пт, 15 авг. 2025 г. в 21:13, Fred :
> Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has to be
> used for all (browser) use?
After reading most of thread (not all):
If I understand you right — you need access in the browser to some
sites via vpn and direct access to
On Saturday 16 August 2025 12:57:41 pm Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 05:40:33PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> > Note that VPN providers will know what web site you are looking at.
>
> Maybe yes, maybe no.
>
> The Internet is increasingly centralised w
to deal with.
Thanks for the help.
The easiest way is simply to enable the VPN when you need to access
blocked web site and disable it otherwise.
Note that VPN providers will know what web site you are looking at.
This is the exact answer I was looking for - that it is possible to
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 05:40:33PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> Note that VPN providers will know what web site you are looking at.
Maybe yes, maybe no.
The Internet is increasingly centralised with for example so many web
sites served by Cloudflare. The host and URL that the browser reque
On 8/16/25 08:40, john doe wrote:
On 8/16/25 15:57, Fred wrote:
On 8/15/25 14:14, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Fred wrote:
On 8/15/25 09:26, Dan Ritter wrote:
Fred wrote:
Hello,
Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has
to be
used for all (browser
On 8/16/25 15:57, Fred wrote:
On 8/15/25 14:14, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Fred wrote:
On 8/15/25 09:26, Dan Ritter wrote:
Fred wrote:
Hello,
Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has
to be
used for all (browser) use?
A VPN is a network connection
On 8/15/25 14:14, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Fred wrote:
On 8/15/25 09:26, Dan Ritter wrote:
Fred wrote:
Hello,
Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has
to be
used for all (browser) use?
A VPN is a network connection that (usually) appears just
trustworthiness of a VPN provider?
I would suggest that the first step is to see if they have been
independently audited. A decentVPN provider should be open and honest
about what they're doing; it's all very well the VPN saying "we can't
see any traffic we pass"
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, at 21:02, Dan Ritter wrote:
> If you are buying a service from someone, you should be asking
> them what is possible and what they support, and making
> decisions about how trustworthy they are for your use case.
How does assess the trustworthiness of a VPN
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, Fred wrote:
On 8/15/25 09:26, Dan Ritter wrote:
Fred wrote:
Hello,
Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has to be
used for all (browser) use?
A VPN is a network connection that (usually) appears just like
another network interface.
It can be
Fred wrote:
> On 8/15/25 09:26, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Fred wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has to be
> > > used for all (browser) use?
> >
> > A VPN is a network connec
On 8/15/25 12:38 PM, Fred wrote:
On 8/15/25 09:26, Dan Ritter wrote:
Fred wrote:
Hello,
Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has
to be
used for all (browser) use?
A VPN is a network connection that (usually) appears just like
another network interface.
It can be
On 8/15/25 09:26, Dan Ritter wrote:
Fred wrote:
Hello,
Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has to be
used for all (browser) use?
A VPN is a network connection that (usually) appears just like
another network interface.
It can be configured to send all traffic
Fred wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has to be
> used for all (browser) use?
A VPN is a network connection that (usually) appears just like
another network interface.
It can be configured to send all traffic elsewhere, or
On 8/15/25 6:07 PM, Fred wrote:
Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has to be
used for all (browser) use?
We have no context, share with us why you want to know that (the use case)?
This is possible to select what traffic goes through the VPN.
--
John Doe
Hello,
Can a VPN be used on a per instance basis or once installed it has to be
used for all (browser) use?
Best regards,
Fred
ed ssh over socat (with TLS, so that the handshake
> > > didn't look suspect, in case their firewall sniffed that). Bonus: I
> > > got to see whether they did MITM, since I made my own server and
> > > client certs.
> >
> > If behind a BOFH firewall
ct, in case their firewall sniffed that). Bonus: I
> > got to see whether they did MITM, since I made my own server and
> > client certs.
>
> If behind a BOFH firewall, ssh is usually a lot easier to tunnel to
> sneak through than a VPN.
