On Mi, 26 iun 13, 10:41:24, låzaro wrote:
> In my country, a terrorist plant bombs in hotels long time ago...
>
> While government check data communicationI I will sleep quiet thinking that
> at less, if somebody plan put another bomb, will be not via phone...
>
> Nobody shoot here, nobody put a
Thread name: "Re: counter-PRISM PRISM - Re: wacky question"
Mail number: 4
Date: Wed, Jun 26, 2013
In reply to: Chris Bannister
>
>
> [Please don't top post on this list.]
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 08:05:04PM -0400, låzaro wrote:
> > Make yourself
.
Thread name: "Re: counter-PRISM PRISM - Re: wacky question"
Mail number: 3
Date: Tue, Jun 25, 2013
In reply to: Slavko
>
> Dňa 25.06.2013 19:32 låzaro wrote / napísal(a):
> > Thread name: "Re: counter-PRISM PRISM - Re: wacky question"
> > Mail number:
[Please don't top post on this list.]
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 08:05:04PM -0400, låzaro wrote:
> Make yourself this question:
>
>
>I'm s important? The CIA is looking for me?
>
>There have not another way for waste CIA's time and money than look
>for me; a Mr. Nobody?
>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 08:08:11PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> And we tend to get caught up in the wrong battles and find ourselves
> converted to their world. And conflate the government's stupidities with
> God's intent for us to learn hard lessons.
Oh, please! Don't go there.
Please read:
http://
Dňa 25.06.2013 19:32 låzaro wrote / napísal(a):
> Thread name: "Re: counter-PRISM PRISM - Re: wacky question"
> Mail number: 2
> Date: Tue, Jun 25, 2013
> In reply to: Slavko
>>
>> Dňa 25.06.2013 02:05 låzaro wrote / napísal(a):
>>> Make yours
On 25/06/13 19:55, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 June 2013 17:04:08 Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>>> I find this comment very offensive.
>>
>> Don't worry, you are not alone with this. I guess most people ignore
>> messages from the previous poster.
>
> Nor are you the first person to find his po
On Tuesday 25 June 2013 17:04:08 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Veljko:
> >> Our governments make a lot of evil things without our permissions, but
> >> there are reasons for people seek asylum in "evil" countries like the
> >> USA, France, Great Britain, Germany etc. ;). Lees people flew from the
> >> US
Thread name: "Re: counter-PRISM PRISM - Re: wacky question"
Mail number: 2
Date: Tue, Jun 25, 2013
In reply to: Slavko
>
> Dňa 25.06.2013 02:05 låzaro wrote / napísal(a):
> > Make yourself this question:
> >
> >I'm s important? The CIA
Good time of the day, Veljko.
Thank you, for your time and answer. On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:22:36 +0200
you wrote:
> I find this comment very offensive. Governments from USA, Mexico,
> Germany or Serbia are pretty much same when it comes to political
> freedoms. It's just that some governments are
Dňa 25.06.2013 02:05 låzaro wrote / napísal(a):
> Make yourself this question:
>
>I'm s important? The CIA is looking for me?
There are more questions:
How CIA (NSA, FBI, etc) will know, that the mail is from me and because
i am not important for them, then they will not scan it?
Veljko:
>> Our governments make a lot of evil things without our permissions, but
>> there are reasons for people seek asylum in "evil" countries like the
>> USA, France, Great Britain, Germany etc. ;). Lees people flew from the
>> USA to Mexico or from Germany to Serbia ;).
>
> I find this commen
> Our governments make a lot of evil things without our permissions, but
> there are reasons for people seek asylum in "evil" countries like the
> USA, France, Great Britain, Germany etc. ;). Lees people flew from the
> USA to Mexico or from Germany to Serbia ;).
I find this comment very offensive
hould I stop seen it?
After that... you will feel better person and less paranoiac...
Thread name: "Re: counter-PRISM PRISM - Re: wacky question"
Mail number: 6
Date: Thu, Jun 20, 2013
In reply to: Chris Bannister
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:08:12PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 02:11:10 +0200, staticsafe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:41:24AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 6/25/13, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:28:18 +0100
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
whack
>>
>> This is an interesting discussion. But perhaps if we want to
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:41:24AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 6/25/13, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:28:18 +0100
> > Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >
> whack
> >>
> >> This is an interesting discussion. But perhaps if we want to
> >> continue we should take it off-list?
