On Thursday 03 July 2014 21:19:10 Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> Yeah, I can read http://www.asahi.com/
Does that give anyone any ideas? That does seem odd - why "single out"
Bangla??
How big a deal would it be to reinstall?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
Yeah, I can read http://www.asahi.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b5babe.9020...@iut-dhaka.edu
On Thursday 03 July 2014 18:17:53 Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> Reisz,
> I don't have any problem with preconfigured Debian e.g. Debian 7 Wheezy
> GNOME, Xfce etc. But after installing from NetInst, it's creating
> problem for me. Need solution.
My name is Lisi.
I installed Wheezy from netinstall, a
Reisz,
I don't have any problem with preconfigured Debian e.g. Debian 7 Wheezy
GNOME, Xfce etc. But after installing from NetInst, it's creating
problem for me. Need solution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 23:13:31 +0600
Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> B,
> Yeah. Here it is: http://www.priyo.com/
Works spotless (only tried in opera but there's no
reason for iceweasel failure).
PLS, watch your headers 'cos my answer to the ML was
directly thrown to you instead.
--
red dye cau
B,
Yeah. Here it is: http://www.priyo.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b58f3b.8000...@iut-dhaka.edu
On Thursday 03 July 2014 15:37:16 B wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 15:23:02 +0100
>
> Darac Marjal wrote:
> > If in doubt, Wikipedia's usually a good starting point:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengali_script
>
> No problem: sid, iceweasel & opera all render correctly
> Bengali scripting.
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 15:23:02 +0100
Darac Marjal wrote:
> If in doubt, Wikipedia's usually a good starting point:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengali_script
No problem: sid, iceweasel & opera all render correctly
Bengali scripting.
--
Dark_Zezette : you've got a qwerty keyboard ?
Marjo : No
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 04:09:10PM +0200, B wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:50:05 +0600
> Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
>
> > I already installed 'fonts-beng' and others I thought might have
> > been necessary. But that didn't change anything. Any other
> > solution?
>
> Do you have a test URL?
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:50:05 +0600
Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> I already installed 'fonts-beng' and others I thought might have
> been necessary. But that didn't change anything. Any other
> solution?
Do you have a test URL?
--
Among all savage beasts, none is found so harmful as woman.
-- St.
Hi,
I already installed 'fonts-beng' and others I thought might have been
necessary. But that didn't change anything. Any other solution?
-Muntasim Ul Haque
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 02:58:49PM +0600, Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> Hi,
> I installed Debian NetInst with i3wm. I have a problem. Bengali/Bangla fonts
> are not visible in websites; I can only see English fonts. The place of the
> Bengali fonts are shown blank. What can I do?
Try in
Hi,
I installed Debian NetInst with i3wm. I have a problem. Bengali/Bangla
fonts are not visible in websites; I can only see English fonts. The
place of the Bengali fonts are shown blank. What can I do?
With thanks,
Muntasim Ul Haque
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On Wednesday, 14 May, 2014 10:36 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 14/05/14 04:22, Testosticore wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May, 2014 12:04 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 13/05/14 08:07, A Debian User wrote:
On Sunday, 11 May, 2014 10:08 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 11/05/14 22:59, Whit Hansell wrote:
A
On 14/05/14 04:22, Testosticore wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 13 May, 2014 12:04 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 13/05/14 08:07, A Debian User wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 11 May, 2014 10:08 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 11/05/14 22:59, Whit Hansell wrote:
> Am getting frustrated. On the internet today
On Tuesday, 13 May, 2014 12:04 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 13/05/14 08:07, A Debian User wrote:
On Sunday, 11 May, 2014 10:08 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 11/05/14 22:59, Whit Hansell wrote:
Am getting frustrated. On the internet today there are so many sites
that have taken on so much adve
On 13/05/14 08:07, A Debian User wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 11 May, 2014 10:08 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 11/05/14 22:59, Whit Hansell wrote:
>>> Am getting frustrated. On the internet today there are so many sites
>>> that have taken on so much advertising that it is killing my desire to
>>> go
On Sunday, 11 May, 2014 10:08 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 11/05/14 22:59, Whit Hansell wrote:
Am getting frustrated. On the internet today there are so many sites
that have taken on so much advertising that it is killing my desire to
go to various sites. I mean specifically news sites.