My bet was that 443 is always open becaus
> I was once sitting at a $(DAYJOB) where they blocked everything but
> 443 (and 80). I tunneled ssh over socat (with TLS, so that the handshake
> didn't look suspect, in case their firewall sniffed that).
Reminds me: I have an OpenVPN running on port 443, specifically to
minimize the chances that
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:16:19AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I was once sitting at a $(DAYJOB) where they blocked everything but
> > 443 (and 80). I tunneled ssh over socat (with TLS, so that the handshake
> > didn't look suspect, in case their firewall sniffed that).
>
> Reminds me: I have
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:28:40AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
[...]
> > My bet was that 443 is always open because otherwise mid- and hi-
> > level mgmt would be on top of the poor admins because they couldn't
> > go to their share trading casinos: I won :)
>
> Admins would also have problems to
look suspect, in case their firewall sniffed that). Bonus: I
got to see whether they did MITM, since I made my own server and
client certs.
If behind a BOFH firewall, ssh is usually a lot easier to tunnel to
sneak through than a VPN.
My bet was that 443 is always open because otherwise mid- a
ITM, since I made my own server and
> client certs.
If behind a BOFH firewall, ssh is usually a lot easier to tunnel to
sneak through than a VPN.
> Bigcorps are like that. It was not that the firewall department didn't
> want to talk to me. It was that they bought a "product&qu
jeremy ardley (HE12025-03-26):
> One reason to choose VPN over ssh is that many ISPs block incoming ports
> including ssh, telnet, RDP, smtp, and smb ports.
And they do not block ports used for VPNs. How convenient.
--
Nicolas George
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 01:58:27PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
[...]
> It is not that SSH is less secure, it is that crackers attempt to brute
> force SSH servers [...]
You still use passwords?
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e 'better' approach is to have only a VPN
> > > exposed and use heavy security on that. Once the VPN link is
> > > established you can ssh through the VPN to internal systems.
> > Why do you think SSH is less secure than any other VPN ?
> >
> >
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 09:23:58AM +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
>
> On 26/3/25 06:48, Jan Claeys wrote:
> > FWIW: at that rate it takes millions of years to guess an even halfway
> > semi-secure 8-character password, let alone the really secure longer
> > one you_should_ be using.
>
> It's not the
On 26/3/25 06:48, Jan Claeys wrote:
FWIW: at that rate it takes millions of years to guess an even halfway
semi-secure 8-character password, let alone the really secure longer
one you_should_ be using.
It's not the random password guess that's a problem. It's the passwords
that have been com
On 25/3/25 23:22, Jan Claeys wrote:
On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 12:39 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
I should mention that having an internet facing ssh service is
usually a very bad idea. The 'better' approach is to have only a VPN
exposed and use heavy security on that. Once the V
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 4:46 PM wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 01:58:27PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > It is not that SSH is less secure, it is that crackers attempt to brute
> > force SSH servers [...]
>
> You still use passwords?
++.
$ cat /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/10-p
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 1:34 PM Jan Claeys wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-03-25 at 17:12 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Jan Claeys (HE12025-03-25):
> > > > I should mention that having an internet facing ssh service is
> > > > usually a very bad idea. The 'better&#
Jan Claeys (HE12025-03-25):
> Jeremy insinuated that, not me, by saying that having SSH listening
> publicly is a bad idea, and that “a VPN” listening publicly is somehow
> safer.
First of all, I want to say that I hope this will not turn into one of
those discussion where you try
On 26/3/25 04:46, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
It is not that SSH is less secure, it is that crackers attempt to brute
force SSH servers [...]
You still use passwords?
Out of the box debian has passwords enabled and certificates allowed but
not mandatory.
I can guarantee at least 90% of all de
ewall
between it and my internal network. With the firewall I can detect if my
openvpn host is compromised and can limit any exploitation.
