On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 12:30:41PM +0200, Lajos Mester wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 October 2003 11:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:13:23AM +0200, Lajos Mester wrote:
> > > No one borns with the GREAT LINUX KNOWLEDGE allready preloaded in the
> > > mind, as you. Sorry.
> >
> > Or
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 11:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:13:23AM +0200, Lajos Mester wrote:
> > No one borns with the GREAT LINUX KNOWLEDGE allready preloaded in the
> > mind, as you. Sorry.
>
> Or, apparently, the ability to read the very first paragraph on
> http://deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:13:23AM +0200, Lajos Mester wrote:
> No one borns with the GREAT LINUX KNOWLEDGE allready preloaded in the mind, as
> you. Sorry.
Or, apparently, the ability to read the very first paragraph on
http://debian.org/. Now grow
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 04:20, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Lajos Mester wrote:
> > oh, my little scrarry admin.
> > You have also a driving licence, but, are you a race-car-driver? Guess
> > not.
>
> His attempt was more like attempting to drive on a freewa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> References, please? What's COLA? Where can I read about it?
COLA is comp.os.linux.advocacy
> What's slashcrap?
A derogatory name for Slashdot.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTEC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Lajos Mester wrote:
> oh, my little scrarry admin.
> You have also a driving licence, but, are you a race-car-driver? Guess not.
His attempt was more like attempting to drive on a freeway without a
license, w
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:21:04 -0500,
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Marc Wilson wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:12:41PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Please see the advocacy howto and the output of "dict troll".
> >>
> >>
> >
> >No off
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:12:41PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
Please see the advocacy howto and the output of "dict troll".
No offense, but most of the "advocates" should be shot. Have you never
read COLA? Or slashcrap?
References, please? What's COLA? Where can I r
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:12:41PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> Please see the advocacy howto and the output of "dict troll".
No offense, but most of the "advocates" should be shot. Have you never
read COLA? Or slashcrap?
--
Marc Wilson | BOFH excuse #92: Stale file handle (next time use
* Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031011 02:15]:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 09:23:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > HAHAHHA! What even makes you think that? Debian is an OS. It
> > > doesn't run on other OS's, it *is* one. Did you even read the web
> > > page (http://debian.org/) to avoid
On Saturday 11 October 2003 10:08, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:47:23PM -0400, Ef Reb wrote:
> > Will Debian run on Windows NT 4? I've an intel 233 processor. If so
> > which version.
>
> HAHAHHA! What even makes you think that? Debian is an OS.
* Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:15:46AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:04:53AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > its appearance. I'd suggest applying Occam's razor: the simplest
> >
> > For those who don't know Occam's Razor, it's sometime
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 11:02, Pigeon wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:15:46AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:04:53AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > its appearance. I'd suggest applying Occam's razor: the simplest
> >
> > For those who don't know Occam's Razor, it's s
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:01, Pigeon wrote:
>
> I am used to conversations that start like this:
>
> "My TV's not working, can you fix it?"
> "Er... what's wrong with it?"
> "It doesn't work."
>
> ...and carry on in the same vein for far too long. IMO the idiocy of
> the questions is a good sign that
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 05:59:13 -0700,
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 08:50:31AM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> > There was more after that, but I couldn't bring myself to keep
>
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:15:46AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:04:53AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > its appearance. I'd suggest applying Occam's razor: the simplest
>
> For those who don't know Occam's Razor, it's sometimes also called
> Bob's Motto (Bob being the nam
Am Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:30:22 +0200 schrieb Ef Reb:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Will Debian run on Windows NT 4? I've an intel 233 processor. If so
> which version.
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <!--
> /* Style
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 08:50:31AM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> There was more after that, but I couldn't bring myself to keep reading.
> Clearly, their database was not setup to cope with anything other than
> MS OSes. I had a pretty good laugh ou
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:47:23PM -0400, Ef Reb wrote:
Will Debian run on Windows NT 4? I've an intel 233 processor. If so
which version.