My b
On 05/11/2014 09:30 AM, Francesco Ariis wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 08:59:41AM -0400, Whit Hansell wrote:
Am getting frustrated. On the internet today there are so many
sites that have taken on so much advertising that it is killing my
desire to go to various sites. I mean specifically news
Whit Hansell writes:
> Am I missing something in some an additional program I can install to
> help take over or as an addon to Iceweasel browser? This is really
> frustrating and I woiuld appreciate any help anyone can give.
Install Privoxy. It will block ads for and and all browsers.
--
John
On 11/05/14 22:59, Whit Hansell wrote:
> Am getting frustrated. On the internet today there are so many sites
> that have taken on so much advertising that it is killing my desire to
> go to various sites. I mean specifically news sites.
>
> My box is a relatively new AMD quad core over 3 Gh, 16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/11/2014 08:59 AM, Whit Hansell wrote:
> Am getting frustrated. On the internet today there are so many sites
> that have taken on so much advertising that it is killing my desire
> to go to various sites. I mean specifically news sites.
>
>
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 08:59:41AM -0400, Whit Hansell wrote:
> Am getting frustrated. On the internet today there are so many
> sites that have taken on so much advertising that it is killing my
> desire to go to various sites. I mean specifically news sites.
>
Maybe you already tried it, but
Am getting frustrated. On the internet today there are so many sites
that have taken on so much advertising that it is killing my desire to
go to various sites. I mean specifically news sites.
My box is a relatively new AMD quad core over 3 Gh, 16 Gb Ram and a
video card w. 1 Gb memery on it
Iceweasel's "Awesom bar" history is missing icons for some websites
since upgrade from v7 to v8.
For the explanation of this bug I use the terms of
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/central/ .
For example the icon of http://www.dict.cc/ isn't shown by the "Awesom
b
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 03:57:06 -0700, johhny_at_poland77 wrote:
(...)
> Do you know exploit-db like sites, where can people search for security
> bugs? What's the best place to search? What's the best place to compare
> two softwares/os-es?
I'm not sure if this will help (I know, it's a "lazy" tri
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Gilles Mocellin
wrote:
>
> Yes !
> 600 req/s at Varnish and only 5-10 req/s at Apache behind !
>
> Of course, you'll have to tune and adapt to your site, but really woth it,
> especially with CMS like Drupal, which are very hungry on resources.
>
Thanks Allan & Gi
Le Monday 27 September 2010 12:44:04 Siju George, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Which one is better for Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations for high
> volume websites?
> Varnish or Squid ?
>
> any body using Varnish in production Environments?
Yes !
600 req/s at Varnish a
On 2010-09-27T16:14:04, Siju George wrote:
> Which one is better for Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations for high
> volume websites? Varnish or Squid ?
We are planning on rolling out Varnish in production. Squid is
the grand-daddy. Your favorite search engine should pull up some
benc
Hi,
Which one is better for Asynchronous HTTP Cache Validations for high
volume websites?
Varnish or Squid ?
any body using Varnish in production Environments?
