On 24.01.2016 15:45, John Hasler wrote:
> deb...@semioptimal.net writes:
>> That'll be quite expensive on the electric bill, but will work.
>
> Not really. The numbers on the back of the power supply are maximums,
> not typicals.
no, they are what your PSU vendor tells you the PSU can provide o
deb...@semioptimal.net writes:
> That'll be quite expensive on the electric bill, but will work.
Not really. The numbers on the back of the power supply are maximums,
not typicals.
> However, I think there are no newer Wifi-Chips with PCI, so you'd be
> stuck with 802.11a/g...
A router and a Wi
at 802.11g) with debian.
> Basically I am interested in just using an older computer I have laying
> around (I'll likely use an older Compaq Deskpro Pentium III) and build it
> into a wired / wireless router.
That'll be quite expensive on the electric bill, but will work. Howe
Hi GC
On 22.01.2016 06:19, GC wrote:
> There's a lot of great tutorials on how to build your own router (wired) but
> I can't seem to find anything that covers steps on how to build your own
> wireless router?
> Anyone have some advice on this topic or can share some art
On 22/01/16 15:19, GC wrote:
> There's a lot of great tutorials on how to build your own router (wired) but
> I can't seem to find anything that covers steps on how to build your own
> wireless router?
> Anyone have some advice on this topic or can share some articles,
&g
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:19:54 -0800
GC wrote:
> There's a lot of great tutorials on how to build your own router
> (wired) but I can't seem to find anything that covers steps on how to
> build your own wireless router? Anyone have some advice on this topic
> or can share
There's a lot of great tutorials on how to build your own router (wired) but I
can't seem to find anything that covers steps on how to build your own wireless
router?
Anyone have some advice on this topic or can share some articles, step-by-step
tutorials, links, etc on this?
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:23:40 -0300, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> My home network is very very slow. My access to modem and/or router
> bring up "out of time" on iceweasel.
>
> I have a modem TP-LINK 8816 ADSL2/2+ and a wireless router TP-LINK
> TL-WR541G/TL-WR542G at home.
>
My home network is very very slow. My access to modem and/or router
bring up "out of time" on iceweasel.
I have a modem TP-LINK 8816 ADSL2/2+ and a wireless router TP-LINK
TL-WR541G/TL-WR542G at home.
Modem configurations are:
*LAN*
IP Address: 192.168.1.1
On Thu, November 26, 2009 07:05, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
> What could cause such device to stop working (in general)? I also cannot
> ping the device eventhough its LED indicates it to be working.
>
FWIW, I had my zyxel router lock up in a similar way. After looking in
it's log it turned out that
What could cause such device to stop working (in general)? I also cannot
ping the device eventhough its LED indicates it to be working.
--
Regards,
Umarzuki Mochlis
http://gameornot.net
Vinicius Massuchetto wrote at 2009-10-10 08:44 -0500:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, green wrote:
> > Here is one way:
> > 1. Set the IP address statically on the laptop for eth0 (192.168.0.1).
>
> I did this. My eth1 is on 192.168.1.1.
eth0 is on the WAN/internet side?
> > 2. Set up a DHCP
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, green wrote:
> Vinicius Massuchetto wrote at 2009-10-02 11:54 -0500:
[...]
> Here is one way:
> 1. Set the IP address statically on the laptop for eth0 (192.168.0.1).
I did this. My eth1 is on 192.168.1.1.
> 2. Set up a DHCP server (I use dnsmasq) on the laptop,
On 2009-10-02, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I tried hard a few days ago to share a ppp internet connection through
> the wlan interface on my laptop. I just found out that this is not
> possible because my hardware can't do AP.
>
> So, I was wondering if
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>>> So, I was wondering if I get a standard wireless router and feed it
>>>> with an internet connection from the laptop, configuring my computer
>>>> as a dhcp server.
>>> I can't think of an
> So, I was wondering if I get a standard wireless router and feed it
> with an internet connection from the laptop, configuring my computer
> as a dhcp server.