>
On 6/25/13, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:28:18 +0100
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
whack
>>
>> This is an interesting discussion. But perhaps if we want to
>> continue we should take it off-list?
debian-curiosa@lists... perhaps appropriate?
Some (such as I) do appreciate some d
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 11:01 -0400, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:28:18 +0100
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> >>> whack
> >
> > This is an interesting discussion. But perhaps if we want to
> > continue we should take it off-list?
>
> Please do.
I several time tried to switch _this th
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 15:28 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> And disturbing that he could see the seeds so
> long ago.
Somebody already explained that this is the nature of beings. We didn't
change that much, even philosophers 2000 years before Orwell have seen
this.
> I fear our governnments more tha
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:28:18 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>> whack
>
> This is an interesting discussion. But perhaps if we want to
> continue we should take it off-list?
Please do.
-- cmg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
On Monday 24 June 2013 12:57:01 André Nunes Batista wrote:
> Since I was the one who first pointed out 1984, I guess I should add
> another comment.
>
> I do not meant we actually live in Orwell's society. I used an hyperbole
> as mean to purposefully disregard the differences in fiction and point
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 08:57 -0300, André Nunes Batista wrote:
> Germany lost ww2, soviets lost cold war, fascism won them both.
Fascism in Germany lose. Germany doesn't suppress other nations anymore,
the government doesn't suppress it's own people anymore, we don't have a
GDR anymore. Socialism a
Since I was the one who first pointed out 1984, I guess I should add
another comment.
I do not meant we actually live in Orwell's society. I used an hyperbole
as mean to purposefully disregard the differences in fiction and point
out how far his "distopia" went on to describe something very preval
On Monday 24 June 2013 12:45:25 Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 06/24/2013 02:41 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > So it is remarkable that he was able to predict so accurately what would
> > be done with computers and CCTV (which had not of course been invented).
>
> I think some of that has less to do with actua
On 06/24/2013 02:41 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> So it is remarkable that he was able to predict so accurately what would be
> done with computers and CCTV (which had not of course been invented).
I think some of that has less to do with actual prediction than it has
to do with many individuals misi
On Monday 24 June 2013 12:08:11 Joel Rees wrote:
> > He was not a scientist,
>
> You don't have to be a scientist to predict the future.
No, but he was not in fact "in the know" about recent scientific developments,
nor the way that science was moving. A scientist at the cutting edge might
have
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 24 June 2013 01:26:01 Joel Rees wrote:
> > !984 and Animal Farm were allegories of the world the authors
>
> author, singular. There was only one George Orwell.
>
My goodness. You're right.
I suppose it would have helped my memory
On Monday 24 June 2013 01:26:01 Joel Rees wrote:
> !984 and Animal Farm were allegories of the world the authors
author, singular. There was only one George Orwell.
> lived in, not
> predictions of some dystopian future.
He was not a scientist, and most of the "science" in 1984 did not exist i
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:55:44 +0200, Slavko wrote:
Dňa 24. 6. 2013 2:26 Joel Rees wrote / napísal(a):
!984 and Animal Farm were allegories of the world the authors lived in,
not predictions of some dystopian future.
These two things (author's world and prediction of the future) are not
mutua
Dňa 24. 6. 2013 2:26 Joel Rees wrote / napísal(a):
> !984 and Animal Farm were allegories of the world the authors lived in, not
> predictions of some dystopian future.
These two things (author's world and prediction of the future) are not
mutual exclusive ;-)
--
Slavko
http://slavino.sk
--
I read through this, and I am wondering why you posted this very carefully
crafted troll.
If you haven't been aware that the NSA has been going rogue from the
beginning of its existence, you haven't been aware of the NSA. Likewise the
CIA, FBI, etc., and their equivalents in pretty much every coun
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 22:13 +0800, lina wrote:
> On Saturday 22,June,2013 10:59 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Saturday 22 June 2013 05:39:27 lina wrote:
> >> What is dangerous is that people take "hooligan" as "holy fighter", and
> >> "gentleman" as "dictator".
