On Sat, 15 Oct 2016, Richard Owlett wrote:
> What does "obsolete" actually mean in this case?
"No longer applicable", either partially, or completely.
> I find it readable, but will it mislead me?
It might.
--
Henrique Holschuh
The title of
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/repository-howto/repository-howto
is _Debian Repository HOWTO (Obsolete Documentation)_ .
What does "obsolete" actually mean in this case?
Anything more than it was written > 10 years ago?
I find it readable, but will it mislead
On 2010-02-18 02:21 +0100, Clive McBarton wrote:
> Why does the current major update (kernel even!) not show up on
> http://www.debian.org/security/ ? Nor does it show up in the list
> "Security Advisories from 2010" http://www.debian.org/security/2010/ . I
> had to go to h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why does the current major update (kernel even!) not show up on
http://www.debian.org/security/ ? Nor does it show up in the list
"Security Advisories from 2010" http://www.debian.org/security/2010/ . I
had to go to http://lists.debian.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-05-14 04:39, Joey Hess wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>> I don't suppose that new version of (was it ssh) in Sid that warns of
>> connections with weak keys will be backported to Etch as a security fix?
>
> Yes, ssh in etch will be updated.
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> After keys are regenerated and all old keys are removed, would a reboot
> be in order to ensure that no apps are using old files that have been
> unlinked but still open?
If replacing a key for a daemon like ssh, or apache, or postfix, restart
the daemon. Some of these da
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 08:20:55PM +0200, Rody wrote:
>
> In response to the latest security issue with ssl / ssh, i updated my
> packages
> with the new fixed versions of ssl. However the steps to regenerate the keys
> are not available on:
> www.debian.org/security/key-rol
Joey Hess wrote:
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Here I ran /etc/init.d/ssh restart after purging the host keys, is that
enough or does dpkg-reconfigure do something extra that is necessary?
dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server generates any missing host keys, and
restarts ssh for you.
Yo
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Here I ran /etc/init.d/ssh restart after purging the host keys, is that
> enough or does dpkg-reconfigure do something extra that is necessary?
dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server generates any missing host keys, and
restarts ssh for you.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Joey Hess wrote:
> Ross Boylan wrote:
>
>> 2) cd /etc/ssh; invoke-rc.d ssh stop; rm *host*;
>> dpkg-reconfigure --default-priority openssh-server
>>
>
> There's no need to stop ssh. Just
> rm /etc/ssh/*host*; dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server
>
Here I ran /etc/init.d/ssh restart after p
Ross Boylan wrote:
> 2) cd /etc/ssh; invoke-rc.d ssh stop; rm *host*;
> dpkg-reconfigure --default-priority openssh-server
There's no need to stop ssh. Just
rm /etc/ssh/*host*; dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server
And then go fix all your ~/.authorized_keys files. And also openvpn and
SSL certificat
Rody wrote:
> In response to the latest security issue with ssl / ssh, i updated my
> packages
> with the new fixed versions of ssl. However the steps to regenerate the keys
> are not available on:
> www.debian.org/security/key-rollover/
> as the security advisory tells
Adrian Levi wrote:
> 2008/5/14 Rody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> In response to the latest security issue with ssl / ssh, i updated my
>> packages
>> with the new fixed versions of ssl. However the steps to regenerate the keys
>> are not available on:
>
2008/5/14 Rody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> In response to the latest security issue with ssl / ssh, i updated my
> packages
> with the new fixed versions of ssl. However the steps to regenerate the keys
> are not available on:
> www.debian.org/security/key-rollover/
>
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 08:20:55PM +0200, Rody wrote:
>
> In response to the latest security issue with ssl / ssh, i updated my
> packages
> with the new fixed versions of ssl. However the steps to regenerate the keys
> are not available on:
> www.debian.org/security/key-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/08 14:27, Ross Boylan wrote:
[snip]
> 1) regenerated keys in ~/.ssh, including tossing my old authorized keys
> from other systems. I put the new key on a diskette to take to my other
What's that? Is it like a little Frisbee-shaped thumb dr
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 20:20 +0200, Rody wrote:
> In response to the latest security issue with ssl / ssh, i updated my
> packages
> with the new fixed versions of ssl. However the steps to regenerate the keys
> are not available on:
> www.debian.org/security/key-rollover/
&g
In response to the latest security issue with ssl / ssh, i updated my packages
with the new fixed versions of ssl. However the steps to regenerate the keys
are not available on:
www.debian.org/security/key-rollover/
as the security advisory tells us.
