On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 21:08 -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Grant wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 18:54, Jacob S wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:29:47 -0800 (PST)
> >>"Ron Farrer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thank you. Something encouraging out there.
> I was starting to think I was
Grant wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 18:54, Jacob S wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:29:47 -0800 (PST)
"Ron Farrer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, December 8, 2004 4:29, Robert Vangel said:
Gregory Seidman wrote:
I use squirrelmail on top of courier-imap, but I haven't tried it
with> particularly la
Gregory Seidman wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:49:20AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
} I'm getting kind of sick of squirrelmail.
}
} It have a very lame feature that mailboxes in excess of 1500 to 2000
} emails simply don't load or fail to work correctly. That and I am
} getting hit with SERVER_
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 18:54, Jacob S wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:29:47 -0800 (PST)
> "Ron Farrer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, December 8, 2004 4:29, Robert Vangel said:
> > > Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > >> I use squirrelmail on top of courier-imap, but I haven't tried it
> > >with>
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:29:47 -0800 (PST)
"Ron Farrer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, December 8, 2004 4:29, Robert Vangel said:
> > Gregory Seidman wrote:
> >> I use squirrelmail on top of courier-imap, but I haven't tried it
> >with> particularly large mailboxes. I have no trouble sending em
On Wed, December 8, 2004 4:29, Robert Vangel said:
> Gregory Seidman wrote:
>> I use squirrelmail on top of courier-imap, but I haven't tried it with
>> particularly large mailboxes. I have no trouble sending email through
>> it,
>> however.
>
> I use squirrelmail on top of courier-imap as well (so
Tom Allison wrote:
> So I'm in the market for something new.
>
> Maildir support is mandatory.
>
> I know of courier-imap.
I personally prefer BincIMAP.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 07:01 -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:49:20AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> } I'm getting kind of sick of squirrelmail.
> }
> } It have a very lame feature that mailboxes in excess of 1500 to 2000
> } emails simply don't load or fail to work correctl
Gregory Seidman wrote:
} So I'm in the market for something new.
}
} Maildir support is mandatory.
}
} I know of courier-imap. I'm a little leary of this because I'm not
} using courier as my imap server I would like to avoid something the
} would install it as a dependency. This doesn't cond
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:49:20AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
} I'm getting kind of sick of squirrelmail.
}
} It have a very lame feature that mailboxes in excess of 1500 to 2000
} emails simply don't load or fail to work correctly. That and I am
} getting hit with SERVER_RESPONSE errors every t
I'm getting kind of sick of squirrelmail.
It have a very lame feature that mailboxes in excess of 1500 to 2000
emails simply don't load or fail to work correctly. That and I am
getting hit with SERVER_RESPONSE errors every time I send anything.
So I'm in the market for something new.
Maildir su
> I would like to give web-access to my mail users. Just the basic reading
> and replying to messages in /var/spool/mail should be enough.
Try IMP from the horde project (www.horde.org). Debian package
available.
bye,
-christian-
--
Linux - the choice of the GNU generation. Join the D
I would like to give web-access to my mail users. Just the basic reading
and replying to messages in /var/spool/mail should be enough.
I have searched the Debian packages, but nothing seems to be there. Does
anyone have a good recommendation for such a application?
Ease of installation would be nic
13 matches
Mail list logo
