Re: which echo understand \n

On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 05:03:09PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hi, > > The /bin/echo I used to use in Solaris understand \n and \t stuffs > by default. Is there any trick I can play so that I don't need to > specify the -e parameter for echo? use printf instead. pri

Re: which echo understand \n

On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 05:03:09PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hi, > > The /bin/echo I used to use in Solaris understand \n and \t stuffs > by default. Is there any trick I can play so that I don't need to > specify the -e parameter for echo? > > The reason I'm askin

Re: which echo understand \n

Perhaps making an alias for echo to echo -e will work. Ron Rademaker On Thu, 1 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hi, > > The /bin/echo I used to use in Solaris understand \n and \t stuffs > by default. Is there any trick I can play so that I don't need to > specify the

which echo understand \n

hi, The /bin/echo I used to use in Solaris understand \n and \t stuffs by default. Is there any trick I can play so that I don't need to specify the -e parameter for echo? The reason I'm asking is that debian is the only un*x I've used that /bin/echo don't interprate \n..