A second general principal is to minimise the attack surface. That is if
you have two potentially vulnerable services (here ssh and VPN) then
exposing onl
available on its
usual port is annoying with the logging noise, but unless you are very
constrained in terms of CPU or bandwidth it is not a danger.
Also, all this hinges on the ability to run the port knocking or VPN on
any legitimate client. That is a rather strong condition. If it does not
hold
On Tue, 2025-03-25 at 17:12 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jan Claeys (HE12025-03-25):
> > > I should mention that having an internet facing ssh service is
> > > usually a very bad idea. The 'better' approach is to have only a
> > > VPN exposed and use heav
Jan Claeys (HE12025-03-25):
> > I should mention that having an internet facing ssh service is
> > usually a very bad idea. The 'better' approach is to have only a VPN
> > exposed and use heavy security on that. Once the VPN link is
> > established you can ssh t
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 04:22:10PM +0100, Jan Claeys wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 12:39 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
> > I should mention that having an internet facing ssh service is
> > usually a very bad idea. The 'better' approach is to have only a VPN
> > ex
On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 12:39 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
> I should mention that having an internet facing ssh service is
> usually a very bad idea. The 'better' approach is to have only a VPN
> exposed and use heavy security on that. Once the VPN link is
> established you c
On 3/24/25 05:39, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 24/3/25 12:29, jeremy ardley wrote:
You could use MFA on the SSH connection and then use certificates to
establish the VPN connection?
My SSH MFA setup has clients must connect using a certificate, then
they must enter a pasword, and then they must
On 24/3/25 12:29, jeremy ardley wrote:
You could use MFA on the SSH connection and then use certificates to
establish the VPN connection?
My SSH MFA setup has clients must connect using a certificate, then
they must enter a pasword, and then they must complete a google
authenticator
On 24/3/25 08:30, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
My question is, does strongSwan or OpenVPN allow on-demand VPN over
SSH with credential prompts? That is, I want to SSH into the router,
then manually enter username, password and mfa code when I start the
VPN. I believe I can use charon-cmd for the
Hi Everyone,
My $dayjob issues Windows laptops for remote work. The laptops are
installed with Cisco AnyConnect. I am fairly certain AnyConnect is
using a SSTP configuration (but I have not conformed with Wireshark).
When I connect to the VPN using AnyConnect, I have to enter a
{username,password
Am 09.12.24 um 20:30 schrieb Paul Scott:
> I have never been completely clear about the format for sources.list.
>
> Can someone tell what to add to sources.list to get mozillavpn (sid)
Mozilla VPN is based on Mullvad VPN. Mullvad is cheaper and provides
Debian packages.
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:26:52PM +0100, Jean-François Bachelet wrote:
> Le 10/12/2024 à 19:41, Andy Smith a écrit :
> > According to:
> >
> >
> > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-install-mozilla-vpn-linux-computer
> >
> > they only
packaged by or provided by Debian.
According to:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-install-mozilla-vpn-linux-computer
they only support Ubuntu.
no.
read at the bottom of that page 'for other distributions' ;) you can
gert the sources from github and install/make it for debian t
things,
Save 50% on Mozilla VPN*
*with an annual subscription
It looks like this is a non-free, commercial product, requiring a
recurring monetary payment. Perhaps those ancient ia64 and risc ports
came from a time when it was being offered as open source...?
think you would be better off asking Mozilla how to install software
> > they make, as this is not packaged by or provided by Debian.
> >
> > According to:
> >
> >
> > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-install-mozilla-vpn-linux-computer
>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 01:08:09PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/mozillavpn shows the packages listed
> as backports
Sid doesn't have backports. What I see at that page is that there are
*unofficial* builds of mozillavpn, but only on riscv64 and ia64. What
architectur
On Tue 10 Dec 2024 at 13:08:09 (-0700), Paul Scott wrote:
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/mozillavpn shows the packages listed
> as backports
I saw those, but they appear to be for rather unusual architectures,
and I thought you'd have mentioned that.
