10:21 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Not you Patrick, someone else.
I am sort of quoting
"I still do not know what you have against it is far superior to wordperfect.
Odd idea about a virtual machine too.
The is far superior is the sort of thing I mean. Especially when so many
others have re
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 20/12/14 10:21 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>>
>> Not you Patrick, someone else.
>> I am sort of quoting
>> "I still do not know what you have against > suggesting> it is far superior to wordperfect.
&
On 20/12/14 10:21 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Not you Patrick, someone else.
I am sort of quoting
"I still do not know what you have against suggesting> it is far superior to wordperfect.
Odd idea about a virtual machine too.
The is far superior is the sort of thing I mean. Especially
On 2014-12-21, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> Why do we all have to like the same word processor?
>
> Indeed. And some of us actually like *document* processors (best example in
> Debian: lyx) for extremely consistent output (and IMHO, much higher
> productivity).
(I knew I was right to
a graphic program. I think it competed with a non-graphic MS
Word,
and WordStar. I used WordStar on CPM and then on DOS until I discovered
WordPerfect.
Even after WordStar disappeared as a word processor, Turbo Pascal used its
conventions
in programming. [I wish we still had Turbo Pascal--t
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 18:20:02 +0100
Gary Dale wrote:
> Still don't know what you have against LibreOffice. It's almost
> certainly superior to WP51 in every significant way.
WP5.1 users have to have 'reveal codes' or they can't use anything else.
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-use
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 05:28:00PM -0800, Rusi Mody wrote:
> Just yesterday struggling with making a presentation with LO Impress.
> There are some 3 dozen toolbars of which I was looking for some.
> The online docs give one line of text for each -- no icon.
> https://help.libreoffice.org/Draw/Too
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
> Not you Patrick, someone else.
> I am sort of quoting
> "I still do not know what you have against
> it is far superior to wordperfect.
> Odd idea about a virtual machine too.
> The is far superior is t
Not you Patrick, someone else.
I am sort of quoting
"I still do not know what you have against
it is far superior to wordperfect.
Odd idea about a virtual machine too.
The is far superior is the sort of thing I mean. Especially when so many
others have reasons to appreciate their own
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
> I seem to recall making this point when i shared that while I respect the
> *personal* computing choices of others, I need not emulate them.
> In fact I never asked for word processing suggestions at all. Mine, works,
> for, me...and I th
On Sunday, December 21, 2014 4:40:04 AM UTC+5:30, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> "Just a matter of" doing that? How do I make "." the fill character
> for tabs? It's by no means self evident, because I just went through
> every menu looking for it. Came across Format, Paragraph, Tabs, Fill
> Character, c
I seem to recall making this point when i shared that while I respect the
*personal* computing choices of others, I need not emulate them.
In fact I never asked for word processing suggestions at all. Mine,
works, for, me...and I think the rich thing about computing is the
freedom to use wha
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 20 December 2014 23:19:50 Gary Dale wrote:
> > On 20/12/14 06:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> > > On 20/12/14 06:05 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Why do we all have to like the same word processor?
Indeed. And some of us actually like *doc
Entertaining thread..cool. Long time since I read a WP, reveal codes,
styles dust up :-)
I still use WP8 in a NT4 vbox instance for a couple of tasks..I absolutely
will not give up, I too miss the dot leader feature for my table of
contents.
I miss this feature, and a few more. I use the table f
On Saturday 20 December 2014 23:19:50 Gary Dale wrote:
> On 20/12/14 06:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> > On 20/12/14 06:05 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
[snip]
Why do we all have to like the same word processor?
Lisi
P.S. Sorry, Gary for the off-list just now. It wasn't aimed only at you and
should te
On 20/12/14 06:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 20/12/14 06:05 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
Sorry, meant to send that to Debian user; will do so now, so ignore
until it arrives that way.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Patrick Wiseman
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Gary Dale
wrote:
On 20
On 20/12/14 06:05 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
Sorry, meant to send that to Debian user; will do so now, so ignore
until it arrives that way.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 20/12/14 03:34 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 20/12/14 03:34 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Saturday 20 December 2014 20:05:43 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> O
On 20/12/14 03:34 PM, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Saturday 20 December 2014 20:05:43 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 20/12/14 02:15 PM, Doug wrote:
On 12/20/2014 12:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 17/12
On 20/12/14 03:35 PM, Doug wrote:
On 12/20/2014 02:30 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 20/12/14 02:15 PM, Doug wrote:
On 12/20/2014 12:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 17/12/14 11:35 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Who said anything about running windows?
