Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-24 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:27:48PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > Brian Nelson wrote: > > >>is there any reason ? or is there a new installer in > >>project > >> > >> > > > >In addition to the reasons listed in Ken's post, I don't think anaconda > >integrates particularly well with Debian.

Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-24 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:22:09PM -0700, belahcene abdelkader wrote: > I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use the > anaconda as > installer. It is very easy for installation ! > I just tried the new version sarge, it is still > complicate for new user > !!! > is there any reason ? or

Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-24 Thread John Summerfield
Brian Nelson wrote: is there any reason ? or is there a new installer in project In addition to the reasons listed in Ken's post, I don't think anaconda integrates particularly well with Debian. On the contrary, it's been done and I suspect the workforce was two people of whom one was pa

Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-24 Thread John Summerfield
Kent West wrote: belahcene abdelkader wrote: --- Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:22:09PM -0700, belahcene abdelkader wrote: I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use the anaconda as installer. It is very easy for installation ! Easy is s

Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-23 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:22:09PM -0700, belahcene abdelkader wrote: > I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use the > anaconda as > installer. It is very easy for installation ! > I just tried the new version sarge, it is still > complicate for new user > !!! http://platform.progeny.com

Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-23 Thread Tom Allison
Kent West wrote: anaconda as installer. It is very easy for installation ! The general answers given are: Thank you for an excellent response. I would like to augment this a bit more with what I had to go through in order to install Debian on my 3 machines. First: I used the USB Mass Storage dev

Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-23 Thread Kent West
belahcene abdelkader wrote: --- Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:22:09PM -0700, belahcene abdelkader wrote: I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use the anaconda as installer. It is very easy for installation ! Easy is subjective.

Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-23 Thread belahcene abdelkader
--- Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:22:09PM -0700, belahcene > abdelkader wrote: > > I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use > the > > anaconda as > > installer. It is very easy for installation ! > > Easy is subjective. Easy for what? How? OK ; Fir

Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-23 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 23 August 2004 14:22, belahcene abdelkader wrote: > I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use the > anaconda as > installer. It is very easy for installation ! > I just tried the new version sarge, it is still > complicate for new user

Re: why not anaconda installer

2004-08-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:22:09PM -0700, belahcene abdelkader wrote: > I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use the > anaconda as > installer. It is very easy for installation ! Easy is subjective. Easy for what? How? Whom? Which aspect is easy? > I just tried the new version sarge, it

why not anaconda installer

2004-08-23 Thread belahcene abdelkader
I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use the anaconda as installer. It is very easy for installation ! I just tried the new version sarge, it is still complicate for new user !!! is there any reason ? or is there a new installer in project best regards bela = _