Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Micha Feigin
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:27:38 -0500 John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez writes: > > First, back in the early days, there were serious licensing issues (not > > so serious anymore, but they still exist) with Qt. > > I know of no licensing "issues" with Qt. It is distributed

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 05:27:38PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez writes: > > First, back in the early days, there were serious licensing issues (not > > so serious anymore, but they still exist) with Qt. > > I know of no licensing "issues" with Qt. It is distributed under the GPL

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread John Hasler
Roberto C. Sanchez writes: > First, back in the early days, there were serious licensing issues (not > so serious anymore, but they still exist) with Qt. I know of no licensing "issues" with Qt. It is distributed under the GPL. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Micha Feigin
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:45:23 -0400 Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Micha Feigin wrote: > > wxwidgets also has extensions for more then just widgets (networks, file > > system, etc.) and can work with opengl and there is a driver for plplot > > for doing plots. > > OK, this is getting over

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:45:23PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > Micha Feigin wrote: > > wxwidgets also has extensions for more then just widgets (networks, file > > system, etc.) and can work with opengl and there is a driver for plplot > > for doing plots. > > OK, this is getting over being just un

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 07:59:08PM +0100, Wulfy wrote: > Micha Feigin wrote: > >Also, AFAIK qt draws all it's own widgets (buttons, lists, etc.) itself > >while > >wxwidgets uses local ones (which is gtk under linux, native everywhere > >else). > Is gtk "native" to all Linux but KDE? Or is it ju

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 09:21:31PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote: > > Also, AFAIK qt draws all it's own widgets (buttons, lists, etc.) itself while > wxwidgets uses local ones (which is gtk under linux, native everywhere else). > wxwidgets on the other hand has the limitations that it can only due the

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Matej Cepl
Micha Feigin wrote: > wxwidgets also has extensions for more then just widgets (networks, file > system, etc.) and can work with opengl and there is a driver for plplot > for doing plots. OK, this is getting over being just uninformed partisan to real FUD -- before commenting on Qt get some inform

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Wulfy
Micha Feigin wrote: Also, AFAIK qt draws all it's own widgets (buttons, lists, etc.) itself while wxwidgets uses local ones (which is gtk under linux, native everywhere else). Is gtk "native" to all Linux but KDE? Or is it just "native" to GNOME? -- Blessings Wulfmann Wulf Credo: Respect the

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread David Baron
On Saturday 19 August 2006 05:51, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:13:29PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > If you want the "best" cross platform library, then I would argue that > > > it is wxWidgets. It has bindings for C++, Python, Java, Ruby an

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-19 Thread Micha Feigin
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:13:29 -0400 Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > If you want the "best" cross platform library, then I would argue that > > it is wxWidgets. It has bindings for C++, Python, Java, Ruby and > > probably other languages as well. It has the ad

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread Jiann-Ming Su
On 8/18/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While I do not doubt that Qt is a good toolkit, I think that it suffers (to a certain extent) from the same problem as Java GUIs. That is, they look out of place pretty much everywhere. Huh??? http://www.trolltech.com/images/products/

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:13:29PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > If you want the "best" cross platform library, then I would argue that > > it is wxWidgets. It has bindings for C++, Python, Java, Ruby and > > probably other languages as well. It has the advantage of sup

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread Matej Cepl
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > If you want the "best" cross platform library, then I would argue that > it is wxWidgets. It has bindings for C++, Python, Java, Ruby and > probably other languages as well. It has the advantage of supporting > something like a dozen different GUI toolkits and you get

Re: wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:59:48PM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote: > Hello > > I want write a cross platform user interface. I'm think about > "wxWidgets" and "gtkmm". What do you think about these libraries? What > do you recommend to use, maybe a another library ?? > If you want the "best" cr

wxWidgets versus gtkmm

2006-08-18 Thread gustavo halperin
Hello I want write a cross platform user interface. I'm think about "wxWidgets" and "gtkmm". What do you think about these libraries? What do you recommend to use, maybe a another library ?? Thank you, Gustavo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri