On Thu, 19 May 2011 16:58:02 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Please file a bug report against debootstrap and use
> version 1.0.26 from Squeeze in the meantime.
>
> Sven
Thank you. Downgrading to version 1.0.26+squeeze1 solves my problem.
Cláudio
--
Whoever dies with the most toys wins.
--
To
On 2011-05-19 16:22 +0200, Cláudio E. Elicker wrote:
> I need to build a legacy application in a Woody environment, so I am
> trying to debootstrap a Woody chroot:
>
> # mkdir ~/woody_chroot
> # debootstrap woody ~/woody_chroot http://archive.debian.org/debian
> I: Retrieving Re
I need to build a legacy application in a Woody environment, so I am
trying to debootstrap a Woody chroot:
# mkdir ~/woody_chroot
# debootstrap woody ~/woody_chroot http://archive.debian.org/debian
I: Retrieving Release
E: Invalid Release file, no entry for main/binary-i386/Packages
If I use
From: peasth...@shaw.ca
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:57:26 -0800
> May 13 08:56:14 dalton pppd[2046]: but I couldn't find any suitable secret
> (password) for it to use to do so.
>
> Previously, PPP would refer to /etc/passwd but seems to have forgotten that.
In setting up the fresh machine I pu
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 18:10 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Kun Niu wrote:
> > Somewhere on debian.org are pages on how to upgrade from Woody to Etch. So,
> > I'd read them first and try it.
>
> What about sarge? IIRC, it was woody -> sarge -> etch -> len
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kun Niu wrote:
> Somewhere on debian.org are pages on how to upgrade from Woody to Etch. So,
> I'd read them first and try it.
What about sarge? IIRC, it was woody -> sarge -> etch -> lenny.
You'd have to find a sarge arch
> > Yes. That's what I want. Would that be too dangerous?
> > We've encountered the boot failure problem.
> > But the system works fine when switching back to the old 2.4 kernel.
> >
>
> I don't think that Debian ever supports skipping major releases, and also I
> think that before moving to Etch
r me.
> > And a live cd will be a really good idea.
> > Thank you for your kind reply.
> >
> > On 2009-08-04 22:41, Kun Niu wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > > We've encountered the problem upgrading the kernel to 2.6.8.
> > >> Is that Etch?
&
2009-08-04 22:41, Kun Niu wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > We've encountered the problem upgrading the kernel to 2.6.8.
> >> Is that Etch?
> >>
> >
> > No. Woody provides both 2.4 kernel and 2.6 kernel. But the default is the
> > 2.4 one. There's a 2
ding the kernel to 2.6.8.
>> Is that Etch?
>>
>
> No. Woody provides both 2.4 kernel and 2.6 kernel. But the default is the
> 2.4 one. There's a 2.6 verion in the branch.
>
Ah, I remember that now...
It seems that apt-get fail to execute the update-initramfs and the
uld pay special attention to?
Thanks for any attention and reply in advance.
Are you trying to go straight from Woody to Lenny?
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear all,
My debian system was installed on Sep. 2005.
Now, we've decided to upgrade my present system via apt-get to the latest
stable debian branch.
Our kenel is 2.4.21.
We've encountered the problem upgrading the kernel to 2.6.8.
It seems that apt-get fail to execute the update-initramfs and the
On Fri Jun 20, 2008 at 15:13:59 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> What's the 'virtual console provided by the screen program'? Some sort of
> bolt-on to ssh?
"screen" is a program which allows you to run commands in "windows"
even on a text console.
See here for a reasonable introduction:
ht
Sven Joachim on 20/06/08 15:06, wrote:
On 2008-06-20 15:58 +0200, Adam Hardy wrote:
Those upgrade instructions warn:
"Important! You should not upgrade using telnet, rlogin, rsh, or from
an X session managed by xdm, gdm or kdm etc on the machine you are
upgrading. That is because each of those
On 2008-06-20 15:58 +0200, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Those upgrade instructions warn:
>
> "Important! You should not upgrade using telnet, rlogin, rsh, or from
> an X session managed by xdm, gdm or kdm etc on the machine you are
> upgrading. That is because each of those services may well be
> terminate
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 06:38:59AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:51:25AM -0700, Adam Hardy (debian) wrote:
> > If I put 'sarge' in all the sources.list urls, I should be able to upgrade
> > to sarge OK? Or is it too late?