> >
> > Really?? Where?? When?? Can
PS: If we were yesterday at the doctor and it was said that we are fit,
we anyway can fall dead when we sit up the next minute. There's nothing
that is able to cover us. Living isn't secure. In some German cellars
not only the telephone lines for the house, but sometimes even for the
neighbour hous
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 08:00 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> [snip] I'm guessing that discussing that there will be going over old
> ground for many of the subscribers. [snip]
That's the point, it's not that I don't care about this issue, but it's
not a new issue, just because there were those "new
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:07:01PM -0400, Greg wrote:
> Harmless data like what religious group you descend from? Something that
> is considered innocuous today might be considered differently at a later
> time by a less tolerant government.
>
> I think most of this should be dropped or moved else
On 2013-06-20 04:44, Greg wrote:
> Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
> packages distributed by debian?
It all boils down to te
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 22:13 +0800, lina wrote:
> On Saturday 22,June,2013 10:59 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Saturday 22 June 2013 05:39:27 lina wrote:
> >> What is dangerous is that people take "hooligan" as "holy fighter", and
> >> "gentleman" as "dictator".
> >
> > Really?? Where?? When?? Can
On 6/23/2013 10:13 AM, lina wrote:
On Saturday 22,June,2013 10:59 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Saturday 22 June 2013 05:39:27 lina wrote:
What is dangerous is that people take "hooligan" as "holy fighter", and
"gentleman" as "dictator".
Really?? Where?? When?? Can you quote? This sounds bizarr
On Saturday 22,June,2013 10:59 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 22 June 2013 05:39:27 lina wrote:
>> What is dangerous is that people take "hooligan" as "holy fighter", and
>> "gentleman" as "dictator".
>
> Really?? Where?? When?? Can you quote? This sounds bizarre to me.
>
> Lisi
>
>
I
Good time of the day, Sean.
Thank you, for your time and answer. On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:32:40 -0400
you wrote:
> Has U.S. started an Internet war?
Pardon to say, but have you just awoken?!
And not only the Internet one! For decades.
Сту.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists
On Saturday 22 June 2013 05:39:27 lina wrote:
> What is dangerous is that people take "hooligan" as "holy fighter", and
> "gentleman" as "dictator".
Really?? Where?? When?? Can you quote? This sounds bizarre to me.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 22:24 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 21 June 2013 22:07:01 Greg wrote:
> > > I agree with you, but they are still not dangerous for me, since I'm a
> > > German. If my own country will get even harmless data, it's different
> > > for me. I guess most us aren't from the U
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 17:23 -0400, Greg wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 20:40 +0200, Slavko wrote:
> > Dňa 20.06.2013 17:12 Greg wrote / napísal(a):
> >
> > > I'm just wondering what debian does to check and protect its users, so
> > > fuck me, right?
> >
> > Your protection is your responsibilit
N O T E : I only cc'ed my reply to Debian user, I switched the thread
to d-community-offto...@lists.alioth.debian.org . Is this ok?
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 16:52 -0400, Greg wrote:
> That might work for an actual terrorist, but I am a citizen and I do
> not think it is acceptable to have to act li
On Saturday 22,June,2013 05:10 AM, Greg wrote:
>>> China and similar countries
>>> > > are a problem, because they are dangerous for journalists etc..
>> >
>> > Old fashioned spy is out-of-date, and the journalists are doing the real
>> > spy things.
>> >
>> >
> Enjoy life on planet party-line,
Same here!
If you are trying to pursue security without thinking about "trust
issues", either you are God or you believe there is one somewhere.
Someone who has all knowledge possible.
Well, they have designed just their first try on layman's eye.
--
Luther Blisset
GNUPG/PGP KEY: 6722CF80
I c
Dňa 21.06.2013 23:23 Greg wrote / napísal(a):
> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 20:40 +0200, Slavko wrote:
>> Dňa 20.06.2013 17:12 Greg wrote / napísal(a):
>>
>>> I'm just wondering what debian does to check and protect its users, so
>>> fuck me, right?
>>
>> Your protection is your responsibility. The Deb
If you care to open any decent book on computer security, you will note
that the first paragraph or so will state clearly that 100% security is
impossible, dreamish.