thanks :-)
--Siju
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 10. 09. 2010 11:00:22 je Angus Hedger napisal(a):
>>
>> I would also recommend using a good hosts file! This is the one I use
>> [1], I know its targets at windows, but it still blocks all major ad
>> networks etc. ;)
>>
>
> [Targeted at squid users:]
>
> Iceweasel being as s
Merciadri Luca writes:
> Alberto Luaces wrote:
>> Merciadri Luca writes:
>>
>>
>>> I'm running stable
>>>
>>
>> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/adblock-plus
>>
>>
> Thanks. Works like a charm. I was not aware that one was able to install
> a naviguator's add-on by using aptitude/apt-ge
Dne, 10. 09. 2010 11:00:22 je Angus Hedger napisal(a):
I would also recommend using a good hosts file! This is the one I use
[1], I know its targets at windows, but it still blocks all major ad
networks etc. ;)
[Targeted at squid users:]
Iceweasel being as slow as it is (at least on my syste
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:26:46 +0200
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are sometimes some websites (such as news ones) which make an
> extensive use of flash stuff. Amongst the animations, flash is
> sometimes also used for ads, etc., and I don't like this. Are there
&
Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Merciadri Luca writes:
>
>
>> I'm running stable
>>
>
> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/adblock-plus
>
>
Thanks. Works like a charm. I was not aware that one was able to install
a naviguator's add-on by using aptitude/apt-get !
--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.
Merciadri Luca writes:
> I'm running stable
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/adblock-plus
--
Alberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y6baxac5
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:26:46PM +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are sometimes some websites (such as news ones) which make an
>> extensive use of flash stuff. Amongst the animations, flash is sometimes
>> also used
Alex, you mailed me directly.
I forward to du.
Message original
Sujet: Re: How to get rid of the websites' ads/flash ads, without
loosing their (flash) content?
Date : Thu, 9 Sep 2010 22:08:06 +0100
De :Alex
Pour : rudu
I second the recomendation of AdBlock -
Aak, I hit "reply" instead of "Reply All"...
I second the recomendation of AdBlock - on my slow internet connection, it
makes many pages load literaly 10x faster.
Le 09/09/2010 20:26, Merciadri Luca a écrit :
Hi,
There are sometimes some websites (such as news ones) which make an
extensive use of flash stuff. Amongst the animations, flash is sometimes
also used for ads, etc., and I don't like this. Are there any Iceweasel
tools which can detect thes
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:26:46PM +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are sometimes some websites (such as news ones) which make an
> extensive use of flash stuff. Amongst the animations, flash is sometimes
> also used for ads, etc., and I don't like this. Are
Hi,
There are sometimes some websites (such as news ones) which make an
extensive use of flash stuff. Amongst the animations, flash is sometimes
also used for ads, etc., and I don't like this. Are there any Iceweasel
tools which can detect these ads, or use a public DB to avoid displaying
apache per virtualhost (site) basis, but
is not a problem.
In our case, we use local debian packages to deploy our clients'
websites, for ease of management. That means we'd like to have each one
drop its own file in logrotate.d,
On each site-available/* config file (per site) within &quo
Hi all,
I understand that I can setup a logrotate entry with sharedscripts, so
it will only reload apache once for all the logs in that stanza.
That's fine, until you want to have multiple stanzas.
In our case, we use local debian packages to deploy our clients'
websites, for ease of
Problem Solved tonight by adding this on startup :
sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0"
So netfilter on dom0 is the source of the problem... But i don't know
why just on some service/websites.
--
Guillaume
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.d
So after some days of research I tough the problem come from xen
I've just forgot to tell you the system was running on Xen. Really big
mistake sorry :)
I configure on my dom0 the pppoe connection and it works fine. All
wget on all websites where i have access problem works fines. It
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:03:24AM +0100, Guillaume CHARDIN wrote:
> > wget
> >
> > you can see the size being set in tcpdump.
> >
> > if it still stalls after setting to 1400, try something smaller 900 -
> > just to make sure we are on the right track.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> I've done 4 tests
> a
> wget
>
> you can see the size being set in tcpdump.
>
> if it still stalls after setting to 1400, try something smaller 900 -
> just to make sure we are on the right track.
>
> Alex
>
>
I've done 4 tests
a) tcpdump in non promiscous mode and try to contact via wget
www.microsoft.com with a mtu s
1465 -f 86.64.145.147
> Envoi d'une requête 'ping' sur 86.64.145.147 avec 1465 octets de données :
> Le paquet doit être fragmenté mais paramétré DF.