According to google, the page did exist 4
Paul Scott wrote:
ss11223 wrote:
That's an oddity. Have you tried http://www.us.debian.org/ ?
That works! I also *can't* get to www.debian.org from a Windoze box on
this LAN.
I'm checking to see if anyone at my ISP is having trouble.
I wrote my ISP and the problem w
ss11223 wrote:
That's an oddity. Have you tried http://www.us.debian.org/ ?
That works! I also *can't* get to www.debian.org from a Windoze box on
this LAN.
I'm checking to see if anyone at my ISP is having trouble.
Thanks,
Paul
Could this be a DNS problem?
> > That's an oddity. Have you tried http://www.us.debian.org/ ?
> >
> That works! I also *can't* get to www.debian.org from a Windoze box on
> this LAN.
>
> I'm checking to see if anyone at my ISP is having trouble.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
Alan Ianson wrote:
On Mon January 8 2007 08:57, Paul Scott wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:33:11AM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble getting to www.debian.org? I can get to
mirrors to install packages but not to the web site
On Mon January 8 2007 08:57, Paul Scott wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:33:11AM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> >> Is anyone else having trouble getting to www.debian.org? I can get to
> >> mirrors to install packages but not to the web
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:33:11AM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble getting to www.debian.org? I can get to
mirrors to install packages but not to the web site.
works fine in Spokane WA
Can anyone think of what protocol my
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:33:11AM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> Is anyone else having trouble getting to www.debian.org? I can get to
> mirrors to install packages but not to the web site.
works fine in Spokane WA
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:33:11AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Scott wrote:
> Is anyone else having trouble getting to www.debian.org? I can get to
> mirrors to install packages but not to the web site.
It's working just fine from Toronto.
--
Rega
On (08/01/07 02:33), Paul Scott wrote:
> mirrors to install packages but not to the web site.
Works fine here.
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
Is anyone else having trouble getting to www.debian.org? I can get to
mirrors to install packages but not to the web site.
Paul Scott
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d do an "aptitude update."
One example would be:
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
Of course you'll get better performance picking a closer mirror...
www.debian.org/mirror/list
--
Christopher Nelson -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On 07/14/2006 12:45 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to install x-window-system on Sarge 31r1. Will not install due
to broken dependency -- missing xprt-xprintorg. I am using
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
in my sources.list file. All my other dependenc
Trying to install x-window-system on Sarge 31r1. Will not install due
to broken dependency -- missing xprt-xprintorg. I am using
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
in my sources.list file. All my other dependencies look fine.
Help would be most appreciated.
Jef
On Monday 29 May 2006 06:57, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at www.debian.org/users and wondered if these users are
> still using Debian or if it's more of a historical tale.
No. This list is being actively maintained. You can add yourself to the list
(
Hi,
I was looking at www.debian.org/users and wondered if these users are
still using Debian or if it's more of a historical tale.
Does anyone care about this page and when last was it updated?
malebo
On 8/25/05, Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:06:54AM +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote:
> > Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
> > reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah,
> >
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:37:57 +0100
Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:06:54AM +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote:
> > Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
> > reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:06:54AM +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote:
>
> Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
> reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah, wait,
> they appear to be the same machine 194.109.137.218. hardware pro
ing the debian website? I can't
> > reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah,
> > wait, they appear to be the same machine 194.109.137.218. hardware
> > problem? scheduled downtime?).