I can't think of any reason why you couldn't do it (especially if you
install OpenWRT on the router). But I wo
green wrote:
Vinicius Massuchetto wrote at 2009-10-03 07:34 -0500:
I can't seem to find the Netgear model you recommended on my city.
I recommend a Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 running the DD-WRT firmware. If the price is
acceptable to you, it would probably be a good choice. It will definite
Vinicius Massuchetto wrote at 2009-10-03 07:34 -0500:
> I can't seem to find the Netgear model you recommended on my city.
I recommend a Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 running the DD-WRT firmware. If the price is
acceptable to you, it would probably be a good choice. It will definitely work
for sharing an
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:00 PM, wrote:
> Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
[...]
>> So, I was wondering if I get a standard wireless router and feed it
>> with an internet connection from the laptop, configuring my computer
>> as a dhcp server.
>>
>> Would that wo
Vinicius Massuchetto wrote at 2009-10-02 11:54 -0500:
> So, I was wondering if I get a standard wireless router and feed it
> with an internet connection from the laptop, configuring my computer
> as a dhcp server.
>
> Would that work? Did anyone already tried this?
This is pos
Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Hi all!
I tried hard a few days ago to share a ppp internet connection through
the wlan interface on my laptop. I just found out that this is not
possible because my hardware can't do AP.
So, I was wondering if I get a standard wireless router and feed it
wi
Hi all!
I tried hard a few days ago to share a ppp internet connection through
the wlan interface on my laptop. I just found out that this is not
possible because my hardware can't do AP.
So, I was wondering if I get a standard wireless router and feed it
with an internet connection fro
Solved, in http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/06/msg02141.html
regards
-r
2009/7/1 Mark Neidorff
> On Thursday 25 June 2009 04:27 am, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> > Hi you all,
> >
> > I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
> > it to extend my DSL connection at
On Thursday 25 June 2009 04:27 am, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> Hi you all,
>
> I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
> it to extend my DSL connection at home.
> I am not new to debian but network(ing) skills are modest.
>
> Does anyone own this device and running debia
Hi,
I finally configured my devices leaving the DSL modem act like always
and doing dhcp.
The WRT54GL, with DHCP disabled, is connected to the modem using a
standard port. I assigned the WRT the 192.168.1.254 ip address and
choose to use it as a gateway from the setup panel.
I can now reach the
First of all, thank you all.
I love debian and know the kindness of its users :-)
I am now browsing connected to the Linksys which has the dhcp turned
on as Jochen suggested.
But now, as Sjoerd suggested I need to setup wlan stuffs on the
Linksys from my debian box. 192.168.1.1 give me the web co
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Raffaele Morelli:
1. assign a static ip to the WRT in the range of 192.168.1.0/24 but
different from the one of DSL modem
Most probably you will not need to do that since this is the default
behaviour of the WRT. The public (modem) interface gets its IP address
ass
Raffaele Morelli:
>
> 1. assign a static ip to the WRT in the range of 192.168.1.0/24 but
> different from the one of DSL modem
Most probably you will not need to do that since this is the default
behaviour of the WRT. The public (modem) interface gets its IP address
assigned automatically.
> 2.
Raffaele Morelli schreef:
> 2009/6/25 Johannes Wiedersich :
>> Raffaele Morelli wrote:
>>> 2009/6/25 Jochen Schulz :
Raffaele Morelli:
> I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
> it to extend my DSL connection at home.
> I am not new to debian but netw
2009/6/25 Johannes Wiedersich :
> Raffaele Morelli wrote:
>> 2009/6/25 Jochen Schulz :
>>> Raffaele Morelli:
I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
it to extend my DSL connection at home.
I am not new to debian but network(ing) skills are modest.
>
Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> 2009/6/25 Jochen Schulz :
>> Raffaele Morelli:
>>> I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
>>> it to extend my DSL connection at home.
>>> I am not new to debian but network(ing) skills are modest.