HAHAHHA! What even makes you think that? Debian is an OS. It
doesn't run on other OS's, it *is* one. Did you even re
Op za 11-10-2003, om 11:18 schreef Paul Johnson:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 09:23:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > HAHAHHA! What even makes you think that? Debian is an OS. It
> > > doesn't run on other OS's, it *is* one. Did you even read the web
> > > page (http://debian.org/) to avoid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 09:23:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > HAHAHHA! What even makes you think that? Debian is an OS. It
> > doesn't run on other OS's, it *is* one. Did you even read the web
> > page (http://debian.org/) to avoid looking like
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:08:24AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:47:23PM -0400, Ef Reb wrote:
> > Will Debian run on Windows NT 4? I've an intel 233 processor. If so
> > which version.
>
> HAHAHHA! What even makes you think that? Debian is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:04:53AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> its appearance. I'd suggest applying Occam's razor: the simplest
For those who don't know Occam's Razor, it's sometimes also called
Bob's Motto (Bob being the name of all Tech Support rep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:47:23PM -0400, Ef Reb wrote:
> Will Debian run on Windows NT 4? I've an intel 233 processor. If so
> which version.
HAHAHHA! What even makes you think that? Debian is an OS. It
doesn't run on other O
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:09:01PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
>
> >Your question makes no sense.
> >
> >Debian is an entire operating system and does not run "on" another
> >operating
> >system.
> >
> >If you have something like VMware installed on your NT 4 system,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 03:32:03PM -0700, Cam Ellison wrote:
>
> Oh, my!
> It's not an application.
> Debian will replace your NT4 and make your 233 run better.
>
> Cam
>
> --
> Cam Ellison Ph.D. R.Psych.
(Be careful what you are praying for: it might replace YOU.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:09:01PM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
> >Your question makes no sense.
> >
> >Debian is an entire operating system and does not run "on" another
> >operating system.
> >
> >If you have something like VMware installed on your NT 4 system, then
>
On Friday 10 October 2003 7:09 pm, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>That message is actually from an email address harvesting spambot of
>some sort. We've been seening these on the list for the last few weeks.
And it's also HTML format which is another red flag.
Jeff Elkins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
Your question makes no sense.
Debian is an entire operating system and does not run "on" another operating
system.
If you have something like VMware installed on your NT 4 system, then Debian
can run in that.
Other than that, you would have to set up your system to dual-
> -Original Message-
> From: Ef Reb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 4:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: windows NT
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Will Debian run on Windows NT 4? I've an intel 233 processor. If so which
version.
* Ef Reb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Will Debian run on Windows NT 4? I've an intel 233 processor. If so
> which version.
>
Oh, my!
It's not an application.
Debian will replace your NT4 and make your 233 run better.
Cam
--
Cam Ellison Ph.D.
Hi,
Will Debian run on Windows NT 4? I’ve an intel 233
processor. If so which version.
thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 20 June 2003 06:45 pm, Abdul Latip wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since I am not so familiar with Windows NT/2000/XP,
> I am wonder which are the good "Windows Clue for Linux
> users" webpages on web. Any URL?
>
> Basically,
On Saturday 21 June 2003 04:45 am, Abdul Latip wrote:
> 1. The most simple way to return control to LILO after
>reconfiguring Windows.
Installing ("reconfiguring?") windows replaces the mbr that lilo installed for
it's own. Just boot with rescue disk, and reinstall lilo in the mbr.
> 2. How t
On Fri, June 20 at 10:45 PM EDT
Abdul Latip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. How to read the linux files systems (ext2,ext3,reiserfs)
>in Windows.
Sorry I can only answer this one:
http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/explore2fs.htm
It is called explore2fs and for me has worked flawlessly.
Hi
Since I am not so familiar with Windows NT/2000/XP,
I am wonder which are the good "Windows Clue for Linux
users" webpages on web. Any URL?
