/school/rsty/proposal$ xdvi proposal.dvi
Warning: Unable to load any usable ISO8859-1 font
Warning: Missing charsets in String to FontSet conversion
Warning: Unable to load any usable fontset
/usr
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:40:34PM +0100, Angel Parra wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am using debian 2.2 and sometimes I use programs as Lyx, xemax, ...
> and all works fine, but when I use the xdvi to see some file, it doesn't
> work. The erros code is the same if I try it from
Hello!
I am using debian 2.2 and sometimes I use programs as Lyx, xemax, ...
and all works fine, but when I use the xdvi to see some file, it doesn't
work. The erros code is the same if I try it from the X-window server in
Win98 or from the Linux X-Window.
Error
Hello,
I think it should be in the file tetex-base in the /etc/X11/Xresources
directory.
I have to check this at home.
What I did here (at the office) is enter the line
XDvi*expert: true
in this tetex-base file and then I started xdvi and indeed, there were no
buttons.
Greetings,
Stefan
t; Stefan.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:39:08PM +0200, Daniel Reuter wrote:
> > > Hello Stefan,
> > >
> > > Seems to me more like a xdvi configuration problem. Are you sure, that you
> > > havn't specified the expert option either in y
h file should I have specified this expert mode?
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Stefan.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:39:08PM +0200, Daniel Reuter wrote:
> > Hello Stefan,
> >
> > Seems to me more like a xdvi configuration problem. Are you sure, that you
> >
me more like a xdvi configuration problem. Are you sure, that you
> havn't specified the expert option either in your X-resources or on the
> command line? Because that would make the buttons go away.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, stefan goeman wrote:
>
Hello Stefan,
Seems to me more like a xdvi configuration problem. Are you sure, that you
havn't specified the expert option either in your X-resources or on the
command line? Because that would make the buttons go away.
Regards,
Daniel
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, stefan goeman wrote:
&g
started xdvi. The
buttons (like Quit, Abort, Again, ...) are not present. I have no idea why and
what I can do about this.
Anybody any ideas??
P.S.: I already posted this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] So, sorry for
cross-posting this message.
Greetings,
Stefan Goeman
Ok, I had searched for bugs aggainst tetex-base and found none, but
xdvi is in tetex-bin! And I just found that there's a bug filed
against it already)! So, that was the problem.
J.
:: On 01 Oct 2000 22:36:59 -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello.
>
Hello.
It seems that the xdvi wrapper isn't working in this woody machine as
it was last week.
When called, it echoes the command line:
socrates$ xdvi
xdvi.bin -name xdvi
socrates$
So I have to use this:
socrates$ `xdvi`
And it works. Can this be related to the recent libc upgrade?
On 24 Sep 2000, Gernot Bauer wrote:
> I'm using debian 2.2 and when I start xdvi it always generates the fonts
> (although I looked at the file for many times and the fonts should be
> there...). Could that be a not-enough-rights-for-the-user-thing?
>
> Does anybody have a cl
|> I'm using debian 2.2 and when I start xdvi it always generates the
|> fonts (although I looked at the file for many times and the fonts
|> should be there...). Could that be a
|> not-enough-rights-for-the-user-thing?
Did you try running the `allneeded' script? This sc
I'm using debian 2.2 and when I start xdvi it always generates the fonts
(although I looked at the file for many times and the fonts should be
there...). Could that be a not-enough-rights-for-the-user-thing?
Does anybody have a clue?
Thanx,
Hi,
While using slink, I found that xdvi didn't display lines (table lines or
lines in maths functions such as fractions). The dvi files printed fine with
dvi2ps, just the display was up the creek. I got round the problem by using a
different dvi viewer (dvilx).
I recently rebuilt a system
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, William Park wrote:
> Try removing all the old .pk files, and run 'xdvi' again.
Thanks for your suggestion. I deleted them, after running xdvi new fonts
were generated but unfortunately that didn't fix the problem. Still the
text is almost unreadable.
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 02:36:44PM +1000, Tadeusz Bak wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> After upgrading the system from Debian2.0 to Debian2.1 (slink) something
> strange happend to the fonts in xdvi. The letters are colored a bit and
> look like doubled. Can someone please give me an advice wh
Hi all,
After upgrading the system from Debian2.0 to Debian2.1 (slink) something
strange happend to the fonts in xdvi. The letters are colored a bit and
look like doubled. Can someone please give me an advice what files should
I check? I use the standard Debian tetex. Thanks!