>>>
>>> Does anyone own this device and runni
2009/6/25 Jochen Schulz :
> Raffaele Morelli:
>>
>> I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
>> it to extend my DSL connection at home.
>> I am not new to debian but network(ing) skills are modest.
>>
>> Does anyone own this device and running debian?
>
> Yes, I do. I a
Raffaele Morelli:
>
> I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
> it to extend my DSL connection at home.
> I am not new to debian but network(ing) skills are modest.
>
> Does anyone own this device and running debian?
Yes, I do. I am running OpenWrt on it, though.
>
; > connection, though.
> > I just use sshs and sshfs to move files around, etc.
> > My networking fu is about as sharp as a mud puddle after a thunderstorm.
> >
> > /tony
>
> Reading the user manual it shows that I must use the WRT in
> conjunction with my dsl m
2009/6/25 Tony Baldwin :
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:27:59AM +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
>> Hi you all,
>>
>> I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
>> it to extend my DSL connection at home.
>> I am not new to debian but network(ing) skills are modest.
>>
>> Does
Hello Raffaele,
emDebian ( www.emdebian.org ) might be what you want, but it is not yet ready.
You may give a try to OpenWRT ( www.openwrt.org ).
Jerome
Raffaele Morelli wrote:
Hi you all,
I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
it to extend my DSL connection
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:27:59AM +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> Hi you all,
>
> I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
> it to extend my DSL connection at home.
> I am not new to debian but network(ing) skills are modest.
>
> Does anyone own this device and runn
Hi you all,
I bought a LinkSys WRT54GL wirelss router and I am going to configure
it to extend my DSL connection at home.
I am not new to debian but network(ing) skills are modest.
Does anyone own this device and running debian?
Any hint /solution about debian specific setup/trick is appreciated.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:32:28PM -0400, Daryl Styrk wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:51:30AM -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> > And after having to reboot constantly for weeks, I purchashed
> > a PC Engines Wrap board, loaded up some M0n0wall firewall software and
> > never looked back.
>
> If
a
m0n0wall. Or, you could just use your existing Netgear router as a
dedicated wireless AP (turn off DHCP). When I was ready to go wireless
I found it much cheaper to buy a used Linksys wireless router locally from
Craigslist for $15 USD. I can also use the ethernets ports as a regular
switch f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:51:30AM -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
>
> You didn't mention what kind of internet service you have. Cable, DSL?
> I ask because I remember having issues with a Netgear router when I
> got my first DSL line in 2001. The default
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:03:13AM -0400, Daryl Styrk wrote:
>
> I'm having some issues with a new router. For normal browsing it seems
> to perform fine. However when I start to download large files speeds drop
> off from around over 1400KB/s down to 120KB/s. I haven't put a stopwatch
> to it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having some issues with a new router. For normal browsing it seems
to perform fine. However when I start to download large files speeds drop
off from around over 1400KB/s down to 120KB/s. I haven't put a stopwatch
to it but it seems to be aroun
> The time has come to replace my garbage router. I am looking at the
> WRT54GL because of the available firmware, however, I need a USB print
> server as I do not want to replace my wonderful USB all-in-one HP
> printer. Which quality wireless routers can run Tomato and have USB
> print servers? T
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:06:21 +0200
"Dotan Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The time has come to replace my garbage router. I am looking at the
> WRT54GL because of the available firmware, however, I need a USB print
> server as I do not want to replace my wonderful USB all-in-one HP
> printer. W
The time has come to replace my garbage router. I am looking at the
WRT54GL because of the available firmware, however, I need a USB print
server as I do not want to replace my wonderful USB all-in-one HP
printer. Which quality wireless routers can run Tomato and have USB
print servers? Thanks!