Cryptography + free software + steganography are to be used all
together, to greatly increase the boundaries. But if you think you w
On Friday 21 June 2013 22:07:01 Greg wrote:
> > I agree with you, but they are still not dangerous for me, since I'm a
> > German. If my own country will get even harmless data, it's different
> > for me. I guess most us aren't from the USA, since this is an
> > international mailing list. This thr
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 20:40 +0200, Slavko wrote:
> Dňa 20.06.2013 17:12 Greg wrote / napísal(a):
>
> > I'm just wondering what debian does to check and protect its users, so
> > fuck me, right?
>
> Your protection is your responsibility. The Debian (and other OS) can
> only help you with this. O
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 00:52 +0800, lina wrote:
> On Friday 21,June,2013 12:41 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > The USA and similar countries IMO aren't dangerous for most of us, since
> > I suspect that less of us are terrorists. China and similar countries
> > are a problem, because they are dangerous
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 16:36 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 16:22 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Jo, 20 iun 13, 18:41:42, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > >
> > > The USA and similar countries IMO aren't dangerous for most of us, since
> > > I suspect that less of us are terrorists.
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 10:44 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
>
> > Or that a government that murders people...
>
> I.e., the usual kind.
Yes we all hear about how Uganda has fleets of drones stationed in
countries throughout the world killing people. There is nothing special
about America.
>
> > ...
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 18:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 10:44 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > Governments just don't give a damn about your desktop. Sorry if that
> > bruises your ego. They may be interested in your email and Websurfing
> > in the unlikely event that you are
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 16:22 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 20 iun 13, 18:41:42, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > The USA and similar countries IMO aren't dangerous for most of us, since
> > I suspect that less of us are terrorists.
>
> Sorry, but I don't accept this argument. Just because we p
On Jo, 20 iun 13, 18:41:42, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> The USA and similar countries IMO aren't dangerous for most of us, since
> I suspect that less of us are terrorists.
Sorry, but I don't accept this argument. Just because we personally may
not be targeted is still no excuse to tolerate it when
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 09:23 +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:33:41 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 15:25 -0700, Scott Linnenbringer wrote:
> > > Facebook stores every wall post, private message, photo, etc even
> > > after you remove from wall, delete or untag.
>
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:33:41 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 15:25 -0700, Scott Linnenbringer wrote:
> > Facebook stores every wall post, private message, photo, etc even
> > after you remove from wall, delete or untag.
>
> In some countries this is forbidden.
>
Meaning that
Until recently I though facebook could be used in a concise manner,
playing with the lured minds of those attracted only to convenience to
propagate some urgent social agendas around my fellow neighbors.
Today I am shit scared of the runnings of this society but also joyfully
wandering through thi
On 20/06/13 22:50, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20130620_084306, Slavko wrote:
Hi,
On 6/20/13, Greg wrote:
Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
backdoor or something that could collect private info in
On 20130620_084306, Slavko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 6/20/13, Greg wrote:
> > Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> > PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> > backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
> > packages
Scott Linnenbringer writes:
> Facebook stores every wall post, private message, photo, etc even
> after you remove from wall, delete or untag.
You choose to put stuff on Facebook. I choose not to.
> Gmail scans your email to place relevant ads.
No they don't. Google never sees any of my email.
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 15:25 -0700, Scott Linnenbringer wrote:
> Facebook stores every wall post, private message, photo, etc even
> after you remove from wall, delete or untag.
In some countries this is forbidden.
I completely have no idea for what reason people have Facebook, Twitter
and LinkIn
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:19 PM, André Nunes Batista
wrote:
> To my knowledge, you are never 100% sure once you are on Internet. But
> even before that, with today tech, every hardware could be sending some
> sort of signal, regardless of software running attop.
>
> Free software + encryption tho
Dňa 20.06.2013 21:19 André Nunes Batista wrote / napísal(a):
> To my knowledge, you are never 100% sure once you are on Internet. But
> even before that, with today tech, every hardware could be sending some
> sort of signal, regardless of software running attop.
You are right, of course.