Basically, some of the problems are that I am usually asked
are:
1. The most simple way to return control to LILO after
reconfiguring
Hi Guys,
I have a friend who is going through uni, and has been asked to provide a
comparison of Linux vs Windows NT in answer to this question:
"Microsoft NT has so many problems that serious consideration is being given
to changing to the Linux platform."
and the question is:
Renai LeMay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Being a linux/bsd admin, he asked me. Now I don't have the time or the
> inclination to research it for him :) But I'd like to know if anyone out
> there has any links in their bookmarks dir which he would find helpful
> (keeping in mind the fact that he
h uni, and has been asked to provide a
> comparison of Linux vs Windows NT in answer to this question:
>
> "Microsoft NT has so many problems that serious consideration is being given
> to changing to the Linux platform."
> and the question is: "Is Linux really an
Andrew J. Perrin wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have a friend who is going through uni, and has been asked to provide a
> comparison of Linux vs Windows NT in answer to this question:.
According to the quote item, I recomend to read following contribution:
http://www.unix-vs-
ay wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I have a friend who is going through uni, and has been asked to provide a
> > comparison of Linux vs Windows NT in answer to this question:
> >
> > "Microsoft NT has so many problems that serious consideration is being
>
on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:52:18AM +, Sebastian Drews ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Renai LeMay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Being a linux/bsd admin, he asked me. Now I don't have the time or the
> > inclination to research it for him :) But I'd like to know if anyone out
> > there has any
ubsection
> EndSection
>
>
>
>
> If you can't figure it out, read the XFree86-HOWTO. You can find this in
> /usr/doc/HOWTO or on www.linux.com.
>
> I hope this helps you!
>
>
>
> -
> On 09-Jul-99 A Benchissou wrote
HOWTO. You can find this in
/usr/doc/HOWTO or on www.linux.com.
I hope this helps you!
-
On 09-Jul-99 A Benchissou wrote:
> I would like to get the driver for Windows NT of the ATI 3D RAGE PRO AGP
> video card.
>
> Can you help me ??
>
> Tha
I would like to get the driver for Windows NT of the ATI 3D RAGE PRO AGP
video card.
Can you help me ??
Thanks & regards
ALAIN BENCHISSOU
--
CADLM
9, rue Raoul Dautry
91190 Gif/Yvette
Tel : 33 1 69072922
Fax : 33 1 69072809
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:00 PM 5/10/1999 +, Shawn Nguyen wrote:
>Hi,
>
> Has anyone been able to get wine to work with windows NT? If so, can
> you
>help me with the setup? Any help or hint would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Shawn Nguyen
I'm not entirely sure what you mean; do
Hi,
Has anyone been able to get wine to work with windows NT? If so, can
you
help me with the setup? Any help or hint would be greatly appreciated.
Shawn Nguyen
I wouldn't install samba just for storing mp3 in NT partition. I will make a
separate partition with FAT system, then I
can just copy them over in Linux.
Wayne Topa wrote:
> Subject: Windows NT && Samba
> Date: Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 12:35:58AM -0500
>
>
Subject: Windows NT && Samba
Date: Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 12:35:58AM -0500
In reply to:Chris Hoover
Quoting Chris Hoover([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I was wondering if it was possible to use samba and have my linux box be able
> to read/write on my NT box. I would l
You don't need Samba if you just want to use a Linux Workstation to write
to an NT hard drive. You only need Samba if you want to allow Windows
read/write access on Linux.
To write from Linux to NT, install the smbfs package for kernel 2.0, or
smbfsx for 2.2. Then, build your kernel with either in
I was wondering if it was possible to use samba and have my linux box be able
to read/write on my NT box. I would like to do this since my NT box has more
hd space right now, and I'm in need of a place to store my mp3's.