Cheers,
David.
(sid)
I think you would be better off asking Mozilla how to install software
they make, as this is not packaged by or provided by Debian.
According to:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-install-mozilla-vpn-linux-computer
they only support Ubuntu.
Thanks,
Andy
tps://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-install-mozilla-vpn-linux-computer
they only support Ubuntu.
Thanks,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
I have never been completely clear about the format for sources.list.
Can someone tell what to add to sources.list to get mozillavpn (sid)
TIA,
Paul
On 27/6/24 11:52, Christian Gelinek wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering what options I have to connect as a client to a SSL VPN by
Fortinet[0].
Their official client "for Linux" has instructions[1] for CentOS, Fedora
and Ubuntu, although I found a blog[2] documenting the use of the
Hi all,
I'm wondering what options I have to connect as a client to a SSL VPN by
Fortinet[0].
Their official client "for Linux" has instructions[1] for CentOS, Fedora
and Ubuntu, although I found a blog[2] documenting the use of the Ubuntu
package on Debian 12.
Then I
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 04:40:24PM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
> Like Alex, one of my physical machines is a laptop that is not always
> on the home network. Though I'm usually connected to *something*.
> I'm still debating whether to bother with a VPN or trying somethi
(sbuild),1000(lpadmin)
Activating a VPN configuration is working nicely. But when switching back to the
default network configuration it does not seem to not be ideal.
Also the network is working but seems to me somehow degraded.
Here are the traces observed using journalctl:
-- Switching VPN on
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022, Erwan David wrote:
Hi,
I use a vpn with network manager which routes everything through it.
I'd like to add some exceptions for local or not so local ressources that
cannot be reached through the VPN.
The ideal situation would be to be able to give as gateway for
Hi,
I use a vpn with network manager which routes everything through it.
I'd like to add some exceptions for local or not so local ressources
that cannot be reached through the VPN.
The ideal situation would be to be able to give as gateway for those
routes "the default gateway befo
Hmm, there seems to be a difference between networkmanager in KDE and in Gnome:
Situation is, there are two users, A and B.
B defined this VPN connection and wants to start it.
If only B is logged in (directly, not remotely), she can start the VPN in both
KDE and Gnome.
If B is logged in
nmcli con up doesn't work either: nothing happens except the three
dots where the VPN icon is shown and after 90 seconds a timeout message
appears in the terminal window; so exactly the same behaviour :-(
Bernd
On Monday, August 8, 2022 3:03:17 PM CEST Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi BM
>
Hi BM
if your VPN is IPsec, then you might want to examine charon's output via
journalctl. Probably openvpn, wireguard and others can be found there, too.
Another thing to try is to establish the VPN connection using nmcli in a
terminal window, e.g.
nmcli con up "VPN name&q
Hi
I'm encountering a somehow strange problem:
A user logs into another computer via xrdp, starting either KDE Plasma or
GNOME3. Then she wants to connect to a vpn (openvpn) by clicking on Tray Icon
-> Networks -> -> Connect (in case of KDE) or -> VPN Off
-> Connect (in
D&P Dimov writes:
> And since you mentioned that you wouldn't sign up for it, do you have another
> VPN
> provider/service that you would recommend that works in Debian Buster
> (stable) with just free
> software?
I've used AirVPN before (https://airvpn.or
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 5:43:25 AM EST, Anssi Saari
wrote:
Brian writes:
> On Fri 26 Feb 2021 at 18:04:28 +, D&P Dimov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will
>> work on Debian as well, conside
Brian writes:
> On Fri 26 Feb 2021 at 18:04:28 +, D&P Dimov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will
>> work on Debian as well, considering that Ubintu is build on Debian.
