On Tue, 15 May 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
> > Check the list archives. This exact question has come up several
> > times on the list recently.
Thanks for the tip. I don't subscribe regularly to debian-users, so had
missed this. The 'new' behaviour of xdm -- combined with othe
Brian Nelson wrote:
> Check the list archives. This exact question has come up several
> times on the list recently.
It's also fixed in unstable, and should be fixed in testing soon if it
is not already.
--
see shy jo
on Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:54:43PM +0100, Martin WHEELER ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> OK, I give up.
>
> Can anyone explain to me why xdm now takes a full 60 seconds to load and
> kick in?
> [Celeron 433, 64M, ATI Rage 128 16M, debian 2.2r3+testing, upgraded
> daily.]
>
> I'm flummoxed.
> It doe
Martin WHEELER wrote:
>
> Sorry; on previous, forgot to add:
>
> [Please cc any replies to author, as not subscribed to this list.
> Thank you.]
>
> OK, I give up.
>
> Can anyone explain to me why xdm now takes a full 60 seconds t
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:59:51PM +0100, Martin WHEELER wrote:
> Sorry; on previous, forgot to add:
>
> [Please cc any replies to author, as not subscribed to this list.
> Thank you.]
>
> OK, I give up.
>
> Can anyone explain to m
Sorry; on previous, forgot to add:
[Please cc any replies to author, as not subscribed to this list.
Thank you.]
OK, I give up.
Can anyone explain to me why xdm now takes a full 60 seconds to load and
kick in?
[Celeron 433, 64M, AT
OK, I give up.
Can anyone explain to me why xdm now takes a full 60 seconds to load and
kick in?
[Celeron 433, 64M, ATI Rage 128 16M, debian 2.2r3+testing, upgraded
daily.]
I'm flummoxed.
It doesn't appear to be a memory-swapping problem -- more of a
security-permissions related thing, as no-one
7 matches
Mail list logo