Thanks,
chris
On Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 11:16:49PM -0500, Alec Smith wrote:
> No big traps that I can think of. I'm actually running NT+Linux on this
> very machine. I prefer copying the Linux boot sector and using the NT boot
> loader. Its nice being able to use the arrow keys and not have to type
> anything as L
Linux, four partitions, everything is
> fine. I'd prefer to be 100% Linux, but something just came up where
> I'll have to use Windows a bit.
>
> I've got a copy of Windows NT that came with my computer, and I've had
> NT plus Linux running happily together und
At 09:56 PM 3/3/99 -0600, Matt Garman wrote:
>
>I have Windows 95 installed with Linux, four partitions, everything is
>fine. I'd prefer to be 100% Linux, but something just came up where
>I'll have to use Windows a bit.
>
>I've got a copy of Windows NT that c
I have Windows 95 installed with Linux, four partitions, everything is
fine. I'd prefer to be 100% Linux, but something just came up where
I'll have to use Windows a bit.
I've got a copy of Windows NT that came with my computer, and I've had
NT plus Linux running happily tog
Hi!
Jay Barbee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
"Re: Synchronizing Windows NT to Debian.":
> There is a program called Tardis that has client and server time services.
> Seems pretty powerfull:
Yes, I know, but Greg Frye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) already mentioned it.
> Does NT's &
At 1/25/99 08:36 PM +0100, Rainer Clasen wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Greg Frye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
>"Re: Synchronizing Windows NT to Debian.":
>
>> There is a precompiled binary of xntp3 for NT if you want the NT box to
>> be a time server that sync's to the Debian bo
Hi!
Greg Frye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
"Re: Synchronizing Windows NT to Debian.":
> There is a precompiled binary of xntp3 for NT if you want the NT box to
> be a time server that sync's to the Debian box. It you just want the NT
> box to be a client, I like Tardis
fo at "http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/";
Greg
Sergey Imennov wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I set up Debian to synchronize it's clock thru
> xntp with some of the servers on the internet.
> Now I'm wondering if I can synchronize a Windows
pgpAJDyLJd979.pgp
Description: PGP message
Hi,
Can anyone advise me a good (POP3) e-mail client (for debian)
which can read a mail box shared by both linux and Windows NT4
on the same PC ?
Our mailserver is now Netscape Mail/Windows NT but in the future
will be migrated to Qmail/Unix.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Marc
How can I mount and read a CD created on windows NT. I have parallel port
HP cdriter. I could not install it on Debian so the easiest was to copy
stuff to my fat partition ad then dual boot into NT and copy the files
from there to the CD. I did that, but I cannot mount it on Debian
>This is the second time I am posting this message, since I find it
>really hard to believe that no one in this list was able to suggest a
>solution. I will be really thankful if someone can help me with this
>question:
I'm not sure how you missed this because it's been an oft repeated
question..
Salam Arifi!
You need an iso9660 aware burning tool on NT.
Don't listen to thoose who say this can't or shouldn't be done... I
have Debian 2.0 Distribution and Contrib CD's I made on the the NT
machine at work.
You need to download this (free software):
ftp://ftp.cdarchive.com/pub/goldenhawk/do
On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Arifi Koseoglu wrote:
: Hello again,
:
: This is the second time I am posting this message, since I find it
: really hard to believe that no one in this list was able to suggest a
: solution. I will be really thankful if someone can help me with this
: question:
:
:
burn my CD's. I don't really like
booting into Windows NT just to burn CD's, and besides, I don't like
Windows NT as much as Linux :-)
I am using the latest 2.1.x kernels, mkeisfs/mkhybrid and cdrecord to
burn CD's with an external HP SureStore 7100e and haven't had any
prob
From: Arifi Koseoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello again,
>
> This is the second time I am posting this message, since I > find it really
> hard to believe that no one in this list was able > to suggest a solution. I
> will be really thankful if someone can > help me with this q
On Thu, 13 Aug 1998 09:57:25 +0300, you scribbled:
>Hello again,
>
>This is the second time I am posting this message, since I find it
>really hard to believe that no one in this list was able to suggest a
>solution. I will be really thankful if someone can help me with this
>question:
>
>I downlo
Hello again,
This is the second time I am posting this message, since I find it
really hard to believe that no one in this list was able to suggest a
solution. I will be really thankful if someone can help me with this
question:
I downloaded the Debian CD images, and unsuccessfully tried to write
hink that you have compiled samba with encrypted passwords. Therefore
smbclient uses them too. I'm not sure if smbmount is capable of logging in
with Windows NT encrypted passwords (don't think so). If anybody has done
this before, please let me know also. I tried it without success.