--
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 06:42:17PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Gregory,
>
> Am 2008-06-28 12:30:15, schrieb Gregory Seidman:
> > I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
> > ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to replace
> > the
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:06:15PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Gregory Seidman wrote:
>
>> Once I have the hardware, it's just a matter of figuring out how to set up
>> the iptables for NAT routing and appropriate firewalling. Actually, since I
>> don't have wireless needs at the moment, I can start worki
Hello Gregory,
Am 2008-06-28 12:30:15, schrieb Gregory Seidman:
> I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
> ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to replace
> the (wired only) LinkSys I have now. It only has one PCI slot, but I want
> to be
Gregory Seidman wrote:
Once I have the hardware, it's just a matter of figuring out how to set up
the iptables for NAT routing and appropriate firewalling. Actually, since I
don't have wireless needs at the moment, I can start working on it this
weekend even before I receive the wireless card, a
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:26:28AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I can confirm that the Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 is very stable under OpenWRT White
> Russian, which gives you (yet) another option if you go down the path of
> buying a new router/AP device.
>
> Alternatively, if you're set on using
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:03 AM, thveillon.debian
> Looks like Netgear is about to bring us a nice toy :
>
> "The high-performance WGR614L, which is "Works with Windows Vista"
Sorry to rain on the parade, but (to echo some comments on slashdot),
no pre-N, gigabit ethernet or usb ports? 4MB flash an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Let me add my name to the list of supporters. I originally installed a
D-Link but eventually replaced it with the 54GL. I also use the companion
Linksys range extender.
Larry
Looks like Netgear is about to bring us a nice toy :
"The high-performance WGR614L, whi
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/29/08 10:31, j t wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Adding all this extra equipment is going to cost you *much* more
>>> than buying a Linksys WRT56GL and reflashing it with the Tomato
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:59:34AM +0100, j t wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:41:58PM +0100, j t wrote:
> >> Having said that, I run openwrt on a couple of asus routers: one
> >> wl-hdd and one asus wl-500g and they have
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:41:58PM +0100, j t wrote:
>> Having said that, I run openwrt on a couple of asus routers: one
>> wl-hdd and one asus wl-500g and they have the same issue with regards
>
> there has been some changes
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:41:58PM +0100, j t wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Gregory Seidman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Having said that, I run openwrt on a couple of asus routers: one
> wl-hdd and one asus wl-500g and they have the same issue with regards
there has been so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/29/08 17:41, j t wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Gregory Seidman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've heard of this. I was kind of hoping to do all this with Debian, but it
>> sounds like the WRT54GL is a better bet, but only if it can
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:26:28AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> I can confirm that the Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 is very stable under OpenWRT
> White Russian, which gives you (yet) another option if you go down the
> path of buying a new router/AP device.
>
> Alternatively, if you're set on using your exist
Greg,
I can confirm that the Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 is very stable under OpenWRT White
Russian, which gives you (yet) another option if you go down the path of
buying a new router/AP device.
Alternatively, if you're set on using your existing box as your router/AP,
why not use a USB Wi-Fi device if y
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Gregory Seidman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've heard of this. I was kind of hoping to do all this with Debian, but it
> sounds like the WRT54GL is a better bet, but only if it can actually
> firewall the wired subnet from the wireless subnet. A little bit of
> go
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 02:06:57PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/29/08 10:31, j t wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Adding all this extra equipment is going to cost you *much* more
> >> th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/29/08 10:31, j t wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Adding all this extra equipment is going to cost you *much* more
>> than buying a Linksys WRT56GL and reflashing it with the Tomato or
>> DD-WRT
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding all this extra equipment is going to cost you *much* more
> than buying a Linksys WRT56GL and reflashing it with the Tomato or
> DD-WRT firmware.
OK, I've just spent 10 minutes searching for Linksys WRT56GL (a pair
of
Celejar wrote:
I'm considering these options, too. IIUC, another argument in favor of
the former option is the power draw; isn't it much lower for a SOHO
router than for a full blown computer running as a router?
