On Thu, 19 Dec 1996, Carl Greco wrote:
> I have set up a couple of Linux based e-mail servers with uucp. The
> main advantages of uucp are low cost and local control of e-mail
> accounts.
Exactly the reason why I like it.
> The latest system (a 386SX-16MHz 4MB PC) uses Debian 1.1
> with smail
ungwerth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
From: Nick Busigin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 1996 4:44 PM
To: 'debian-user'
Cc: Al Youngwerth
Subject: RE: virtual mail domains... long-winded response
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Al Youngwerth wrote:
> I'd
According to Nick Busigin:
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Al Youngwerth wrote:
>
> > I'd sure like to hear from other ISPs and linux masquerading/diald
> > users out there and how they handle virtual domains. Using linux with
> > masquerading and diald is becoming a very popular way to connect small
>
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Al Youngwerth wrote:
> I'd sure like to hear from other ISPs and linux masquerading/diald
> users out there and how they handle virtual domains. Using linux with
> masquerading and diald is becoming a very popular way to connect small
> LANs to businesses so I think its somet
[ snip ]
>> We do virtual domains with POP3 here by using a custom local mailer
>> and a modified version of qpopper.
>>
>> The first step is to create a virtual_pop transport, then a virtual_pop
>> director, e.g.
>This seems crazy to me. Originally, this was that approach I was going to
>take
5 matches
Mail list logo