> 1984
To my knowledge, you are never 100% sure once you are on Internet. But
even before that, with today tech, every hardware could be sending some
sort of signal, regardless of software running attop.
Free software + encryption though are solutions that at least should put
anyone willing to do it into
Dňa 20.06.2013 17:12 Greg wrote / napísal(a):
> I'm just wondering what debian does to check and protect its users, so
> fuck me, right?
Your protection is your responsibility. The Debian (and other OS) can
only help you with this. Of course, some can do it better and another
no. An some can cri
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 00:54 +0800, lina wrote:
> On Friday 21,June,2013 12:41 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > because they are dangerous for journalists etc..
>
> Furthermore, many journalists are far more dangerous than the potential
> threats they may receive.
>
> They "made-up" lots of things. Eve
On Friday 21,June,2013 12:41 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> because they are dangerous for journalists etc..
Furthermore, many journalists are far more dangerous than the potential
threats they may receive.
They "made-up" lots of things. Even the same story, they can tell in
quite dramatic different w
On Friday 21,June,2013 12:41 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The USA and similar countries IMO aren't dangerous for most of us, since
> I suspect that less of us are terrorists. China and similar countries
> are a problem, because they are dangerous for journalists etc..
Old fashioned spy is out-of-date
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 10:44 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Governments just don't give a damn about your desktop. Sorry if that
> bruises your ego. They may be interested in your email and Websurfing
> in the unlikely event that you are a "person of interest", but they
> can get that from your provi
Greg writes:
> So every line of code during every build is verified?
No, but there are enough people poking around in the source that the
odds of getting away with a trojan are too low to make it worth doing.
If it was being done at least one trojan would have been spotted by now.
> So the build
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 22:52 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:56:46PM +0800, lina wrote:
> > On Thursday 20,June,2013 10:44 AM, Greg wrote:
> > > Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> > > PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD o
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 03:32 -0400, Sean Alexandre wrote:
> There was an interesting post on this the other day on the liberationtech
> mailing list
> by Mike Perry from the Tor Project:
>
> Deterministic builds and software trust
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/2013-June/
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 22:26 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20130619_224412, Greg wrote:
> > Does anyone think that debian could participate in any
> programs like
> > PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> > backdoor or something that could collect private info in the
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 23:56 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:44:12 -0400
> Greg wrote:
>
> > Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> > PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> > backdoor or something that could collect priv
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 12:56 +0800, lina wrote:
> On Thursday 20,June,2013 10:44 AM, Greg wrote:
> > Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> > PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> > backdoor or something that could collect private info in
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:08:12PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> A counter-PRISM PRISM? Now there's a tautological idea! :)
gnupg? Although, there is still the metadata in the message envelope, to
worry about.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:44:12PM -0400, Greg wrote:
> Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
> packages distributed by debian?
Si
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:56:46PM +0800, lina wrote:
> On Thursday 20,June,2013 10:44 AM, Greg wrote:
> > Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> > PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> > backdoor or something that could collect private i
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:44:12PM -0400, Greg wrote:
> Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
> packages distributed by debian?
Th
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:43:06 +0200
Slavko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 6/20/13, Greg wrote:
> > Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> > PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> > backdoor or something that could collect private info in the bin
On 20/06/13 18:56, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:44:12 -0400
> Greg wrote:
>
>> Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
>> PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
>> backdoor or something that could collect private info in the bin
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:44:12 -0400
Greg wrote:
> Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
> packages distributed by debian?
Everythi
Hi,
> On 6/20/13, Greg wrote:
> Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
> packages distributed by debian?
Sure, here is something,
On 20130619_224412, Greg wrote:
> Does anyone think that debian could participate in any
programs like
> PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
> packages distributed by debian?
Maybe, way back, CIA an
On Thursday 20,June,2013 10:44 AM, Greg wrote:
> Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
> packages distributed by debian?
>
>
Do
On 6/20/13, Greg wrote:
> Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
> PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
> backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
> packages distributed by debian?
A counter-PRISM PRISM? Now ther
Does anyone think that debian could participate in any programs like
PRISM? Or could a lone (or group of) sympathetic DD or DM slip a
backdoor or something that could collect private info in the binary
packages distributed by debian?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.o
89 matches
Mail list logo