>
> you
Andrew Sackville-West on 20/06/08 14:38, wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:51:25AM -0700, Adam Hardy (debian) wrote:
[snipped tales of woe regarding mixed systems]
I have a 5 year-old system hosted on Xen by a hosting company, which I only
use for Java and mysql - currently it's running
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:51:25AM -0700, Adam Hardy (debian) wrote:
[snipped tales of woe regarding mixed systems]
>
> I have a 5 year-old system hosted on Xen by a hosting company, which I only
> use for Java and mysql - currently it's running Woody and being slap-dash, I
> t
>On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 07:34:22PM +0100, Chris Austin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have had a Debian system working very well since 2003, when I installed
>> it
>> from the Stable system, which was Woody at the time. Recently I wanted
>> to
>
>... snip
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:07:14AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 18:53 +0200, David wrote:
> > Hi list.
> >
> > Are there any Woody mirrors?
>
> http://archive.debian.org/
And the new toy:
http://archive.debian.net/woody/postgresql
--
Tza
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 18:53 +0200, David wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> Are there any Woody mirrors?
http://archive.debian.org/
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi list.
Are there any Woody mirrors?
One of our servers is still running Woody, and Postgresql 7.2 on the
server has a problem. I want to simulate the problem by installing
Woody on a testing box (sarge has postgresql 7.4), but I can't find
any woody mirrors.
Or maybe someone can suggest
On 09.09.07 19:34, Chris Austin wrote:
> I have had a Debian system working very well since 2003, when I installed it
> from the Stable system, which was Woody at the time. Recently I wanted to
> install the gap package, (Groups, Algorithms and Programming computer
> algebra system),
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 07:34:22PM +0100, Chris Austin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have had a Debian system working very well since 2003, when I installed it
> from the Stable system, which was Woody at the time. Recently I wanted to
... snipped woes of a partial upgrade ...
> hit an
Hi,
I have had a Debian system working very well since 2003, when I installed it
from the Stable system, which was Woody at the time. Recently I wanted to
install the gap package, (Groups, Algorithms and Programming computer
algebra system), and for this I had to start upgrading packages to the
On 12.06.07 15:29, Chris Robinson wrote:
> I am trying to run the folloing in woody using cron so my cron
(upgrade asap)
> 2,12,22,32,42,52 * * * * /path to macro
>
&g
On 6/12/07, Chris Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I am trying to run the folloing in woody using cron so my cron
2,12,22,32,42,52 * * * * /path to macro
#!/bin/sh
#
#
chgrp -R nogroup /usr/local/apache2/www/foodmanagementsystems.com/gary
I can not find a log. The macro does no
Hi
I am trying to run the folloing in woody using cron so my cron
2,12,22,32,42,52 * * * * /path to macro
#!/bin/sh
Hello Tony,
Am 2007-03-07 13:37:51, schrieb Tony Heal:
> Does anyone know if there is a libc6 package available somewhere, for
> woody, that has the new DST fix? I am trying to
You need to update this by hand
> update the server to sarge, but I am getting resistance from the
> bos
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
[snip]
I have a 171 MB drive on a shelf set up as a rescue system I can plug in
if needed (since I can't boot from a CD or USB) that has a strong
text-only system.
[snip]
You almost surely can boot from a floppy disc. I recommend you to
get SBM (Smart Boot Manager
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:01:56AM +0100, Mirko Scurk wrote:
>
> I'm trying to install woody on Digital Venturis 466 486DX66, 540MB HDD,
> 20MB RAM, CD-ROM, S3 Turbo VGA 1MB and EtherWorks III ISA network adapter.
>
> The first stage of install went fine but after installing
Am 2007-03-04 15:04:57, schrieb pobox:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:28:45AM +0100, Peter Teunissen wrote:
> > Ah, memories. I wrote my first basic program on a sinclair zx81 :-)
> > It played russian roulette, sort of graphical ;-)
>
> LOL!
> Graphics on ZX81! I remember that :)
I had the HRG M
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Rick Thomas wrote:
> PS: Remind the boss that Woody isn't getting security updates any
> more... (Or at least that will become true after Etch releases and
> Sarge becomes "oldstable")
Actually, Woody hasn't been recieving security updates since
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, John Hasler wrote:
> Tony writes:
> > Does anyone know if there is a libc6 package available somewhere, for
> > woody, that has the new DST fix? I am trying to update the server to
> > sarge, but I am getting resistance from the boss, so I need to patch
Tony writes:
> Does anyone know if there is a libc6 package available somewhere, for
> woody, that has the new DST fix? I am trying to update the server to
> sarge, but I am getting resistance from the boss, so I need to patch this
> server until then.