The only windows I have are made of glass lol.
Although a
On 12/20/2014 02:30 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 20/12/14 02:15 PM, Doug wrote:
On 12/20/2014 12:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 17/12/14 11:35 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Who said anything about running windows?
The only windows I have are made of glass lol.
Although a virtual dos machine might be intere
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 20 December 2014 20:05:43 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
>> > On 20/12/14 02:15 PM, Doug wrote:
>> >> On 12/20/2014 12:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
>> >>> On 17/12/14 11:35 PM, Karen Lewellen
On Saturday 20 December 2014 20:05:43 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> > On 20/12/14 02:15 PM, Doug wrote:
> >> On 12/20/2014 12:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> >>> On 17/12/14 11:35 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Who said anything about running windows?
> >
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 20/12/14 02:15 PM, Doug wrote:
>>
>> On 12/20/2014 12:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17/12/14 11:35 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Who said anything about running windows?
The only windows I have are made of glass lol.
Altho
On 20/12/14 02:15 PM, Doug wrote:
On 12/20/2014 12:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 17/12/14 11:35 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Who said anything about running windows?
The only windows I have are made of glass lol.
Although a virtual dos machine might be interesting if I find
anything over much to do
On 12/20/2014 12:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 17/12/14 11:35 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Who said anything about running windows?
The only windows I have are made of glass lol.
Although a virtual dos machine might be interesting if I find anything over
much to do with Linux.
Thanks for the giggle
On 17/12/14 11:35 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Who said anything about running windows?
The only windows I have are made of glass lol.
Although a virtual dos machine might be interesting if I find anything
over much to do with Linux.
Thanks for the giggle,
Kare
OK, but you can set up a UNIX vi
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:00:56PM -0500, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 12/19/2014 09:41 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >>hm whatever deepens your sense of self lol!
> >>Happy Holidays to you and everyone,
> >
> >Don't forget to have a Me
On 12/19/2014 09:41 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
hm whatever deepens your sense of self lol!
Happy Holidays to you and everyone,
Don't forget to have a Merry christmas!
Chris, I'm looking forward to a change in my meds! Merry
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> hm whatever deepens your sense of self lol!
> Happy Holidays to you and everyone,
Don't forget to have a Merry christmas!
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and l
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:46:59PM +0700, Ken Heard wrote:
>
> These days almost all word processors use the ODF. Transfer of
> documents between the twenty or so word processors, etc., for example
> from a MS Word .docx file to a LibreOffice .odt file and the reverse,
> is well nigh effortless.
On 12/19/2014 02:42 PM, Jape Person wrote:
On 12/19/2014 02:22 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2014-12-19, Karen Lewellen wrote:
My choices work for me, and I am more than willing to respect the
choices
of others, even if I have zero need or desire to emulate them.
Thanks again for the comments, I consid
hm whatever deepens your sense of self lol!
Happy Holidays to you and everyone,
Kare
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Curt wrote:
On 2014-12-19, Karen Lewellen wrote:
My choices work for me, and I am more than willing to respect the choices
of others, even if I have zero need or desire to emulate t
On 12/19/2014 02:22 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2014-12-19, Karen Lewellen wrote:
My choices work for me, and I am more than willing to respect the choices
of others, even if I have zero need or desire to emulate them.
Thanks again for the comments, I consider this thread to be closed, at
least for me
On 2014-12-19, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> My choices work for me, and I am more than willing to respect the choices
> of others, even if I have zero need or desire to emulate them.
> Thanks again for the comments, I consider this thread to be closed, at
> least for me.
I don't think anyone was r
this thread to be closed, at
least for me.
Karen
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Ken Heard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-12-18 00:01, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
On 2014-12-17 Karen Lewellen wrote:
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX.
I got this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-12-18 00:01, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2014-12-17 Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
>> I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX.
>> I got this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my
>>
On 12/17/2014 11:15 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 16/12/14 10:44 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got
this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary
computer and I would welcome, if at all possible, to
wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got
this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary computer
and I would welcome, if at all possible, to use it with Linux as well.
Is there any reason why the program cannot be
On 16/12/14 10:44 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got
this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary
computer and I would welcome, if at all possible, to use it with
Linux as well.
