(This is being resent, as I have had to reconfigure my mail program to
get around internic's objection to the debian.org name)
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Aug 12, 1998 at 03:20:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Why you get different behaviour from xdm and start might
On Thu, Aug 13, 1998 at 12:50:47AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 03:20:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > no-run-xconsole
> > > obey-nologin
> > > allow-user-resources
> > > allow-user-modmap
> > > allow-user-xsession
>
On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 03:20:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > no-run-xconsole
> > obey-nologin
> > allow-user-resources
> > allow-user-modmap
> > allow-user-xsession
> > allow-failsafe
> > start-xdm
> > no-xdm-start-server
> >
> > However, xdm
On Wed, Aug 12, 1998 at 03:20:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Why you get different behaviour from xdm and start might be explained by
> this: There's a script /etc/X11/Xsession that claims to be run by both
> xdm and xinit (to which startx is a wrapper.) The script seems to look
> for
On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I just upgraded a bo machine to hamm from the official CDs;
> /etc/X11/config says
>
> # This file contains configuration flags for the X Window System.
> # For a description of the meanings of the flags, see
> # /usr/doc/X11/README.Debian
>
> no-ru
I just upgraded a bo machine to hamm from the official CDs;
/etc/X11/config says
# This file contains configuration flags for the X Window System.
# For a description of the meanings of the flags, see
# /usr/doc/X11/README.Debian
no-run-xconsole
obey-nologin
allow-user-resources
allow-user-modmap
6 matches
Mail list logo
