On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 07:50:11PM +0800, 慕冬亮 wrote:
>
>
> On 03/15/2015 07:37 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >On Sunday 15 March 2015 04:41:00 慕冬亮 wrote:
> >>So If I use "stable" instead of "Jessie" or "Wheezy" , I will have a
> >>rolling release like "archlinux" or "gentoo"!
> >>Is it ???
> >Not "stab
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:37:02 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
Hello Lisi,
>Do you use aptitude? Or can this also be done with apt(-get)?
By and large, I use Synaptic. Occasionally, I use apt-get, but it's
rare.
>And yes, I know that this can be the case - but would you advise a
>newbie, who hadn't ye
On 03/15/2015 08:24 PM, Dalios wrote:
On 03/15/2015 01:50 PM, 慕冬亮 wrote:
On 03/15/2015 07:37 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 15 March 2015 04:41:00 慕冬亮 wrote:
So If I use "stable" instead of "Jessie" or "Wheezy" , I will have a
rolling release like "archlinux" or "gentoo"!
Is it ???
Not "s
On Sunday 15 March 2015 12:00:27 Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:37:25 +
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> Hello Lisi,
>
> >Not "stable", no. If you use "testing" instead of a code name you will
> >effectively have a rolling release, but it will be a very rocky ride
> >for about a month aft
On Sunday 15 March 2015 12:00:09 慕冬亮 wrote:
> On 03/15/2015 07:41 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > In spite of what I have just said, I entirely agree with this advice and
> > have always used code names myself, so that I can control when version
> > changes happen.
> >
> > But then I don't like rolling r
On 03/15/2015 08:10 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 15 March 2015 11:50:11 慕冬亮 wrote:
On 03/15/2015 07:37 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 15 March 2015 04:41:00 慕冬亮 wrote:
So If I use "stable" instead of "Jessie" or "Wheezy" , I will have a
rolling release like "archlinux" or "gentoo"!
Is it
On 03/15/2015 01:50 PM, 慕冬亮 wrote:
>
>
> On 03/15/2015 07:37 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Sunday 15 March 2015 04:41:00 慕冬亮 wrote:
>>> So If I use "stable" instead of "Jessie" or "Wheezy" , I will have a
>>> rolling release like "archlinux" or "gentoo"!
>>> Is it ???
>> Not "stable", no. If you u
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:37:25 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
Hello Lisi,
>Not "stable", no. If you use "testing" instead of a code name you will
>effectively have a rolling release, but it will be a very rocky ride
>for about a month after Jessie becomes Stable.
I've been using 'testing' rather than
On Sunday 15 March 2015 11:50:11 慕冬亮 wrote:
> On 03/15/2015 07:37 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 March 2015 04:41:00 慕冬亮 wrote:
> >> So If I use "stable" instead of "Jessie" or "Wheezy" , I will have a
> >> rolling release like "archlinux" or "gentoo"!
> >> Is it ???
> >
> > Not "stable", n
On 03/15/2015 07:41 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
In spite of what I have just said, I entirely agree with this advice and have
always used code names myself, so that I can control when version changes
happen.
But then I don't like rolling releases. The one rolling release that I have
ever used - PC
On 03/15/2015 07:37 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 15 March 2015 04:41:00 慕冬亮 wrote:
So If I use "stable" instead of "Jessie" or "Wheezy" , I will have a
rolling release like "archlinux" or "gentoo"!
Is it ???
Not "stable", no. If you use "testing" instead of a code name you will
Why ?? I
amaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:08 PM, James
> >>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
> >>>>>> I am following the instructions at:
> &
On Sunday 15 March 2015 04:41:00 慕冬亮 wrote:
> So If I use "stable" instead of "Jessie" or "Wheezy" , I will have a
> rolling release like "archlinux" or "gentoo"!
> Is it ???
Not "stable", no. If you use "testing" instead of a code name you will
effectively have a rolling release, but it will be
heezy to testing.
I am following the instructions at:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90389/how-to-upgrade-debian-stable-wheezy-to-testing-jessie
I get this error when I try apt-update:
W: Failed to fetch cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 7 _Wheezy_ -
Official Snapshot amd64 LIVE/INSTALL Binary
201
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, 慕冬亮 wrote:
>
>
> On 03/15/2015 02:09 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Mar 2015, James wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 03/14/2015 12:47 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:08 PM, James
> >
On 03/15/2015 02:09 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015, James wrote:
On 03/14/2015 12:47 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:08 PM, James wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
I am following the instructions at:
http://unix.stackexchang
On 03/15/2015 12:08 AM, James wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
I am following the instructions at:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90389/how-to-upgrade-debian-stable-wheezy-to-testing-jessie
I have seen this page in detail !
It uses Internet mirror to upgrade
James wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
> I am following the instructions at:
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90389/how-to-upgrade-debian-stable-wheezy-to-testing-jessie
The first problem is that you are not using the official release
notes. Start wit
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015, James wrote:
>
>
> On 03/14/2015 12:47 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:08 PM, James wrote:
> >> I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
> >> I am following the instructions at:
> >> http://unix.s
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 13:14 -0400, James wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2015 12:47 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:08 PM, James wrote:
> >> I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
> >> I am following the instructions at:
> >> http:
On 03/14/2015 12:47 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:08 PM, James wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
I am following the instructions at:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90389/how-to-upgrade-debian-stable-wheezy-to-testing-jessie
I get this
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:45 PM, David Christensen
wrote:
> On 03/14/2015 09:08 AM, James wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
>> I am following the instructions at:
>>
>> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90389/how-to-upgrade-debia
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:08 PM, James wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
> I am following the instructions at:
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90389/how-to-upgrade-debian-stable-wheezy-to-testing-jessie
>
> I get this error when I try apt-update:
&g
On 03/14/2015 09:08 AM, James wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
I am following the instructions at:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90389/how-to-upgrade-debian-stable-wheezy-to-testing-jessie
I get this error when I try apt-update:
W: Failed to fetch cdrom://[Debia
I'm trying to upgrade wheezy to testing.
I am following the instructions at:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90389/how-to-upgrade-debian-stable-wheezy-to-testing-jessie
I get this error when I try apt-update:
W: Failed to fetch cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 7 _Wheezy_ - Official
Sna
I upgraded 64 bit wheezy to testing(Jessie) yesterday. 32 bit wine applications
worked great until I ran apt-get autoremove. This broke quite a few
32 bit wine applications for me. I narrowed it down to two packages
that were autoremoved: libxinerama1:i386 and libxrandr2:i386. Should I file
a bug
26 matches
Mail list logo