>
> I was going to ask you to "post a new message for a ne
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:06:54AM +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote:
> Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
> reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah,
> wait, they appear to be the same machine 194.109.137.218. hardware
> pr
Seems to be resolved. I should have waited a bit longer before posting
this :-)
Nico
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 09:06 +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote:
> Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
> reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah, w
Nico De Ranter wrote:
Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah, wait,
they appear to be the same machine 194.109.137.218. hardware problem?
scheduled downtime?).
Nico
Yes.
Just tried to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
> >> reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah,
> >> wait,
> >> they appear to be the same machine 194.109.1
On 25 Aug 2005, at 9:20 AM, L.V.Gandhi wrote:
On 8/25/05, Nico De Ranter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah,
wait,
they appear to be the s
On 8/25/05, Nico De Ranter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
> reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah, wait,
> they appear to be the same machine 194.109.137.218. hardware proble
Is anybody else having problems reaching the debian website? I can't
reach www.debian.org or security.debian.org. DNS still works (ah, wait,
they appear to be the same machine 194.109.137.218. hardware problem?
scheduled downtime?).
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 18:20:20 -0700,
"Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 at 01:01 GMT, Arnt Karlsen penned:
> > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:55:52 -0700, "Monique Y. Herman"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
20
>>> > There should be an official announcement one way or the other
>>> > soon.
>>>=20 Yes, within the next hour.
>>
>> ..www.debian.org and debian.org are both up, but still no statement
>> at=20 Fri Nov 21 14:27:28 CET 2003.
>
> I guess you don&
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 at 01:01 GMT, Arnt Karlsen penned:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:55:52 -0700, "Monique Y. Herman"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> -- monique PLEASE don't CC me. Please. Pretty please with sugar on
>> top. Whatever it takes, just don't CC me! I'
monique writes:
> There hasn't been an announcement made about *when* exactly the machines
> were compromised, has there?
Thursday or Friday.
> Then again, the belief seems to be that actual packages haven't been
> compromised, so maybe it doesn't matter ...
The archive was not compromised.
--
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 at 18:21 GMT, Vineet Kumar penned:
>
>
> aptitude keeps such a log in /var/log/aptitude ... if you use
> aptitude, that is.
>
Aptitude isn't the only thing I use, but I think it's the only thing
I've used lately.
There hasn't been an announcement made about *when* exactly t
ial announcement one way or the other soon.
> >>
> >> Yes, within the next hour.
> >
> > ..www.debian.org and debian.org are both up, but still no statement at
> > Fri Nov 21 14:27:28 CET 2003.
>
> I guess you don't subscribe to debian-announce?
I gu
Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 02:00:35 -0800,
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> > There should be an official announcement one way or the other soon.
>>
>> Yes, within the next hour.
>
> ..w
year.
Peruse the archives. However, I'll give you the cliff notes:
It's against the CoC of these lists to CC unless the poser expressly requests
it. See bullet #9 at <http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/> under the heading
"Code of Conduct".
All other considerations as
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:55:52 -0700,
"Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> --
> monique
> PLEASE don't CC me. Please. Pretty please with sugar on top.
> Whatever it takes, just don't CC me! I'm already subscribed!!
..another way is use procmail to dr
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 19:31, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2003 11:46, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > I haven't found yet a way to gather information about the date I installed
> > (or even uninstalled) Debian packages in the Debian package
> > management system ...
> >
> > I h
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 11:46, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> I haven't found yet a way to gather information about the date I installed
> (or even uninstalled) Debian packages in the Debian package
> management system ...
>
> I help myself with this line:
>
> ls -lt --time=use /var/cache/apt/ar
* Monique Y. Herman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031126 07:18]:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 at 11:53 GMT, Cristi Banciu penned:
> > http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
>
> So, is there some sort of history log kept on my machine that tells me
> when I last updated what?
aptitude
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lukas Ruf wrote:
>
>>>Cristi Banciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-21 13:17]:
>>>
>>>http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
>>>
>>>
>>
>>after having read: I have run upgrades on various machines this
>>morning.