>> Has anyone tried? (The Mozilla su
On 26/02/2021 21:27, Dan Ritter wrote:
> D&P Dimov wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, February 26, 2021, 3:16:03 PM EST, Dan Ritter
>> wrote:
>> D&P Dimov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will
D&P Dimov wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 26, 2021, 3:16:03 PM EST, Dan Ritter
> wrote:
> D&P Dimov wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will work on
> > Debian as well, considering that Ubintu is
D&P Dimov wrote:
> Hello,
> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will work on
> Debian as well, considering that Ubintu is build on Debian. Has anyone tried?
> (The Mozilla support was not helpful in answering my question).
What protocol is the Mozilla
On Fri 26 Feb 2021 at 18:04:28 +, D&P Dimov wrote:
> Hello,
> Mozilla VPN is supposed to work on Ubuntu, but I wonder if it will
> work on Debian as well, considering that Ubintu is build on Debian.
> Has anyone tried? (The Mozilla support was not helpful in answering my
>
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:47:13 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 09 dec 20, 11:53:20, Celejar wrote:
> >
> > As to ProtonMail, as we've discussed in the past, I'm sort of tempted,
> > but I'm not willing to give up standards based email, nor am I that
> > interested in running their proprietary
On Mi, 09 dec 20, 11:53:20, Celejar wrote:
>
> As to ProtonMail, as we've discussed in the past, I'm sort of tempted,
> but I'm not willing to give up standards based email, nor am I that
> interested in running their proprietary (albeit apparently GPL?) bridge
> application.
Yes, lack of IMAP/SM
On Mi, 09 dec 20, 19:06:27, Joe wrote:
>
> It's not more secure, (apart from using wifi only occasionally) but the
> kind of people looking at other peoples' network activities are more
> likely to target public wifi than to sit outside my house. It will
> require significantly more resources and
y other hot-spot users or
> > > local staff).
> > >
> > > Other that that, as far as I'm aware, the biggest threat are the
> > > servers I access with my client software (typically web sites
> > > accessed with a browser), in which case it doesn&#x
So any unencrypted protocol you use can be
> > overheard.
>
> It doesn't matter much whether the public WiFi is using encryption or
> not.
>
> Any unencrypted communication over the internet is vulnerable. Period.
>
> Even if some segments[1] are somewhat pro
, 8 Dec 2020 11:44:36 +0200
> > > > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > >Unless you have access to a system on the internet to set up your
> > > > > own
> > > > >VPN server y
ter much whether the public WiFi is using encryption or
not.
Any unencrypted communication over the internet is vulnerable. Period.
Even if some segments[1] are somewhat protected, the segment between the
router/firewall/VPN exit point and the server on the internet is still
completely vulnerab
with my client software (typically web sites
> > accessed with a browser), in which case it doesn't make any
> > difference whether I access them via some VPN and/or (home) firewall.
> >
> > (Assuming one doesn't run NFS, Samba, etc. *listening* software on
>
> I suppose it may depend on where you are. In the UK, public wifi
> normally uses no encryption, because there are no local staff who can
> help with problems. So any unencrypted protocol you use can be
> overheard.
Around here we have a mix:
- for small businesses (like coffeehouses or family-o
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:46:07AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:00:44PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > If something is free, you aren't the customer, you are the product.
>
> All generalizations suck.
>
chuckle,
that was a good one.
:)
-H
--
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:49:44 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 09 dec 20, 10:21:46, Joe wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 11:49:45 +0200
> > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > > On Ma, 08 dec 20, 12:27:40, Joe wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This
On Mi, 09 dec 20, 10:21:46, Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 11:49:45 +0200
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > On Ma, 08 dec 20, 12:27:40, Joe wrote:
> > >
> > > This application is also useful with a home VPN server, if you're
> > > not trying
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 11:49:45 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 08 dec 20, 12:27:40, Joe wrote:
> >
> > This application is also useful with a home VPN server, if you're
> > not trying to hide anything, but just want to use the Net
> > reasonably safely from
; > ...