>--> Same MTU 1464
>
> Same thing on the websites i cannot access
>
> Haha, this issue is starting to mak
e données :
Réponse de 86.64.145.147 : octets=1464 temps=54 ms TTL=55
ping -l 1465 -f 86.64.145.147
Envoi d'une requête 'ping' sur 86.64.145.147 avec 1465 octets de données :
Le paquet doit être fragmenté mais paramétré DF.
--> Same MTU 1464
Same thing on the websites i
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:34:30PM +0100, Guillaume CHARDIN wrote:
> 2009/11/25 Alex Samad :
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:03:52PM +0100, Guillaume CHARDIN wrote:
> >> Hi,
> > [snip]
> > so when you browse from the linux computer running pppoe you have
> > problems ? or only when you have a comput
2009/11/25 Alex Samad :
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:03:52PM +0100, Guillaume CHARDIN wrote:
>> Hi,
> [snip]
> so when you browse from the linux computer running pppoe you have
> problems ? or only when you have a computer behind it.
I don't have any graphical ui on the linux box but a `wget
websi
her computer (winXP) to establish the
> pppoe session it works fine for all websites...
so when you browse from the linux computer running pppoe you have
problems ? or only when you have a computer behind it.
>
> Someone have any idea on whats going on ?
>
> Thanks for your h
Guillaume CHARDIN escreveu:
Hi,
Three weeks ago I had a debian 4 on my network acting as a gateway
with ppp/pppoe. I install from scratch a new debian 5 on this computer
last week.
Since, I experience problem accessing some websites with a timeout for
error, or the browser (firefox or ie
2009/11/25 Leandro Quibem Magnabosco :
> Guillaume CHARDIN escreveu:
> Maybe DNS? :)
> Try a different server and let us know.
>
DNS resolution works fine on all computers (i can get ip address of
all host i ping) i use the dns provided by my ISP. Anyway, i used
change them to openDNS one, but sti
Hi,
Three weeks ago I had a debian 4 on my network acting as a gateway
with ppp/pppoe. I install from scratch a new debian 5 on this computer
last week.
Since, I experience problem accessing some websites with a timeout for
error, or the browser (firefox or ie) indefinitely load the page and
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 16:31 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> That's the USA. Canada is "let's all be nice and do what the gov't
> tells us...".
Like Americans are immune from that stupidity. "Now let's go shopping."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 16:44 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > get a Quebec government webpage in English, never mind making it easy
> > to DL PDF's :) We'll see if they answer.
>
> Whatever happened to "government by the people, for the people"? :-(
Wrong country, for that exact quote (even if it's
> Well everyone, got mail from the webmaster - they say they are
> going to take a look at the problem and say they will try to resolve
> it. In the meantime, they "suggest" I visit using Windows and Adobe:)
> I guess that's not weird software :)
I think that's a polite way of saying "Don't get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:22:18 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I have done so. But in this province (Quebec) anglos are lucky
> > to get a Quebec government webpage in English, never mind making
> > it easy to DL PDF's :) We'll see if they answer.
>
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:31:44 -0500
Ron Johnson wrote:
Hello Ron,
> That's the USA.
Well yes, there it's explicitly stated. However, it's the principle
that democracies are _supposed_ to be based on.
> Canada is "let's all be nice and do what the gov't tells us...".
Unfortunately, true for m
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Real man [1] would never do that.
Real democratic (= "ruling of the people" != "ruling of the companies")
governments would never ask for that.
Happy debianing,
Johannes
[1] and women (but Ron is a man AFAIK)
good morning johannes,
i sha
On 2009-09-03 15:51, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-09-03 09:44, Charles wrote:
Just did that...dl'ed the user agent switcher and tried nearly
all of the combos involving IE and Windowsno luck..same message.
It looks like it's looking for an Adobe plugin which of
On 2009-09-03 10:44, Brad Rogers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:26:46 -0400
Charles wrote:
Hello Charles,
I have done so. But in this province (Quebec) anglos are lucky to
Good to hear that. It's all to easy to let somebody else do it.
ge
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-09-03 09:44, Charles wrote:
>> Just did that...dl'ed the user agent switcher and tried nearly
>> all of the combos involving IE and Windowsno luck..same message.