Is there any
Hi Paul.
What an interesting link. thanks for sharing that Dutch project.
Karen
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Doug wrote:
On 12/17/2014 08:58 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Op 17-12-14 om 04:44 schreef Karen Lewellen:
> Greetings everyone,
> I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5
On 12/17/2014 07:43 PM, Charlie wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:14:23 -0500 Ric Moore sent:
Just a little follow-up to the last post. I don't like OpenOffice or
LibreOffice because I don't like the strait-jacket they
put you in.
Which is what?? It certainly isn't the price. :/ Ric
Actually
On 12/17/2014 01:14 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
On 12/16/2014 11:41 PM, Doug wrote:
/snip/
Just a little follow-up to the last post. I don't like OpenOffice or
LibreOffice because I don't like the strait-jacket they
put you in.
Which is what?? It certainly isn't the price. :/ Ric
I don't wan
On 12/17/2014 08:58 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Op 17-12-14 om 04:44 schreef Karen Lewellen:
Greetings everyone,
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got
this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary
computer and I would welcome, if at all
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:14:23 -0500 Ric Moore sent:
> >>
> > Just a little follow-up to the last post. I don't like OpenOffice or
> > LibreOffice because I don't like the strait-jacket they
> > put you in.
>
> Which is what?? It certainly isn't the price. :/ Ric
Actually, I was going to ask
On 12/16/2014 11:41 PM, Doug wrote:
On 12/16/2014 10:57 PM, Doug wrote:
On 12/16/2014 10:44 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I
got this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary
computer and I would
On 2014-12-17 Karen Lewellen wrote:
> I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got
> this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary computer
> and I would welcome, if at all possible, to use it with Linux as well.
> Is there any re
Doug:
> Karen Lewellen:
> > Doug:
> > > There was once (around 1995?) a WordPerfect version for Linux. It
> > > worked, but it had terrible fonts. It has not been possible to
> > > install that for at least the past 4 years, and probably longer,
> >
Op 17-12-14 om 04:44 schreef Karen Lewellen:
> Greetings everyone,
> I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got
> this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary
> computer and I would welcome, if at all possible, to use it with Linux
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
> Greetings everyone,
> I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX.
Which Unix? Which hardware vendor/CPU?
> I got this
> because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary computer and I
> wo
I still have the fourteen years old CDs of the Corel Linux distribution, which
came with WordPerfect.
Re-installed it a couple months ago so I could print some old WP for DOS
documents I had, which did not format properly in more recent versions, or
under LibreOffice.
Had to dig out an old
know?
I need to check this edition then, because it is far more current than
1995 I am sure.
Kare
Ok, I was guessing 1995, it was later. I found my copy of Corel WordPerfect 8
for Linux, Personal Edition. The disk is copyright 1998.
If you have a version for Unix, it might never have run on
> > 1995 I am sure.
>> > Kare
>> >
>> >
>> Ok, I was guessing 1995, it was later. I found my copy of Corel WordPerfect
>> 8 for Linux, Personal Edition. The disk is copyright 1998.
>> If you have a version for Unix, it might never have run on Linux a
essing 1995, it was later. I found my copy of Corel WordPerfect 8
> for Linux, Personal Edition. The disk is copyright 1998.
> If you have a version for Unix, it might never have run on Linux at all. If
> you have some kind of Unix, you could always try it and see
> what happ
On 12/16/2014 11:34 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
YOu know?
I need to check this edition then, because it is far more current than 1995 I
am sure.
Kare
Ok, I was guessing 1995, it was later. I found my copy of Corel WordPerfect 8
for Linux, Personal Edition. The disk is copyright 1998.
If you
On 12/16/2014 08:57 PM, Doug wrote:
> On 12/16/2014 10:44 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>> Greetings everyone,
>> I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got
>> this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary
>> computer and
On 12/16/2014 10:57 PM, Doug wrote:
On 12/16/2014 10:44 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got this
because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary computer and I
would welcome, if at all possible, to
YOu know?
I need to check this edition then, because it is far more current than
1995 I am sure.
Kare
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Doug wrote:
On 12/16/2014 10:44 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got
this because
On 12/16/2014 10:44 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got this
because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary computer and I
would welcome, if at all possible, to use it with Linux as well.
Is there
Greetings everyone,
I have a still in the package copy of wordperfect 5.1 for UNIX. I got
this because wordperfect is my main word processor on my primary computer
and I would welcome, if at all possible, to use it with Linux as well.