> > >
> > > >Unless you have access to a system on the internet to set up your
> > > > own
> > > >VPN server you have to rely on (paid) VPN providers.
> > >
> > > There are free ones as well, e.g.:
> > >
On Ma, 08 dec 20, 12:27:40, Joe wrote:
>
> This application is also useful with a home VPN server, if you're not
> trying to hide anything, but just want to use the Net reasonably safely
> from an unsafe location e.g. Internet cafe. You can tailor a set of
> firewall rules to
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:00:44PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
[...]
> If something is free, you aren't the customer, you are the product.
All generalizations suck.
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:00:44 -0500
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 02:48:26PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:44:36 +0200
> > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > >Unless you have access to a system on the
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 02:48:26PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:44:36 +0200
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >Unless you have access to a system on the internet to set up your own
> >VPN server you have to rely on (paid) VPN providers.
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:44:36 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
...
>Unless you have access to a system on the internet to set up your own
> VPN server you have to rely on (paid) VPN providers.
There are free ones as well, e.g.:
https://www.techradar.com/vpn/best-free-vpn
I don'
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:43:31 +0100
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:12:09AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> > On 12/8/2020 1:50 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
> > >On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 23:27:25 +0200
> > >ellanios82 wrote:
> > >
> > >> - any suggestion
;
>Unless you have access to a system on the internet to set up your
> own VPN server you have to rely on (paid) VPN providers.
>
>Tor is also an option for this use case.
>
> Which of the above would apply for you?
>
> > - and , is this a reasonable idea ?
&g
On Ma, 08 dec 20, 11:44:36, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 07 dec 20, 23:27:25, ellanios82 wrote:
> > Hi List :)
> >
> >
> > - any suggestions please , for a handy VPN for everyday use : no specific
> > purpose, but only to add a little more privacy ??
&
On Lu, 07 dec 20, 23:27:25, ellanios82 wrote:
> Hi List :)
>
>
> - any suggestions please , for a handy VPN for everyday use : no specific
> purpose, but only to add a little more privacy ??
This is quite vage. VPNs are generally used for two purposes:
1. Connect a remote
On 12/8/20 9:43 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:12:09AM +0100, john doe wrote:
On 12/8/2020 1:50 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 23:27:25 +0200
ellanios82 wrote:
- any suggestions please , for a handy VPN for everyday use : no
specific purpose, but
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:12:09AM +0100, john doe wrote:
> On 12/8/2020 1:50 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
> >On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 23:27:25 +0200
> >ellanios82 wrote:
> >
> >> - any suggestions please , for a handy VPN for everyday use : no
> >>specific purpose
On 12/8/2020 1:50 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 23:27:25 +0200
ellanios82 wrote:
- any suggestions please , for a handy VPN for everyday use : no
specific purpose, but only to add a little more privacy ??
With no requirements, it is difficult to say.
Will a VPN be
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 23:27:25 +0200
ellanios82 wrote:
> - any suggestions please , for a handy VPN for everyday use : no
> specific purpose, but only to add a little more privacy ??
With no requirements, it is difficult to say.
Will a VPN be overkill? Would you be better off with open
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:35:09PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:27:25PM +0200, ellanios82 wrote:
> > Hi List :)
> >
> >
> > - any suggestions please , for a handy VPN for everyday use : no specific
> > purpose, but
On 12/7/20 11:35 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:27:25PM +0200, ellanios82 wrote:
Hi List :)
- any suggestions please , for a handy VPN for everyday use : no specific
purpose, but only to add a little more privacy ??
- and , is this a reasonable idea ?
It
On 12/7/20 11:27 PM, ellanios82 wrote:
> Hi List :)
>
>
> - any suggestions please , for a handy VPN for everyday use : no
> specific purpose, but only to add a little more privacy ??
>
> - and , is this a reasonable idea ?
>
>
Hey ellanios82,
many people and
1 - 100 of 785 matches
Mail list logo