--
Tad
Hi all,
I'm trying to update my resume. I've run latex on the file with no
errors reported, but if I try to view the dvi file or make a postscript
file, I get a bunch of errors complaining about not being able to find
fonts. I've never used any fonts other than the default fonts that come
with the
Hello debianers,
Xdvi does not display any included eps files in the slinks version
(package tetex-bin, version 0.9.981113-2). IIRC this used to work with
the hamm distribution.
Starting any PostScript viewer (gs/gv/ghostscript) with the eps file
displays it correctly though
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 07:51:10 -0500 (EST)
From: John Kloss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Fredrik Ax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Fernando Tadeu C Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Debian User Mailing List
Subject: Re: Netscape fails
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Egon Schmid wrote:
> The problem is definitly bash 2.0. Try a real shell. This was an answer
> from a netscape person (name forgotten but can be found in the emacs
> manual)
>
> -Egon
I linked sh to ash, but then another script with #!/bin/sh on
first line broke. I took M
The problem is definitly bash 2.0. Try a real shell. This was an answer
from a netscape person (name forgotten but can be found in the emacs
manual)
-Egon
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> I have seen this problem before.
>
> > Thanks Michael for quick response.
>
> > Hmm...
I have seen this problem before.
> Thanks Michael for quick response.
> Hmm... will another shell give me still different error messages?
> I load ash from cdrom, and /bin/sh -> /bin/ash - and IT WORKS.
>
> A problem with shells seems more serious than one with application;
> should I repor
Michael Tempsch writes:
> >
> > I installed Netscape 4.04 (in a private directory) last year
> > and after fiddling with preferences (Edit -> preferences
> > ->Navigator->Applications) I was able to bring up XDVI when
> > I clicked on a .dvi file and a gho
Hello,
I installed Netscape 4.04 (in a private directory) last year
and after fiddling with preferences (Edit -> preferences
->Navigator->Applications) I was able to bring up XDVI when
I clicked on a .dvi file and a ghostview when I click on a .ps
file. I was running RedHat 4.02
> Hi, the size of xdvi doesn't scale. I can call it up with -geometry axb
> but that only controls the window size. The layout of the controls are
> too large and I can't get the lower part of the controls on my 800x600
> resolution screen without running a virtual deskto
Hi, the size of xdvi doesn't scale. I can call it up with -geometry axb
but that only controls the window size. The layout of the controls are
too large and I can't get the lower part of the controls on my 800x600
resolution screen without running a virtual desktop. Any suggestions?
Hi,
On 24-Nov-97 Walter Danielsen wrote:
>
>
>Hallo,
>
>wenn ich mit lyx einen Text mit deutschen Umlauten geschrieben habe und mit
>xdvi ausgeben will, werden die Umlaute nicht angezeigt. Ich hoffe, dass mir
>jemand angeben kann, was ich aendern muss, um die Umlaute dar
Hallo,
wenn ich mit lyx einen Text mit deutschen Umlauten geschrieben habe und mit
xdvi ausgeben will, werden die Umlaute nicht angezeigt. Ich hoffe, dass mir
jemand angeben kann, was ich aendern muss, um die Umlaute dargestellt zu
bekommen. Schon mal vielen Dank.
MfG
Walter Danielsen
As for the problems with \special{landscape} not implemented in xdvi,
I think that the answer is in the configuration of teTeX. Run texconfig
and check that you have properly configured xdvi.
Hope it helps
--
**
Miguel A. Arranz
Dpt. of Economics
Dale Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])$ xdvi
> /usr/X11R6/bin
> Error: XsraSelFile: can't get font 9x15
> Any ideas as to
>
> - Which 9x15 font it's looking for?
I assume the normal 9
Hi,
Recently, when I try to use xdvi, I get the following
error:
X Error of failed request: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap
parameter)
Major opcode of failed request: 54 (X_FreePixmap)
Resource id in failed request: 0x0
Serial number of failed request: 458
Current serial number in
This greets me whenever I try to power up xdvi. From memory it's supposed
to spit out the usage blerb.
---
([EMAIL PROTECTED])$ xdvi
/usr/X11R6/bin
Error: XsraSelFile: can't get font 9x15
---
When I first ran xdvi with an argument, Make
interface to the searching algorithm (e.g. in a
shell script).
>find them. I put the fonts where they were supposed to be ie in
>usr/lib/texmf/fonts/pk/... still it doesn't work.
Did you insert the mode here?
It is in /usr/X11R6/li
Hi,
Does anyone know how the path to the fonts works? I read the man page
from front to back and set the XDVIFONTS variable correctly, i think, but
it still refuses to find the fonts.
Is kpathsea built in? (ie do i have to install kpathsea.deb asa well) cos
it seems to call kpathsea to make th
94 matches
Mail list logo