>> It looks like it's looking for an Adobe plugin which of course I
>> don't have. Just one more rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:48:41 -0500
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-09-03 09:44, Charles wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:27:03 -0400
> > Charles wrote:
> >
> >>> Try changing your browser's User-Agent string to find out.
> >>> Also, firebug might be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:26:46 -0400
Charles wrote:
Hello Charles,
> I have done so. But in this province (Quebec) anglos are lucky to
Good to hear that. It's all to easy to let somebody else do it.
> get a Quebec government webpage in English,
On 2009-09-03 09:44, Charles wrote:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:27:03 -0400
Charles wrote:
Try changing your browser's User-Agent string to find out. Also,
firebug might be useful to debug their Javascript.
I'll give that a shot - if that doesn't work then I might just
give up and read the ma
> I have done so. But in this province (Quebec) anglos are lucky to
> get a Quebec government webpage in English, never mind making it easy
> to DL PDF's :) We'll see if they answer.
I'm pretty sure the same brain-damage can be found on the French side of
the site. That might be taken slightly
On Thursday 03 September 2009 10:47:00 Charles wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:27:52 -0400
> Charles wrote:
> > > Can't you look in the source of the site, and see if the link to
> > > the pdf is named in some javascript function? (firebug is great
> > > for that) Of course not ideal, but it might
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:27:52 -0400
Charles wrote:
>
> > Can't you look in the source of the site, and see if the link to
> > the pdf is named in some javascript function? (firebug is great
> > for that) Of course not ideal, but it might just work.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:12:12 +0200
Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Charles schreef:
> > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:15:05 +0200
> > Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> >> On 2009-09-02 23:44 +0200, Charles wrote:
> >
> >&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:50:05 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:44:29 -0400
> Charles wrote:
>
> Hello Charles,
>
> > all of the combos involving IE and Windowsno luck..same
Charles schreef:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:15:05 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-09-02 23:44 +0200, Charles wrote:
I have run across several websites lately which insist they cannot
download PDF files to you because you don't have Adobe Acrobat
installed.
To say the truth, I c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:44:29 -0400
Charles wrote:
Hello Charles,
> all of the combos involving IE and Windowsno luck..same message.
> It looks like it's looking for an Adobe plugin which of course I
Complain to the site owners, explaining tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:27:03 -0400
Charles wrote:
> >
> > Try changing your browser's User-Agent string to find out. Also,
> > firebug might be useful to debug their Javascript.
>
>
>I'll give that a shot - if that doesn't work then I might j
e:
> >>
> >> > I have run across several websites lately which insist they
> >> > cannot download PDF files to you because you don't have Adobe
> >> > Acrobat installed.
> >>
> > When the cursor is over the item all you see
On 2009-09-03 15:43 +0200, Charles wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:15:05 +0200
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2009-09-02 23:44 +0200, Charles wrote:
>>
>> > I have run across several websites lately which insist they cannot
>> > download PDF files to y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:15:05 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-09-02 23:44 +0200, Charles wrote:
>
> > I have run across several websites lately which insist they cannot
> > download PDF files to you because you don&#x
On 2009-09-02 23:44 +0200, Charles wrote:
> I have run across several websites lately which insist they cannot
> download PDF files to you because you don't have Adobe Acrobat
> installed.
To say the truth, I cannot remember having ever met such a website
myself. Everyone serve
But... not having the necessary plugin, shouldn't the browser just
download the file? Or am i misinterpreting the OP's "sites downloading
to you"?
--
() ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto
/\ ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Charles wrote:
> I have run across several websites lately which insist they cannot
> download PDF files to you because you don't have Adobe Acrobat
> installed.
> I had a look in /usr/bin and there are symlinks named Acrobat,
> Acroread, Ado
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have run across several websites lately which insist they cannot
download PDF files to you because you don't have Adobe Acrobat
installed.