Re
Question
I've been doing a little research and smbmount looks like it is going to do
what I want. I want to make a sharepoint on my NT workstation Sp3
accessable under a directory on my Debian linux machine(Hamm) just like a
fdd or a cdrom.
Now my question I've got everything installed it requi
seconds. The link comes backup again in 19-20
> seconds and goes back down again after 36-37 seconds.
>
> The local area network has Windows NT and Windows 95 machines.
>
> I am running the standard filter that comes with Diald.
>
> I need some advice on:
>
> 1.
Butch Kemper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. What is causing the link to yo-yo and how to change the Windows
> boxes to stop the yo-yo from happening.
Doesn't diald come with some sort of monitor program? (use 'dpkg -L
diald' to see what comes with diald) I think it's called '
after 36-37 seconds.
The local area network has Windows NT and Windows 95 machines.
I am running the standard filter that comes with Diald.
I need some advice on:
1. What is causing the link to yo-yo and how to change the Windows
boxes to stop the yo-yo from happening
-0700 (PDT)
> From: "Stephen A. Witt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Michael Laing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Cross-compile to Windows NT
> Resent-Date: 17 Jul 1998 18:15:15 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
&g
Benoit Goudreault-Emond wrote:
>
> I'll assume the thing was written in C.
It is.
>
> Well. Don't expect it to work out of the box. But if it uses only
> the standard library, you may have luck with the mingw32 stuff at:
>
> http://www.d.shuttle.de/isil/cpd/mingw32-cpd.html
>
This looks li
I'll assume the thing was written in C.
Well. Don't expect it to work out of the box. But if it uses only
the standard library, you may have luck with the mingw32 stuff at:
http://www.d.shuttle.de/isil/cpd/mingw32-cpd.html
I haven't tried it myself, as I usually compile from Win95. BUT I've
You might be interested in the Cygnus GNU/win32 project.
It's possible both setting up a cross linux->NT and building gcc+binutils
for native NT operation. Check out
http://www.cygnus.com/misc/gnu-win32/ -- GNUwin32 project home
http://www.lexa.ru/sos/ -- Sergei Okhapkin's home pag
On Fri, 17 Jul 1998, Michael Laing wrote:
> I have a large utility program that I need to run under NT - is there a
> cross-compiler for this purpose?
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
>
Yeah, 'gcc' (assuming it is written in C).
Cross-compiling really means compiling a set of source files into an
exe
I have a large utility program that I need to run under NT - is there a
cross-compiler for this purpose?
Thanks,
Michael
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Brian Morgan wrote:
> Below is a story by ZDnet about Linux that just came out today. Thought
> you might be interested in reading it. Coincidentally, another story
> came out from ZDnet today about Microsoft "winning one" in the DOJ
> battle. Sounds like a good time for MS
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 02:07:37PM -0400, Brian Morgan wrote:
> Below is a story by ZDnet about Linux that just came out today. Thought
> you might be interested in reading it. Coincidentally, another story
> came out from ZDnet today about Microsoft "winning one" in the DOJ
> battle. Sounds lik
.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_2241.html
Title: Story: How Linux Could Kill
Hummm, not sure what to say. Yes, I knew that these were to prevent
spoofing and since I could not find any other place where ipfwadm
commands were issued, the defaults for ipfwadm appeared to be 'deny'
(which of course makes sense).
It further seemd to me that /etc/netbase is the logical locatio
Correction...
