Re: xconsole omnipresence and 100% CPU usage

2001-12-28 Thread Nori Heikkinen
on Fri, 28 Dec 2001 03:37:18PM -0500, Brian Nelson insinuated: > Well, that's not my only beef with WMaker. Also on that list: [...] > - won't save the omnipresent attribute across sessions (I had to hack what version are you running? i've got 0.41, and it saves that attribute fine ... <[EMA

Re: xconsole omnipresence and 100% CPU usage

2001-12-28 Thread Brian Nelson
"Karsten M. Self" writes: > on Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:17:46AM -0500, Noah Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:50:58AM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > > > > No, but it's a known bug in wmaker that's been there for a while. For > > > me, making any window omni

Re: xconsole omnipresence and 100% CPU usage

2001-12-28 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:17:46AM -0500, Noah Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:50:58AM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > > No, but it's a known bug in wmaker that's been there for a while. For > > me, making any window omnipresent will pin the cpu usage at 100%.

Re: xconsole omnipresence and 100% CPU usage

2001-12-28 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:50:58AM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > > No, but it's a known bug in wmaker that's been there for a while. For > me, making any window omnipresent will pin the cpu usage at 100%. I > gave up on wmaker and switched to KDE. > Actually, it is trivial to work around. Ther

Re: xconsole omnipresence and 100% CPU usage

2001-12-28 Thread Brian Nelson
wrenkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I really like Windowmaker, and the recent release of 0.80 has caused me > to give it another shot. the reason I left it was because it was a CPU > hog. Whenever I ran it, a few minutes after starting up it would shoot > to 30% CPU usage, and xfree68_s3 (The Tr

xconsole omnipresence and 100% CPU usage

2001-12-28 Thread wrenkin
I really like Windowmaker, and the recent release of 0.80 has caused me to give it another shot. the reason I left it was because it was a CPU hog. Whenever I ran it, a few minutes after starting up it would shoot to 30% CPU usage, and xfree68_s3 (The Trio64+ is not supported in Xfree 4.1.0) wou