>>
>>Is there any ch
At 17:46 Uhr +0100 26.11.2003, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
ls -lt --time=use /var/cache/apt/archives|less
ls -lrt --time=ctime /var/cache/apt/archives
works better (at least if the filesystem is mounted noatime).
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 17:55, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 at 11:53 GMT, Cristi Banciu penned:
> > http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
> >
> >
>
> So, is there some sort of history log kept on my machine that tells me
> when I last updated what?
>
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:55:52AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 at 11:53 GMT, Cristi Banciu penned:
> > http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
> >
> >
>
> So, is there some sort of history log kept on my machine that tells me
> when I last upd
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 at 11:53 GMT, Cristi Banciu penned:
> http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
>
>
So, is there some sort of history log kept on my machine that tells me
when I last updated what?
I think the only thing I've done in the last couple of days is *remov
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:22:27PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> > Cristi Banciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-21 13:17]:
> >
> > http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
> >
>
> after having read: I have run upgrades on various machines this
> morning.
>
> Is there any chanc
Replying to the message sent by Lukas Ruf on Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:44:21
+0100, received at 15:58:11 on 21/11/2003. Lukas Ruf wrote:
>
>If I may kindly ask you to set the line-length to 72 characters...
Done
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 21 November 2003 09:33, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> Maybe the first thing you should do is to downgrade all the upgraded
> packages to stable/woody. Backup critical data and wait! Let us hear
> the extent of damage and then proceed for
On 21 Nov 2003, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 02:39:10 -0800, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Christ, now I'm really getting scared:
> >chkrootkit reports:
> >Checking `lkm'... You have 4 process hidden for ps command
> >Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
>
> chkrootkit is we
Lukas Ruf wrote:
Cristi Banciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-21 13:17]:
http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
after having read: I have run upgrades on various machines this
morning.
Is there any chance that these machines have been compromised too?
From the
> Ken Gilmour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-21 14:40]:
>
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:22:27 +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> >> Cristi Banciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-21
> >>13:17]:
> >>
> >>
> >> http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
> >>
> >
> > after having read: I have run
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:22:27 +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
>> Cristi Banciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-21 13:17]:
>>
>>
>> http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
>>
>
> after having read: I have run upgrades on various machines this
> morning.
>
> Is there any chance that th
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:22:27PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> > Cristi Banciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-21 13:17]:
> >
> > http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
> >
>
> after having read: I have run upgrades on various machines this
> morning.
>
> Is there any chanc
rote:
> > > on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:07:20PM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat
> > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > Jerome posts:
> > > >
> > > > > > What happens to www.debian.org ?
> > > >
> > > > Someone has cracked
> Cristi Banciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-21 13:17]:
>
> http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
>
after having read: I have run upgrades on various machines this
morning.
Is there any chance that these machines have been compromised too?
Thanks!
wbr,
Lukas
--
Luk
http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:09:13 -0500
Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul William wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 19:54, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> >
> >>Hello All,
> >>
> >>What happens to www.debian.org ?
> >
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:39:10AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:52:43PM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> > Tom posts:
> >
> > >> deinstalled due to missing dependencies, but the 2nd time through
> > >> they work. (This time, it was most of the qt3*-dev and gtk2*-dev and
> >
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 02:39:10 -0800, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Christ, now I'm really getting scared:
>chkrootkit reports:
>Checking `lkm'... You have 4 process hidden for ps command
>Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
chkrootkit is well known to mis-report a non-existing LKM trojan o
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:39:10AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:52:43PM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> > Tom posts:
> >
> > >> deinstalled due to missing dependencies, but the 2nd time through
> > >> they work. (This time, it was most of the qt3*-dev and gtk2*-dev and
> >
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:52:43PM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> Tom posts:
>
> >> deinstalled due to missing dependencies, but the 2nd time through
> >> they work. (This time, it was most of the qt3*-dev and gtk2*-dev and
> >> relateds.)
>
> When did you notice this ?
