Hi, David:
On Monday 13 December 2010 02:54:05 David Jardine wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:31:03AM +0100, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> > Hi, Tom:
> >
> > On Friday 10 December 2010 12:04:33 Tom Furie wrote:
[...]
> > > Why? What's the difference between having stable in the source list and
>
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 05:00:02PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Sorry for the noise. I read your sentence as 'squeeze becomes stable'
> not as 'change your apt.sources another time'.
That's okay, it always gets confusing when referring to different things
by different names in different co
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:31:03AM +0100, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> Hi, Tom:
>
> On Friday 10 December 2010 12:04:33 Tom Furie wrote:
> > On 10/12/2010 10:04, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> > > On Thursday 09 December 2010 21:05:00 Tom Furie wrote:
> > >> As others have mentioned, though you might not
Hi, Tom:
On Friday 10 December 2010 12:04:33 Tom Furie wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 10:04, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 December 2010 21:05:00 Tom Furie wrote:
> >> As others have mentioned, though you might not have seen the replies if
> >> you weren't CC'd on them, you could change from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Furie wrote:
> Why? What's the difference between having stable in the source list and
> automatically upgrading when the new stable is released - all upgrade
> issues *should* be worked out by then - versus switching the codename
> once the new ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Furie wrote:
> On 09/12/2010 22:19, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>
As others have mentioned, though you might not have seen the replies
if you
weren't CC'd on them, you could change from 'testing' to 'squeeze'
now as
they ar
On 10-12-10 8:04 AM, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
Upgrading between releases is typically not just a simple
apt-get/aptitude upgrade (dist-,full-) run. The upgrade process and
things you have to consider when you upgrade are documented in the
release notes and it is a good idea to follow them, as ther
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:04 +, Tom Furie wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 10:04, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> >On Thursday 09 December 2010 21:05:00 Tom Furie wrote:
[…]
>>> you could change from 'testing' to 'squeeze' now as they are
>>> currently the same thing. Then when squeeze goes stable you could
On 10/12/2010 10:04, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010 21:05:00 Tom Furie wrote:
As others have mentioned, though you might not have seen the replies if
you weren't CC'd on them, you could change from 'testing' to 'squeeze'
now as they are currently the same thing. Then when
Hi, Tom:
On Thursday 09 December 2010 21:05:00 Tom Furie wrote:
> On 09/12/2010 18:46, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> > I know it probably is still a long road but want to know when should
> > one change from testing to stable so that one is living in squeeze and
> > not go into wheezy.
>
> As others ha
On 09/12/2010 18:46, shirish शिरीष wrote:
I know it probably is still a long road but want to know when should
one change from testing to stable so that one is living in squeeze and
not go into wheezy.
As others have mentioned, though you might not have seen the replies if
you weren't CC'd
On 09/12/2010 22:19, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
As others have mentioned, though you might not have seen the replies if you
weren't CC'd on them, you could change from 'testing' to 'squeeze' now as
they are currently the same thing. Then when squeeze goes stable you could
change to 'stable', thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
shirish शिरीष wrote:
> At bottom :-
>
> 2010/12/10 Tom Furie :
>
>
>
>> As others have mentioned, though you might not have seen the replies if you
>> weren't CC'd on them, you could change from 'testing' to 'squeeze' now as
>> they are currently t
At bottom :-
2010/12/10 Tom Furie :
> As others have mentioned, though you might not have seen the replies if you
> weren't CC'd on them, you could change from 'testing' to 'squeeze' now as
> they are currently the same thing. Then when squeeze goes stable you could
> change to 'stable', this w
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:16:24 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> I know it probably is still a long road but want to know when should
> one change from testing to stable so that one is living in squeeze and
> not go into wheezy.
(...)
As soon as it gets released. Then you should have to change your
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, shirish शिरीष wrote:
Hi all,
I know it probably is still a long road but want to know when should
one change from testing to stable so that one is living in squeeze and
not go into wheezy.
I use the codenames (lenny, squeeze, etc) in sources.list. This way it
doesn't mat
this is what I use
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-proposed-updates main
contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main
contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main
contrib non-free
j
On Fri, 2010-12-
2010/12/9 shirish शिरीष
> Hi all,
> I know it probably is still a long road but want to know when should
> one change from testing to stable so that one is living in squeeze and
> not go into wheezy.
>
> Below is the sources.list I have.
>
> # Debian Main
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ t
At bottom :-
On 10/12/2010, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Hi all,
> I know it probably is still a long road but want to know when should
> one change from testing to stable so that one is living in squeeze and
> not go into wheezy.
>
> Below is the sources.list I have.
>
> # Debian Main
> deb http://ft
Hi all,
I know it probably is still a long road but want to know when should
one change from testing to stable so that one is living in squeeze and
not go into wheezy.
Below is the sources.list I have.
# Debian Main
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
# Debian Sec
20 matches
Mail list logo