Just update the zone file by ha
On Mar 7, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Tony Heal wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a libc6 package available somewhere,
for woody, that has the new DST fix? I am trying to update the
server to sarge, but I am getting resistance from the boss, so I
need to patch this server until then.
Hi Tony
Does anyone know if there is a libc6 package available somewhere, for woody,
that has the new DST fix? I am trying to
update the server to sarge, but I am getting resistance from the boss, so I
need to patch this server until then.
Thanks
Tony
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:59:35AM -0500, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:46:56AM -0500, Ed Curtis wrote:
> >
> > I get this error when I apt-get update:
> >
> > Err http://ftp.debian.org woody/main Packages
> > 404 Not Found
> &g
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:46:56AM -0500, Ed Curtis wrote:
>
> I get this error when I apt-get update:
>
> Err http://ftp.debian.org woody/main Packages
> 404 Not Found
> Ign http://ftp.debian.org woody/main Release
>
> Apparently, the repository no longer exists
I get this error when I apt-get update:
Err http://ftp.debian.org woody/main Packages
404 Not Found
Ign http://ftp.debian.org woody/main Release
Apparently, the repository no longer exists?
Thanks,
Ed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:28:45AM +0100, Peter Teunissen wrote:
> Ah, memories. I wrote my first basic program on a sinclair zx81 :-)
> It played russian roulette, sort of graphical ;-)
LOL!
Graphics on ZX81! I remember that :)
Juraj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Juraj writes:
> Z88 was computer made by Sir Clive Sinclair with Z8000 CPU.
The Z88 was a portable Z80 based computer designed by Sinclair and marketed
as the Cambridge Z88.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On 3-mrt-2007, at 22:16, pobox wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 05:29:08PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-02-22 09:25:14, schrieb Mike McCarty:
The Z80 was the sales name but intern it was Z8000.
From my mind (maybe wrong):
Z88 was computer made by Sir Clive Sinclair with Z8000 CPU.
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 05:29:08PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-02-22 09:25:14, schrieb Mike McCarty:
> The Z80 was the sales name but intern it was Z8000.
>From my mind (maybe wrong):
Z88 was computer made by Sir Clive Sinclair with Z8000 CPU.
I do sometimes find it hard to distinguis
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 08:56 -0800, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> (**) Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
> (EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input/mice
> No such device.
> (EE) Generic Mouse: cannot open input device
> (EE) PreInit failed for input device "Generic Mouse"
> (II) UnloadModu
in
Debian.
> I'm inclined to presume the former - but if so, well, the system is
> running on a kernel that was current when 'woody' was still the stable
> release of debian. Did kernels of that generation even have this
> driver - or am I looking at a need to upgrade
d dynamically and not built into the main kernel?
Or is this a "driver" in some sense specific to X?
I'm inclined to presume the former - but if so, well, the system is
running on a kernel that was current when 'woody' was still the stable
release of debian. Did kernels of th
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> The Z80 was the sales name but intern it was Z8000.
Not true. The Z80 was an 8-bitter, upward-compatible with the 8080. The
Z8000 was a 16-bitter, with a completely different architecture and
instruction set.
> Z80 => 1983
Z80 => 1976
Z8000 => 1979
--
John Hasler
I remember the Z80 on the Altos 586 and 986 series...
We ran Altos Xenix 3.0 on them...
They used a Z80 for each set of 4 serial ports...
But the main processor was an early x86 I think.
That is the machine I learned *nix on!
(it was better than MPM or Oasis (later called Theos))...
(showing my
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-02-22 09:25:14, schrieb Mike McCarty:
Sinclair ZX81 => Zylog Z80/Z8000
The Zilog Z80 is an 8 bit machine, the Z8000 is a 16 bit machine.
The Z80 was the sales name but intern it was Z8000.
I went and looked at the Wikipedia article about the Z8000
and I
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-02-22 09:25:14, schrieb Mike McCarty:
Sinclair ZX81 => Zylog Z80/Z8000
The Zilog Z80 is an 8 bit machine, the Z8000 is a 16 bit machine.