>
> When I insta
Tom posts:
>> deinstalled due to missing dependencies, but the 2nd time through
>> they work. (This time, it was most of the qt3*-dev and gtk2*-dev and
>> relateds.)
When did you notice this ?
When I installed the procps of `sid' v3.x.x, chkrootkit was informing
that I had a LKM worm
"Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:30:36AM -0800, Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:07:20PM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> wrote:
>> > Jerome posts:
>
Paul William wrote:
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 19:54, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello All,
What happens to www.debian.org ?
Seems to be down but http://debian.org/ is working. This means it is,
IMHO, *probably* a DNS problem
$ ping -c 2 debian.org
PING debian.org (141.76.2.5): 56 data bytes
$ ping -c
Paul William wrote:
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 19:54, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello All,
What happens to www.debian.org ?
Seems to be down but http://debian.org/ is working. This means it is,
IMHO, *probably* a DNS problem
Correct !
Nevertheless,
I have still trouble with apt-get !
--
To
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project.
Uh, where did you get this information from?
--
Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:30:36AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:07:20PM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Jerome posts:
> >
> > >> What happens to www.debian.org ?
> >
> > Someone has cracked all the serv
on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:30:36AM -0800, Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:07:20PM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Jerome posts:
> >
> > >> What happens to www.debian.org ?
> >
> > Someone has
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 19:54, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> What happens to www.debian.org ?
Seems to be down but http://debian.org/ is working. This means it is,
IMHO, *probably* a DNS problem
--
.''`. Paul William
: :' :Debian admin and user
`. `&#
on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:07:20PM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Jerome posts:
>
> >> What happens to www.debian.org ?
>
> Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There has
> been a severe security mishap and guys shou
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 04:09:26PM -0400, eCLe wrote:
> Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> >Jerome posts:
> >>>What happens to www.debian.org ?
> >Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There has
> >been a severe security mishap and g
Hello
Roberto Sanchez (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
>> Jerome posts:
>>
>>>>What happens to www.debian.org ?
>>
>> Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There
>> has been a severe security
Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
>> Jerome posts:
>>
>>>>What happens to www.debian.org ?
>> Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There
>> has
>> been a severe security mishap a
Roberto posts:
>> also downloaded chkrootkit from the upstream site, and it came out
>> clean. Should I worry yet?
Maybe the first thing you should do is to downgrade all the upgraded
packages to stable/woody. Backup critical data and wait! Let us hear
the extent of damage and then p
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 09:37, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> Jerome posts:
>
> >> What happens to www.debian.org ?
>
> Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There has
> been a severe security mishap and guys should uninstall all stuff
> downlo
Raghavendra Bhat írta:
Jerome posts:
What happens to www.debian.org ?
Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There has
been a severe security mishap and guys should uninstall all stuff
downloaded and installed in the past 2 days. Please do not apt-get
Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Jerome posts:
What happens to www.debian.org ?
Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There has
been a severe security mishap and guys should uninstall all stuff
downloaded and installed in the past 2 days. Please do not apt-get
Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Jerome posts:
What happens to www.debian.org ?
Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There has
been a severe security mishap and guys should uninstall all stuff
downloaded and installed in the past 2 days. Please do not apt
I suspected something like that:
this is not a good point for Debian.
Thanks,
Jerome
Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
Jerome posts:
What happens to www.debian.org ?
Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There has
been a severe security mishap and guys should uninstall all
* Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-21 18:25]:
> Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> >Hello All,
> >
> >What happens to www.debian.org ?
> >
> >
>
> Dan't know. I can't get to it either.
Don't know if it's a related problem, but
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello All,
What happens to www.debian.org ?
I dont know what happend to the page I cannot be connected :\
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jerome posts:
>> What happens to www.debian.org ?
Someone has cracked all the servers of the Debian Project. There has
been a severe security mishap and guys should uninstall all stuff
downloaded and installed in the past 2 days. Please do not apt-get
anything right now!
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello All,
What happens to www.debian.org ?
Dan't know. I can't get to it either.
-Roberto
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello All,
What happens to www.debian.org ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
