On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 08:15:01PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> After a couple of years I was so blown away by how much [git] had
> made my experience as a software engineer better
Ack.
After CVS, I first learned bk and then TLA around 2003. bk left me
pining, and when they shut down acces
article and nothing equivalent comes to
mind.
However, I will point out that since the tools was initially based on
RCS, it is unlikely to be feature competitive with modern (read:
distributed) version control systems.
I actually started learning about version control with CVS in college,
then w
On 07/14/18 02:37, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I've completely replaced CVS with git these days - for all my
> hacking of course, as well as parts of home/ - and I finally figured
> out how to have a inter-system (or -drive) "git update" work
> "properly" by which I mean: ...
> This took me a few att
On Sat, Jan 09, 1999 at 03:59:07PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 09:22:26AM -0800, Mike Touloumtzis wrote:
> >
> > I use Perforce at work and have been happy both with its quality and
> > with the responsiveness of Perforce support. Their software has run on
> > Linux fo
On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 09:22:26AM -0800, Mike Touloumtzis wrote:
> I use Perforce at work and have been happy both with its quality and
> with the responsiveness of Perforce support. Their software has run on
> Linux for quite a while now, which is a nice positive.
The Windows client looks a bit
> I think "doesn't restore timestamps correctly" is a little bit too strong,
> but
> I agree that timestamps are painful.
As an example, we had some very unhappy customers after shipping a version
of comctl32.dll with an incorrect timestamp due to CVS' (non-existant) timestamp
handling. I've us
Hi,
> > Summary: can anyone recommend a good multi-user version control system
> > with Windows and Unix support, that runs in an acceptable time on a WAN,
> > which supports binary files?
> >
> > cvs almost fits the bill, but I need to store Delphi source files in it,
>
> I use CVS at work to m
> Summary: can anyone recommend a good multi-user version control system
> with Windows and Unix support, that runs in an acceptable time on a WAN,
> which supports binary files?
>
> cvs almost fits the bill, but I need to store Delphi source files in it,
> half of which are binary. I would also l
On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 10:38:01PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> Summary: can anyone recommend a good multi-user version control system
> with Windows and Unix support, that runs in an acceptable time on a WAN,
> which supports binary files?
>
> cvs almost fits the bill, but I need to store De
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 22:38:01 +1100
Resent-from: debian-user@lists.DEBIAN.org
From: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Precedence: list
X-Envelope-Sender: [EM
>> "HM" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
HM> centralised NT servers. If CVS can do binary files, that's an
HM> option.
It can. You just have to mark them as binary (preferable during
import). See Chapter 9 of the CVS manual.
Ciao,
Martin
Summary: can anyone recommend a good multi-user version control system
with Windows and Unix support, that runs in an acceptable time on a WAN,
which supports binary files?
cvs almost fits the bill, but I need to store Delphi source files in it,
half of which are binary. I would also like a Windo
12 matches
Mail list logo
