Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-05 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 05/10/11 15:07, Harry Putnam wrote: > Scott Ferguson writes: > > > [...] > >>> I thought fonts were to be found at: >>> /usr/share/fonts/ Mine are there: >> They are... other possible locations include:- >> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts >> /usr/local/share/fonts >> /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfon

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-04 Thread Harry Putnam
Scott Ferguson writes: [...] >> I thought fonts were to be found at: >> /usr/share/fonts/ Mine are there: > They are... other possible locations include:- > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts > /usr/local/share/fonts > /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType > ~/.fonts > > Do you not have l

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-03 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 04/10/11 11:29, Harry Putnam wrote: > Scott Ferguson writes: > >> if you get error codes please post - if screen refreshes (without >> printing errors) but doesn't seem to pan, try Ctrl++ or Ctrl+- > > xrandr --output default --dryrun --mode 1440x900 --panning 1680x1050 > warning: output de

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-03 Thread Harry Putnam
hat problem you are having with threading. > > This is "wrestling with xrandr", you started with a thread called > "virtual resolution of desktop" Exactly. The other thread was about Virtual resolution in general. This thread is about xrandr specifically. Hence the su

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:47:26 -0500, Harry wrote in message <87sjncogs1@newsguy.com>: > Scott Ferguson writes: > > NOTE: Correction to monitor native resolution posted in OP > Native resolution: 1920 x 1200 (I previously said 1900x1280) ..you wanna try it at the native resolution. ;o) If

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-03 Thread Darac Marjal
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 03:09:24PM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > Lisi writes: > > > On Saturday 01 October 2011 16:47:26 Harry Putnam wrote: > >> Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid > >> > >> (Installed from new 11.4 install disc (the small one)) > > > > 11.4??? Wheezy hasn't got a number yet, and Squeez

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-02 Thread Scott Ferguson
searching through lots of posts in order >> to patch together all the needed information. > > I'm not sure what problem you are having with threading. This is "wrestling with xrandr", you started with a thread called "virtual resolution of desktop" >>>

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-02 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, > > [...] > > > >> What Debian release are you running? $ cat /etc/issue > > > > Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid > > OK. You must be mixing sources (hopefully with judicious pinning). Are you sure? $ cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid \n \l And I definitely do not have any packages i

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-01 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 02/10/11 01:47, Harry Putnam wrote: > Scott Ferguson writes: > > NOTE: Correction to monitor native resolution posted in OP Native > resolution: 1920 x 1200 (I previously said 1900x1280) Thanks. It would be appreciated, greatly, if you could use "Reply" to continue a thread - saves searching

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Lisi writes: > On Saturday 01 October 2011 16:47:26 Harry Putnam wrote: >> Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid >> >> (Installed from new 11.4 install disc (the small one)) > > 11.4??? Wheezy hasn't got a number yet, and Squeeze is 6.0. So do you in > fact mean Ubuntu? And if so, where does the wheezy

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-01 Thread Lisi
On Saturday 01 October 2011 16:47:26 Harry Putnam wrote: > Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid > > (Installed from new 11.4 install disc (the small one)) 11.4??? Wheezy hasn't got a number yet, and Squeeze is 6.0. So do you in fact mean Ubuntu? And if so, where does the wheezy/sid come from? Or am I

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-10-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Scott Ferguson writes: NOTE: Correction to monitor native resolution posted in OP Native resolution: 1920 x 1200 (I previously said 1900x1280) [...] > What Debian release are you running? > $ cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux wheezy/sid (Installed from new 11.4 install disc (the small one)) >

Re: wrestling with xrandr

2011-09-30 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 01/10/11 07:54, Harry Putnam wrote: > My objective is to have a panning desktop. That is, a size that is > larger than my monitor by a fair bit. > > After tinkering exessively, I'm no nearer to having that panning > desktop than before, although I've created some interesting setups and > ve

wrestling with xrandr

2011-09-30 Thread Harry Putnam
I've spent a couple of fun hours trying to understand how xrandr works. How to come up with a command that will do what I want done. Its quite a complex tool and there are volumes written about how to use it. Even some examples in the manpage. However... I have not understood very much of it.