Yes, you are correct. Plus the form factor, no upgrades, no keyboard,
etc. If o
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:50:51 -0400
"H.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I would say the consumer router choice (e.g. WRT-54G(L)) is the easiest
> to implement. The other choice, making a computer as a router, is quite
> involved but interesting (could be made very streamlined using a
> fire
Nick Lidakis wrote:
cables and antennas, would have been a big expense. It was much cheaper
to pick up a used Linksys WRT54G ($20 from Craigslist) and use it as a
Yup, going this way is going to be cheaper, no doubt. However, if the OP
goes the way he is thinking about (adding a multiport N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/28/08 22:05, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:04:52PM +0200, oneman wrote:
>> On 28-jun-2008, at 18:30, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>>
>>> I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
>>> ethernet port. I'd
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:04:52PM +0200, oneman wrote:
> On 28-jun-2008, at 18:30, Gregory Seidman wrote:
>
>> I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
>> ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to
>> replace the (wired only) LinkSys I have now
oneman wrote:
On 28-jun-2008, at 18:30, Gregory Seidman wrote:
I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to
replace
the (wired only) LinkSys I have now. It only has one PCI slot, but I want
to be abl
On 28-jun-2008, at 18:30, Gregory Seidman wrote:
I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to
replace
the (wired only) LinkSys I have now. It only has one PCI slot, but
I want
to be able to provide
I have a mini case with a VIA motherboard and CPU. It has an on-board
ethernet port. I'd like to use it as a Linux firewall/NAT router to replace
the (wired only) LinkSys I have now. It only has one PCI slot, but I want
to be able to provide both wired and wireless LAN access. I'm looking for
both
"Eduardo M KALINOWSKI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, I see 192.168.0.3 (zero) in /etc/hosts_allow, and 169.168.1.3
> (one) in the hosts file. If this is not a typo, could as well be the
> cause.
Yes! That was it. It was a typo, and correcting it lets me now use the
laptop to get into my
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Haines Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > Haines Brown wrote:
> >> debug1: Server will not fork when running in debugging mode.
> >> debug1: rexec start in 4 out 4 newsock 4 pipe -1 sock 7
> >> debug1
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Haines Brown wrote:
>> debug1: Server will not fork when running in debugging mode.
>> debug1: rexec start in 4 out 4 newsock 4 pipe -1 sock 7
>> debug1: inetd sockets after dupping: 3, 3
>> debug1: Connection refused by tcp wrappe
>
> The
Haines Brown wrote:
> Eduardo, I did this:
>
> $ sudo /usr/sbin/sshd -d -p
> ...
> Server listening on :: port .
> debug1: Bind to port on 0.0.0.0.
>
> Then in an other terminal I did this:
>
> $ sudo /usr/bin/ssh -p localhost
> ssh_exchange_identification: Connecti
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With that sshd running in debug mode in port (or any other), try
> also connecting to locahost on port (ssh -p localhost) to see
> if any helpful messages come out.
Eduardo, I did this:
$ sudo /usr/sbin/sshd -d -p
...
S
Haines Brown wrote:
> Well, this might be useful. When you say that I should try ssh
> localhost, this is what I understand you to mean:
>
> $ ssh localhost
> ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
>
This rules out problems with the network, at least.
> If I understo
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So we can assume the machines are communicating, it's just ssh that
> does not work. (It'd be interesting to try some other service,
> though.)
>
> See if there is any kind of firewall or access control, check the sshd
> configuration (try ssh'ing
Haines Brown wrote:
Yes, my desktop connects to the wireless router by CAT5, while the
laptop connects to the router by wifi. So I should simply be able to do
$ ssh teufel and be taken to the user's home directory on teufel, and
when prompted for PW, supply teufel user's PW. Right?
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:39:11PM -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> I have a laptop (sidux on Thinkpad X61s) that connects via wi-fi to
> the wireless router connected to my desktop machine (etch) via CAT5,
> which has the name "teufel".
>
> I can connect to the router,
Jeff D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You might need to access the router from your desktop at first.
I'm not sure I follow you. Are you suggesting that I connect my laptop
via CAT4 to the router rather than rely on wifi? In any case, I'll try
it.