Is there any reason why the program cannot be installed on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/07 21:17, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On 11/23/07 23:54, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Dont' forget its best feature (the one that has never been used anywhere
>>> else, but should be)...
>>>
>>> Drum roll, please..
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 07:17:29PM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> I'll take your word for that and accept it as given. I think I only
> used WordStar once, or twice, so it could well have had the feature
> without my knowledge of it.
I still use a partial WordStar clone (jstar) as my text editor
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/07 23:54, Marc Shapiro wrote:
[snip]
Dont' forget its best feature (the one that has never been used anywhere
else, but should be)...
Drum roll, please...
View Codes
Balderdash. WordStar had "show codes" from
On 11/23/07, Mark Grieveson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ah, good ol' WP5.0, and then the great WP5.1. M, it was so fast,
> and could do spell check, underline, bold (5.1 even had italics),
> and vast mail merges! It just automatically returned, without having
> to manually initiate the car
On 11/24/2007 12:40 AM, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> Ah, good ol' WP5.0, and then the great WP5.1. M, it was so fast,
> and could do spell check, underline, bold (5.1 even had italics),
> and vast mail merges! It just automatically returned, without having
> to manually initiate the carriage retu
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 07:24:52AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 11/23/07 23:54, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> [snip]
> > Dont' forget its best feature (the one that has never been used anywhere
> > else, but should be)...
> >
> > Drum roll, please...
> >
> > View Codes
>
> Balderdash. WordStar had "s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/07 23:54, Marc Shapiro wrote:
[snip]
> Dont' forget its best feature (the one that has never been used anywhere
> else, but should be)...
>
> Drum roll, please...
>
> View Codes
Balderdash. WordStar had "show codes" from the beginning.
-
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:54:38PM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Dont' forget its best feature (the one that has never been used anywhere
> else, but should be)...
>
> Drum roll, please...
>
> View Codes
>
> I really liked the ability to see exactly what formatting codes were in the
> file, an
have any of the emacs experts ever
put together a key bindings package for emacs that can make a
wordperfect user feel right at home? The internet service
provider runs freebsd and a couple other subscribers on another
email list would like to get a wp-like environment up and
available o
curious have any of the emacs experts ever
> > > put together a key bindings package for emacs that can make a
> > > wordperfect user feel right at home? The internet service
> > > provider runs freebsd and a couple other subscribers on another
> > > email list w
x27;m curious have any of the emacs experts ever put together a
>>> key bindings package for emacs that can make a wordperfect user feel
>>> right at home? The internet service provider runs freebsd and a couple
>>> other subscribers on another email list would like to get
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 11/23/07 14:37, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > I don't think such can be installed on debian. Probably not on freebsd
> > either, so I'm curious have any of the emacs experts ever put together a
> > key bindings package for e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/07 14:37, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I don't think such can be installed on debian. Probably not on freebsd
> either, so I'm curious have any of the emacs experts ever put together a
> key bindings package for emacs that can
I don't think such can be installed on debian. Probably not on freebsd
either, so I'm curious have any of the emacs experts ever put together a
key bindings package for emacs that can make a wordperfect user feel right
at home? The internet service provider runs freebsd and a co
Ken Heard wrote:
<.>
well ken,
have a good time out there.
happens to be good for relationships.
good luck,
steef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inspired by the comments and suggestions made by several people on the
list, and by Rick Moen's article "WordPerfect on Linux FAQ"
(http://linuxmafia.com/wpfaq/), I was able to install the version of WP8
I had inquired in 2000. Essentially what I did was to use the Debian
eq
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:53:58AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Ken Heard wrote:
> >Herewith is the latest update on my attempts to install WordPerfect
> >8.0 on my Debian 'sarge' GNU/linux distribution.
>
>
>
Debian _is_ about choice. Corel isn&
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 06:04:59PM -0500, Ken Heard wrote:
> So it would appear that packages xlibs and xlibs-data supercede
> xlib6g. In fact, the properties list of xlibs_4.3.0dfsg.1-14sarge1 says
> that it replaces xlib6g(<< 4.0). The xlib6g I was trying to install was
> 3.3.5-1.0.
Ken Heard wrote:
Herewith is the latest update on my attempts to install WordPerfect
8.0 on my Debian 'sarge' GNU/linux distribution.
