Re: x11amp 0.9-beta1.1

1999-04-15 Thread Daniel J. Brosemer
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 10:29:32PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Actually, I'm basically running a glibc2 version of potato. :) (I > > compiled many of the potato stuff using the glibc2 in slink on a slink > > system). I'm still a little squeamish about glibc2.1 and I'm running > > pot

Re: x11amp 0.9-beta1.1

1999-04-15 Thread surak
gt; > So I definately am linking in gtk, gdk, and glib! > > hmm... now that I think of it, should this say something like '-lgtk-1.2'? > After all, the .so file is /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0. I'm trying it now. > If it doesn't work, I'll send this messag

Re: x11amp 0.9-beta1.1

1999-04-15 Thread Daniel J. Brosemer
lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm ../libx11amp/.libs/libx11amp.so -lglib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib So I definately am linking in gtk, gdk, and glib! hmm... now that I think of it, should this say something like '-lgtk-1.2'? After all, the .so file is /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2

Re: x11amp 0.9-beta1.1

1999-04-15 Thread surak
bably doesn't), Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm too impatient to wait for a deb of x11amp 0.9-beta1.1, so I tried to > compile it myself having had great success with the alpha versons. It > compiled without issue, but I've got some strange problems with the > binar

x11amp 0.9-beta1.1

1999-04-14 Thread Daniel J. Brosemer
I'm too impatient to wait for a deb of x11amp 0.9-beta1.1, so I tried to compile it myself having had great success with the alpha versons. It compiled without issue, but I've got some strange problems with the binary. Here's a cut & paste job. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~]$ x11amp