> I seem to remember a lot of routers only allow
"Eduardo M KALINOWSKI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Haines Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have a laptop (sidux on Thinkpad X61s) that connects via wi-fi to
>> the wireless router connected to my desktop machine (e
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Haines Brown wrote:
> I have a laptop (sidux on Thinkpad X61s) that connects via wi-fi to
> the wireless router connected to my desktop machine (etch) via CAT5,
> which has the name "teufel".
>
> I can connect to the router, which I name "r
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Haines Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a laptop (sidux on Thinkpad X61s) that connects via wi-fi to
> the wireless router connected to my desktop machine (etch) via CAT5,
> which has the name "teufel".
>
> I can conn
I have a laptop (sidux on Thinkpad X61s) that connects via wi-fi to
the wireless router connected to my desktop machine (etch) via CAT5,
which has the name "teufel".
I can connect to the router, which I name "router", by:
$ ssh router
but then I'm stuck with the
You are right! Thanks!
--- Raj Kiran Grandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Serena Cantor wrote:
> > I have 2 PCs that are connected to wireless router, which is connected to
> > a cable modem. Now
> I
> > want one PC to be a Web server, so people all over t
Serena Cantor wrote:
I have 2 PCs that are connected to wireless router, which is connected to a
cable modem. Now I
want one PC to be a Web server, so people all over the world can access it on
Internet. Since the
two PCs form a private network, how should I set up?
Most routers support
I have 2 PCs that are connected to wireless router, which is connected to a
cable modem. Now I
want one PC to be a Web server, so people all over the world can access it on
Internet. Since the
two PCs form a private network, how should I set up?
Or should I connect the Web server directly to
; >
> > > I don't quite follow you. Can you explain in more detail?
> > >
> > > Celejar
> >
> > Ok, Assuming your wireless router can use an open Linux distribution
> > or your wireless router connects directly to a linux firewall, you can
&
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:57:45 +1000
"Adrian Levi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/13/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:18:19 +1000
>
>
>
> > I don't quite follow you. Can you explain in more detail?
> &g
On 8/13/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:18:19 +1000
> I don't quite follow you. Can you explain in more detail?
>
> Celejar
Ok, Assuming your wireless router can use an open Linux distribution
or your wireless router connects directly t
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:18:19 +1000
"Adrian Levi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/13/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:02:05 +0100
> > Liam O'Toole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:06:15 + (UTC)
> > > Simon Brandmair <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 8/13/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:02:05 +0100
> Liam O'Toole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:06:15 + (UTC)
> > Simon Brandmair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Please notice, that filtering by mac address doesn't really add any
>
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:02:05 +0100
Liam O'Toole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:06:15 + (UTC)
> Simon Brandmair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please notice, that filtering by mac address doesn't really add any
> > extra security. The mac address can easily be changed wi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:06:15 + (UTC)
Simon Brandmair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please notice, that filtering by mac address doesn't really add any
> extra security. The mac address can easily be changed with ifconfig,
> which is IMO default on every Debian machine.
While it is true that th
Hi!
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:10:07 +0200 Serena Cantor wrote:
> Thanks! I'll try MAC filter later on.
>
> --- steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Serena Cantor wrote:
>> > I knew WEP can do it. but the password is the same, any user can let
>> > others use the router by
>> > giving them the pa
Thanks! I'll try MAC filter later on.
--- steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Serena Cantor wrote:
> > I knew WEP can do it. but the password is the same, any user can let others
> > use the router by
> > giving them the password.
> >
> > Can the wir
Serena Cantor wrote:
I knew WEP can do it. but the password is the same, any user can let others use
the router by
giving them the password.
Can the wireless router owner determine who can use the router?
Why the wireless hasn't a address like a ethernet card has, so that the router
I knew WEP can do it. but the password is the same, any user can let others use
the router by
giving them the password.
Can the wireless router owner determine who can use the router?
Why the wireless hasn't a address like a ethernet card has, so that the router
can determine which
addres
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
