Re: xdm on beta-blockers (2)

2001-05-15 Thread Martin WHEELER
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > Brian Nelson wrote: > > Check the list archives. This exact question has come up several > > times on the list recently. Thanks for the tip. I don't subscribe regularly to debian-users, so had missed this. The 'new' behaviour of xdm -- combined with othe

Re: xdm on beta-blockers (2)

2001-05-15 Thread Joey Hess
Brian Nelson wrote: > Check the list archives. This exact question has come up several > times on the list recently. It's also fixed in unstable, and should be fixed in testing soon if it is not already. -- see shy jo

Re: xdm on beta-blockers (2)

2001-05-13 Thread Erik Steffl
Martin WHEELER wrote: > > Sorry; on previous, forgot to add: > > [Please cc any replies to author, as not subscribed to this list. > Thank you.] > > OK, I give up. > > Can anyone explain to me why xdm now takes a full 60 seconds t

Re: xdm on beta-blockers (2)

2001-05-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:59:51PM +0100, Martin WHEELER wrote: > Sorry; on previous, forgot to add: > > [Please cc any replies to author, as not subscribed to this list. > Thank you.] > > OK, I give up. > > Can anyone explain to m

xdm on beta-blockers (2)

2001-05-13 Thread Martin WHEELER
Sorry; on previous, forgot to add: [Please cc any replies to author, as not subscribed to this list. Thank you.] OK, I give up. Can anyone explain to me why xdm now takes a full 60 seconds to load and kick in? [Celeron 433, 64M, AT