I have not found any reference to a configuration tool that would work
on my system!
I did try 'dotfile ipfwadm' a couple of time but it did not work for
me and I have not yet attempted to find out why not.
On Tue, May 05, 1998 at 08:01:00AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> Bill Lea
Paul,
I created a shell script and put it in the /etc/rc.boot directory.
Works for me.
Steve Mayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
iquest wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm jumping ahead of myself. I thought the ipfwadm command
> was just some monitoring utilitiy and I was certainly wrong.
>
> After ente
On Tue, May 05, 1998 at 09:44:56AM -0400, Bill Leach wrote:
> The file '/etc/init.d/netbase' has the commands for setting up you
> IP-Masquerading. The defaults that I have seen are always to deny.
^^^
No, they don't. There are some firewall setup commands only:
# deny inco
Bill Leach wrote:
>
> The file '/etc/init.d/netbase' has the commands for setting up you
> IP-Masquerading. The defaults that I have seen are always to deny.
> I have looked and not found any reference to a configuration tool so
> I just added the necessary commands directly to the file.
admin/d
root0 May 4 23:21 wireless
>
> My /etc/modules
> ntfs
> tulip
> ip_masq_ftp
> ip_masq_raudio
> ip_masq_irc
> ip_masq_cuseeme
> ip_masq_vdolive
> ip_masq_quake
>
>
> Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently connectin
Hi All,
I'm jumping ahead of myself. I thought the ipfwadm command
was just some monitoring utilitiy and I was certainly wrong.
After entering all the ipfwadm commands, everything works
as expected. I, however, still have some question on where
to put these ipfwadm commands so when
attenberger
On Mon, 4 May 1998, iquest wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently connecting to the internet from the Debian/Linux
> box. I'd like to know how would I go about access the internet
> from other PCs (windows/nt) which are on the same network as my
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm connecting to internet through PPP dialup.
>
> I've recompiled the kernel with all IP-Masquerade and configured
> one of my NT4.0 box as described in the IP-Masquerade Mini-HOWTO
> and it did not work.
>
> My Linux box has the IP address: 192.168.188.2
> My NT4.0 has IP
-Original Message-
From: iquest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Debian User
Date: Tuesday, 5 May 1998 10:09
Subject: Re: Internet from Windows/NT thru Linux
>Hi,
>
> I'm connecting to internet through PPP dialup.
>
>
to know how would I go about access the internet
> from other PCs (windows/nt) which are on the same network as my
> Linux box.
>
> You should probably mention whether you are accessing the internet
> through PPP dialup or through Ethernet. Once you tell us, we can
-Original Message-
From: iquest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian User
Date: Tuesday, 5 May 1998 7:49
Subject: Internet from Windows/NT thru Linux
>Hi,
>
> I'm currently connecting to the internet from the Debian/Linux
> box. I'd like to know how would I
> I'm currently connecting to the internet from the Debian/Linux
> box. I'd like to know how would I go about access the internet
> from other PCs (windows/nt) which are on the same network as my
> Linux box.
The keyword you are looking for is "IP Masquerading&
I'm currently connecting to the internet from the Debian/Linux
box. I'd like to know how would I go about access the internet
from other PCs (windows/nt) which are on the same network as my
Linux box.
You should probably mention whether you are accessing the intern
Hi,
I'm currently connecting to the internet from the Debian/Linux
box. I'd like to know how would I go about access the internet
from other PCs (windows/nt) which are on the same network as my
Linux box.
Thanks!
--
Timothy C. Phan
Intelligence Quest Research, IN
On Thu, Jan 15, 1998 at 12:59:25PM -0400, Adam Greene wrote:
> This is the output from my Linux box that won't attach to my network:
That looks fine; what problem are you seeing?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ft
This is the output from my Linux box that won't
attach to my network:
boot.info
Description: Binary data
ethernet.info
Description: Binary data
route.info
Description: Binary data
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