There is now another possible option: WINE. Now that a beta version
of WINE is out, I may be able to install WP 12 using it.
Good lu
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 06:04:59PM -0500, Ken Heard wrote:
> Herewith is the latest update on my attempts to install WordPerfect
> 8.0 on my Debian 'sarge' GNU/linux distribution.
...
> It is very much of a disappointment that I cannot seem to be able to
&g
Herewith is the latest update on my attempts to install WordPerfect 8.0
on my Debian 'sarge' GNU/linux distribution.
First, I discovered that in my original post of 17 November 2005, I
gave the wrong paths for the files which would be installed by xlib6g. I
only discovered my mist
27;s own
> vintage of wine.)
>
> I am a Word Perfect diehard. Consequently, in 2000, as part of my
> conversion to Linux, I acquired Corel WordPerfect 8.0. However, am only
> now trying to defenistrate myself and take up Linux by means of Debian
> Sarge.
>
>
James Vahn writes:
> Novell, SuSE, TrollTech (KDE's Qt), SCO, Caldera. They (and more) are
> all tied together though the Canopy Group.
Canopy has never had any influence over Novell. Canopy once had a small
interest in Troll Tech. They sold it quite a while ago. Canopy fired
Yarro and severed
Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Caldera purchased some of the assets of SCO, including the SCO name.
Novell, SuSE, TrollTech (KDE's Qt), SCO, Caldera.
They (and more) are all tied together though the Canopy Group.
I wouldn't be suprised to see Corel as another one.
> SCO then renamed itself Tarantella.
> C
(having nothing to contribute to that Corel/SCO/whoever issue, I'll
try to answer the original question...;)
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:33:25PM +, Ken Heard wrote:
> (...)
> Debian being Debian, surely there is a way to install xlib6g without
> having to remove all 175 of those other pa
Almut Behrens wrote:
> On the positive side is, though,
> that when the next vim vs. emacs thread comes up (and I have no clear
> preference as to those two), I can simply lean back, relax and watch
> them argue from the distance ;)
Ha, I could never approach that level of editor zen. Several
to the the only two responses elicited by
> > > my request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained
> > > suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from Kent West
> > > and Patrick Wiseman.
> >
> > WordPerfect is conside
Paul Johnson wrote:
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ken Heard wrote:
Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my
request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained
suggestions as to how to solve my p
Patrick writes:
> I can find no evidence that SCO owns Corel.
The SCO Group (formerly Caldera), the company that now calls itself SCO,
owns neither Corel nor WordPerfect.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick Wiseman wrote:> On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>>> Ken Heard wrote:>>>> > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my
>> > request for
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Ken Heard wrote:
>>
>> > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my
>> > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained
&
* Patrick Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 18:39 -0600]:
>On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ken Heard wrote:
>
> > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my
> > request for help
On 11/19/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ken Heard wrote:> Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my> request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained> suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from Kent Wes
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 17:58 -0600]:
> Ken Heard wrote:
>
> > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my
> > request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained
> > suggestions as to how to solve my probl
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:10:43 -0800
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken Heard wrote:
>
> > Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by
> > my request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained
> > suggestions as to how to
Ken Heard wrote:
> Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my
> request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained
> suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from Kent West and
> Patrick Wiseman.
WordPerfect is considered harmful
On 11/19/05, Ken Heard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was curious about the need to install xlib6, because the wpx-freepackage, which is WordPerfect 8.0, depends not on it but on xlib6g.However, I discovered that the book with which the Corel Linux CDROM I
have was shipped -- Corel Li
Herewith is my follow-up to the the only two responses elicited by my
request for help in installing WordPerfect 8.0 which contained
suggestions as to how to solve my problem -- those from Kent West and
Patrick Wiseman.
First, Mr. West suggested I run "dpkg -i xlib6g.deb". I h
* Almut Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Nov 19 08:55 -0600]:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:58:00AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > > If you want Reveal Codes, you could always edit the XML in Vim...
> >
> > Ugggh! I'll use FTE instead. ;-)
>
> Heh! another fte user -- unbelievable :)
>
> (Tha
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:58:00AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > If you want Reveal Codes, you could always edit the XML in Vim...
>
> Ugggh! I'll use FTE instead. ;-)
Heh! another fte user -- unbelievable :)
(That's my secret love, too, but so far I got the impression I'm the
only one in th
1 - 100 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
