Re: weird X effect

2002-12-03 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:29:47AM -0500, Bruce Park wrote: > Rob, > > I am currently using this in my .Xresources: > lucidasanstypewriter-12 (xfonts-75dpi). > It worked fine in twm and this is the default font I've always been using. > I'm very picky about fonts in my system. What's weird is thi

Re: weird X effect

2002-12-02 Thread Bruce Park
ECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: weird X effect Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 18:03:29 +1100 On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 10:30:07PM -0500, Bruce Park wrote: > Hello all, > > Thanks to many generouse people's advise, I now removed xfonts-100dpi and > am using xfonts-75dpi. Now

Re: weird X effect

2002-12-01 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 10:30:07PM -0500, Bruce Park wrote: > Hello all, > > Thanks to many generouse people's advise, I now removed xfonts-100dpi and > am using xfonts-75dpi. Now one of the main reasons for this transition was > to make emacs look nice but now it looks like there is a problem w

weird X effect

2002-12-01 Thread Bruce Park
Hello all, Thanks to many generouse people's advise, I now removed xfonts-100dpi and am using xfonts-75dpi. Now one of the main reasons for this transition was to make emacs look nice but now it looks like there is a problem with graphics. Please look at the file attatchment and tell me what I