The Z80 was the sales name but intern it was Z8000.
Hmm? The Z8000 was a machine I programmed for 16 years or so,
and
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hey Mike,
Am 2007-02-20 14:04:27, schrieb Mike McCarty:
Don't listen to him. He thinks he's the only Real Geek. I've
written boot firmware for several new boards when I worked in
telecomm, and he doesn't think I'm a Real Geek.
HOW easy is it today to write VERY small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/07 10:29, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-02-22 09:25:14, schrieb Mike McCarty:
>>> Sinclair ZX81 => Zylog Z80/Z8000
>> The Zilog Z80 is an 8 bit machine, the Z8000 is a 16 bit machine.
>
> The Z80 was the sales name but intern it was Z800
Am 2007-02-22 09:30:08, schrieb Mike McCarty:
> This sort of thing is already happening. Many Linux distros
> claim to "keep old hardware alive", but won't run on anything
> less than a Pentium with at least 32MB of RAM.
I consider all Computers from 486/75 to P1/266 with 32 to 128 MByte
and usefu
Am 2007-02-21 13:18:54, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> I'm stunned that "they" still make 32MB DRAM modules.
It was one of the first Modules produced, but while searchin the
Net I have found on eBay only 64 MByte for 3 years or such.
> Why all that horsepower to track radar signals?
Analysis. My progra
Am 2007-02-22 09:31:43, schrieb Mike McCarty:
> I don't consider anything like a Pentium to be a "small" or "old"
> machine. In my life, Pentium is still premium.
I have 9 HP Vectry XA5/200MMT with each of 192 to 384 MByte
of memory. All of them are using 8-32 GByte HDD's and three
of them 3w65xx
Am 2007-02-22 09:25:14, schrieb Mike McCarty:
> > Sinclair ZX81 => Zylog Z80/Z8000
>
> The Zilog Z80 is an 8 bit machine, the Z8000 is a 16 bit machine.
The Z80 was the sales name but intern it was Z8000.
The 16 bit CPU was the:
> >and then Later the Zylog Z8400 (16 bit)
...long time ago.
Z80
Hey Mike,
Am 2007-02-20 14:04:27, schrieb Mike McCarty:
> Don't listen to him. He thinks he's the only Real Geek. I've
> written boot firmware for several new boards when I worked in
> telecomm, and he doesn't think I'm a Real Geek.
HOW easy is it today to write VERY small BIOS code
to recognize
Am 2007-02-20 10:34:03, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> On 02/20/07 10:18, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..write new bios code for old 386 irons to use todays new big ass disks
> > is trivial to you? ;o)
>
> If you can't write your own BIOS, you aren't a Real Geek.
What about Linux-BIOS?
And of all, the BIOS
Am 2007-02-21 13:16:04, schrieb Joshua J. Kugler:
> To clarify: couldn't find any *for sale* online.
>
> I can find plenty of pages talking about them, just none for sale.
Since the official sale is not before March 2007?
:-)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadminis
Am 2007-02-21 13:13:33, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> Where from? What's the model number?
From my IBM Media-Server seller in Offenburg/Germany. The HDD'S
are Deskstar 7K1000 in SATA. On Tuesday I have goten an E-Mail
and maybe I get the Disks next week.
Officialy they are sold at the end of March in
On Mar 02 2007, Wackojacko wrote:
>
> Arlie Stephens wrote:
>
> >The complaint is that it fails to find a framebuffer, regardless of
> >which answer I give to the question of whether or not to use the
> >kernel's framebuffer.
>
> Have you tried manually editing the file? Comment out the UseFBD
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 07:56 -0800, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> The complaint is that it fails to find a framebuffer, regardless of
> which answer I give to the question of whether or not to use the
> kernel's framebuffer. I (stupidly) failed to save the XF86Config file
> before starting, but the curren
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:56:27AM -0800, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> Hi All,
HI
[...]
>
> X was running after that first stage of the upgrade (to latest woody)
> but would not restart once I rebooted the system. I went ahead and
> upgraded to sarge anyway, figuring I might get l
Arlie Stephens wrote:
The complaint is that it fails to find a framebuffer, regardless of
which answer I give to the question of whether or not to use the
kernel's framebuffer.
