On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:01:44PM -0800, Petra Kabayo wrote:
> Thanks a lot Roberto.
>
> Now, does "4" in 4Sarge5 correspond to the Debian stable release number?
> When you download the Debian installers, you see the versions:
>
> 3.1_r0
> 3.1_r1
> .
> .
> 3.1_r5
>
> So
Thanks a lot Roberto.
Now, does "4" in 4Sarge5 correspond to the Debian stable release number? When
you download the Debian installers, you see the versions:
3.1_r0
3.1_r1
.
.
3.1_r5
So this means Debian 3.1_r5 already includes mysql-server-4.1/4.1.11a-5? And
then any ne
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 17:14 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:22:45PM -0800, Petra Kabayo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to discern the versioning info being used. Take this
> mysql bug report:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369735
> >
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:22:45PM -0800, Petra Kabayo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to discern the versioning info being used. Take this mysql bug
> report:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369735
>
> Says fixed in version mysql-server-4.1/4.1.11a-4sarge4. I figure
Hi,
I'm trying to discern the versioning info being used. Take this mysql bug
report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369735
Says fixed in version mysql-server-4.1/4.1.11a-4sarge4. I figure
"4.1/4.1.11a" is the mysql version number, and "4sarge4" is specific to Debi
Do NOT change the /lib/modules/(kernel-version) because that is begging for
trouble. You need to maintain the naming conventions and should only break them
if you really know what you're doing. (And most people who do know what they're
doing don't have reason to break it.) The module update t
6 matches
Mail list logo