I had a look in /usr/bin and there are symlinks named Acrobat,
Acroread, Adobe Reader, and Adobe R
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:00:07AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/users/
>
> Organizations are listed there only if the submit a request. Many more
> are probably running Debian and are not listed there.
This is very useful promotion tool.
--
Zhengquan
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 01:12:43PM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> nmap -v -A scanme.nmap.org
I am running a sid on my desktop but this does not return I am running
sid..
--
Zhengquan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
re about debian.
>
> This is not about websites, but should help when advocating Debian
>
> http://www.debian.org/users/
>
> Organizations are listed there only if the submit a request. Many more
> are probably running Debian and are not listed there.
That being said, some
>
> 明覺 wrote:
>> If they can report the distribution of linux, that will be more
>> interesting.
Tim McDonough schreef:
> The extent of the report seems to be site specific. I tried several
> other sites and some just simply say "Linux".
What can be found out about your system depends on Apache-s
On Wed,15.Apr.09, 22:46:16, Zhengquan Zhang wrote:
> Dear debian community,
>
> I wonder if there is some official resource that show who is running
> debian on there servers. The boss knows redhat and gentoo and would like
> to know more about debian.
This is not about websites,
The extent of the report seems to be site specific. I tried several
other sites and some just simply say "Linux".
Tim
明覺 wrote:
If they can report the distribution of linux, that will be more interesting.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Tim McDonough wrote:
I know http://uptime.netcraft.co
If they can report the distribution of linux, that will be more interesting.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Tim McDonough wrote:
>> I know http://uptime.netcraft.com keeps some statistics of which sites
>> run which operating systems, but I'm not really sure if they also track
>> different GNU/
I know http://uptime.netcraft.com keeps some statistics of which sites
run which operating systems, but I'm not really sure if they also track
different GNU/Linux Distributions, or even if it's feasible to detect
their differences.
They report the following for a site I'm involved with:
Linux
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 09:46 -0500, Zhengquan Zhang wrote:
> > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=amazon.com
>
> Thanks for this, I can even check for what my server is running:)
Useful form of intrusion detection system, you think?
Though perhaps its unlikely that intruders will go to the
> http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=amazon.com
Thanks for this, I can even check for what my server is running:)
--
Zhengquan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>> Another question, is there a way to test a site like amazon.com running
>> which OS?
> http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=amazon.com
It's more fun to check if the site configured their 404 pages
(although that might not give you the OS), a lot of them don't even
bother. amazon did.
--
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Zhengquan Zhang
wrote:
> Dear debian community,
>
> I wonder if there is some official resource that show who is running
> debian on there servers. The boss knows redhat and gentoo and would like
> to know more about debian.
I know http://uptime.netcraft.com keeps
Dear debian community,
I wonder if there is some official resource that show who is running
debian on there servers. The boss knows redhat and gentoo and would like
to know more about debian.
Another question, is there a way to test a site like amazon.com running
which OS?
Regards,
--
Zhengqua
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 03:44 +, Bob Cox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 18:39:14 -0700, Ross Boylan (r...@biostat.ucsf.edu)
> wrote:
>
> > I've encountered 2 different websites today that told me I need a java
> > plugin installed. But iceweasel shows
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 18:39:14 -0700, Ross Boylan (r...@biostat.ucsf.edu)
wrote:
> I've encountered 2 different websites today that told me I need a java
> plugin installed. But iceweasel shows that it has such a plugin.
>
> Can anyone suggest how I can diagnose or fix thi
I've encountered 2 different websites today that told me I need a java
plugin installed. But iceweasel shows that it has such a plugin.
Can anyone suggest how I can diagnose or fix this? The system is
basically lenny (including non-free and the Marillat archives).
For example, my school
Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
> thveillon.debian wrote:
>> Chris Bannister a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:54:06AM +, thveillon.debian wrote:
If you're tired of hacking around css you can have a look at the
"Stylish" extension : https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/210
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