Have you tried manually editing the file? Comment out the UseFBDev
option below. There are two other modules not
Hi All,
You folks were so helpful with my last problem, I thought I'd impose
on your patience once again with the next one downstream.
Two nights ago I (finally) upgraded an elderly system from woody to
sarge. X stopped working. Moreover, it seems to have stopped working
not during the up
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 23:17 -0800, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> Well, I'm not exactly the world's most experienced systems
> administrator - in fact, the term "incompetent amateur" is perhaps
> more like it ;-) So it might be a bit more onerous for me than for
> others.
I've been running Etch for so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/07 01:17, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>> Now, you've got to upgrade from Woody to Sarge and then soon
>> upgrade from Sarge to Etch. That 2-step process is much slower
>> an
On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/01/07 09:48, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> > The problem - I tried to upgrade an elderly system from woody to
> > sarge. Now it doesn't boot. I suspect the upgrade ate the master boot
> > record - but I don't even know the
On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > *sigh* You are the second person to suggest in effect never actually
> > upgrading a debian system,
>
> We'd *never* say that.
Well, what the other fellow said was that in his shop, they prefer
to reinstall from scratch, a
>> Etch, wiping out (before, of course, saving all mods from /etc...)
>> everything except /home.
>
> *sigh* You are the second person to suggest in effect never actually
> upgrading a debian system,
We'd *never* say that.
>or at least never g
e.
*sigh* You are the second person to suggest in effect never actually
upgrading a debian system, or at least never going from woody to
sarge.
I'd be much happier is this had happened *after* etch became
officially stable. There's been a lot of churn in the last month or
so, and I'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/07 18:22, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 03/01/07 09:48, Arlie Stephens wrote:
>
[snip]
> I'll make one tonight, and try re-installing LILO.
> Then I'll doubtless be on to the next problem, but it's a stage
On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/01/07 09:48, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> > The problem - I tried to upgrade an elderly system from woody to
> > sarge. Now it doesn't boot. I suspect the upgrade ate the master boot
> > record - but I don't even know the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/07 09:48, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm hoping the collective wisdom of this list can point me at the
> right TFM. I'm also somewhat inclined to vent.
>
> The problem - I tried to upgrade an elderly
Hi Folks,
I'm hoping the collective wisdom of this list can point me at the
right TFM. I'm also somewhat inclined to vent.
The problem - I tried to upgrade an elderly system from woody to
sarge. Now it doesn't boot. I suspect the upgrade ate the master boot
record - but I don&
Am 2007-02-17 21:36:42, schrieb Mirko Scurk:
> It's shame that there is not a "normal" (non e-bay) supply channel for
> parts for some old architectures. Every other equipment manufacturers have
> obligations to continue to produce spare parts for years after some
> product have ended. Yesterday, b
installing Oracle9i on Debian
>
> This mailing list is for discussing work on the Debian web site, not
> providing support, so I've copied this reply to debian-user. Was
> there something on the web site that led you to believe this list was
> for providing user support?
Actual
> Mike McCarty writes:
> > 8086 is 16 bit bus, 16 bit registers
16 bit data bus
On 22.02.07 10:43, John Hasler wrote:
> But with a bizarre segmentation scheme and a 20 bit address bus able to
> address 1MB.
similar to PAE on newer pentiums
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/07 22:35, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/22/07 10:43, John Hasler wrote:
>>
>>> Mike McCarty writes:
>>>
8086 is 16 bit bus, 16 bit registers
>>>
>>> But with a biz
John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
But back in the day, with the limited silicon budget, segmentation is a
great way for a 16 bit system (that wants to maintain upward
compatibility with the 8080/8085) to address more than 64KB.
There was no upward compatibility between the 8080 and the
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/07 10:43, John Hasler wrote:
Mike McCarty writes:
8086 is 16 bit bus, 16 bit registers
But with a bizarre segmentation scheme and a 20 bit address bus able to
address 1MB.
But back in the day, with the limited sil
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:46:52PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Ron Johnson writes:
> > But back in the day, with the limited silicon budget, segmentation is a
> > great way for a 16 bit system (that wants to maintain upward
> > compatibility with the 8080/8085) to address more than 64KB.
>
> There
Ron Johnson writes:
> But back in the day, with the limited silicon budget, segmentation is a
> great way for a 16 bit system (that wants to maintain upward
> compatibility with the 8080/8085) to address more than 64KB.
