Re: problem with version numbering in packages openssl and libssl1.0.0?

2016-08-12 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2016-08-12, Daniel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:24:31AM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote: >> On 2016-08-12, Daniel wrote: >> > Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages >> > "openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get th

Re: problem with version numbering in packages openssl and libssl1.0.0?

2016-08-12 Thread David Wright
On Fri 12 Aug 2016 at 11:04:31 (+0200), Daniel wrote: > Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages > "openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get the version from > jessie/main and that the version from jessie/updates/main is > ignored because of

Re: problem with version numbering in packages openssl and libssl1.0.0?

2016-08-12 Thread Daniel
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:24:31AM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2016-08-12, Daniel wrote: > > Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages > > "openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get the version from > > jessie/main an

Re: problem with version numbering in packages openssl and libssl1.0.0?

2016-08-12 Thread Liam O'Toole
On 2016-08-12, Daniel wrote: > Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages > "openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get the version from > jessie/main and that the version from jessie/updates/main is > ignored because of the extra letter in the

problem with version numbering in packages openssl and libssl1.0.0?

2016-08-12 Thread Daniel
Is there a problem with the version numbering for the packages "openssl" and "libssl1.0.0"? It seems I get the version from jessie/main and that the version from jessie/updates/main is ignored because of the extra letter in the version number. Isn't 1.0.1k-3+deb8u5 the pre

Re: distribution version numbering

2001-10-18 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Aurelio Turco wrote: > As for the meaning of an increment in any of the other two components > I have not been able to find any documentation. That's because there is not one. > Could some kind soul outline what the meaning of an increment in the > other two components is, or

distribution version numbering

2001-10-18 Thread Aurelio Turco
According to http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/footnotes.html, an increment in the last component of the version number (eg: 3 in 2.2r3) means "only security fixes and other major bug fixes". As for the meaning of an increment in any of the other two components I have not been able to find

Re: Incorporation and Version Numbering

1997-08-28 Thread Bruce Perens
I'm not posting any more messages about this on debian-user. Take it up on debian-devel or in private mail if you wish. Bruce -- Can you get your operating system fixed when you need it? Linux - the supportable operating system. http://www.debian.org/support.html Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAI

Incorporation and Version Numbering

1997-08-27 Thread shawn . fumo
Hello everyone. I don't want to start up this big thread again in a list it doesn't belong in, but I thought I should write something First, to Dave on the incorporation, I might not agree it is as bad a thing as you think, but I can see where you are coming from. The thing is, though, is that

version numbering

1997-08-22 Thread Bruce Perens
Paul Wade: > Hey, users who are listening - Debian 1.3.3 is out but > it's still called 1.3.1 so nobody who buys those CD sets will feel > inferior? Why am I taking so much guff from you when I work for free as a volunteer and you take my work and make money off of it? Or are you only annoying me