There was no upward compatibility between the 8080 and the 8086.
--
John Hasl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/07 09:30, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Am 2007-02-17 22:23:25, schrieb Chris Bannister:
>>
>>> And I suppose when Vista has been out for a while (people wont have any
>>> choice when they buy a new machine, unless they buy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/07 10:43, John Hasler wrote:
> Mike McCarty writes:
>> 8086 is 16 bit bus, 16 bit registers
>
> But with a bizarre segmentation scheme and a 20 bit address bus able to
> address 1MB.
But back in the day, with the limited silicon budget, segm
Mike McCarty writes:
> 8086 is 16 bit bus, 16 bit registers
But with a bizarre segmentation scheme and a 20 bit address bus able to
address 1MB.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Dryba wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2007 17:46 schrieb Michelle Konzack:
Am 2007-02-17 11:51:56, schrieb Ron Johnson:
Still, I have a old Celeron 600mhz with 16MB acting as a server running
I have a P I (100mhz) with 64MB ram acting as a backupserver (tape), a P II
(333mhz) with
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-02-17 22:23:25, schrieb Chris Bannister:
And I suppose when Vista has been out for a while (people wont have any
choice when they buy a new machine, unless they buy one without an OS)
256M or even 512M will be considered old and we'll see questions like
"Will KDE
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-02-15 21:19:26, schrieb Mike McCarty:
[snip]
How do you have coded this on a 8085?
Was it not a 8080/8086 and they are 8 Bit
8080 is 8 bit
8085 is 8 bit
8086 is 16 bit bus, 16 bit registers
8087 is numeric processor
8088 is 8 bit bus, 16 bit registers, same
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-02-15 21:19:26, schrieb Mike McCarty:
Ron Johnson wrote:
So, what GUI do you use?
Eh? With MSDOS? No gooey stuff in there!
Maybe SEAL?
But there are several other DOS-Desktops including my own one
which has/had a scientific background and was coded using D
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-02-16 09:57:22, schrieb Ron Johnson:
I wrote...
I have 16MB of RAM because that's the minimum configuration
for that machine when I bought it. And, actually, I have
used some of the extended RAM on occasion, with a disassembler
(Sourcer) I used to run. I haven'
Celejar wrote:
>> Some people are still making money utilizing old pc-s. Some car testing
>> appliances are equipped with only serial connector which many current
>> notebooks are missing.
>
> They make serial to USB converter cables / chips. There's apparently
> some linux support; see
> linux-s
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:19 -0500, Larry Irwin wrote:
> > On 02/21/07 14:07, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 21 February 2007 10:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Note: Last week I have ordered four of the first 1 TByte
> Hitachi HardDisks for my 3w9500 as Backup-Server.
> >>> Wher
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 12:19, Larry Irwin wrote:
> > On 02/21/07 14:07, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 21 February 2007 10:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Note: Last week I have ordered four of the first 1 TByte
> Hitachi HardDisks for my 3w9500 as Backup-Server.
> >>>
>
On 02/21/07 14:07, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 10:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
Note: Last week I have ordered four of the first 1 TByte
Hitachi HardDisks for my 3w9500 as Backup-Server.
Where from? What's the model number?
http://www.hitachigst.com/portal/site/en/me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/21/07 14:07, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 February 2007 10:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Note: Last week I have ordered four of the first 1 TByte
>>> Hitachi HardDisks for my 3w9500 as Backup-Server.
>> Where from? What's the mod
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 10:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Note: Last week I have ordered four of the first 1 TByte
> > Hitachi HardDisks for my 3w9500 as Backup-Server.
>
> Where from? What's the model number?
http://www.hitachigst.com/portal/site/en/menuitem.8027a91c954924ae4bda9f30eac4f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/21/07 10:46, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-02-17 11:51:56, schrieb Ron Johnson:
>>> Still, I have a old Celeron 600mhz with 16MB acting as a server running
>> C600 with only 16MB???
>
> I have an Athlon XP2400+ running with a PC2700/333 32 M
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:21:27PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/16/07 15:55, Mike McCarty wrote:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On 02/16/07 14:45, Mike McCarty wrote:
> >>
>
> Why not install Linux and dosemu?
> >>>
> >>> On a machine
1 - 100 of 7197 matches
Mail list logo
