Hi all
Yesterday someone sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (my domain), and now Im
seeing this
2006-02-08 07:32:34 1F6SuX-0002gj-Ph == [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=userforward defer
(-1): failed
to stat /var/spool/uucp/. (No such file or directory)
Did a check on my /etc/passwd file
mail:~# cat
hat I connect
to via uucp (and who then relays via SMTP).
o The standard Debian config utility assumes an SMTP smarthost.
Given that I want to make some pretty non-standard changes, it appears
that the new multiple-file configuration is more appropriate as changes
can be localized to small files, bu
Hi! All Debian Users
How to configure Exim "Maildir" to support UUCP connection. I'm now
runing Exim as Maildir and need to download mail from my ISP uucp
account.
Thank YOU "Aligator"
Regards , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > In the beginning systems were isolated. There was no net. Then UUCP
> > brought light unto the darkness. This was called USENET and we saw
>
>
>
> I thought that "Unix-Unix cp" was for, well, copying files
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 01:07, Bob Proulx wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Can someone summarize the different ntp packages?
>
> In the beginning systems were isolated. There was no net. Then UUCP
> brought light unto the darkness. This was called USENET and we saw
??
Greetings,
I'm looking for a easy way to read a few newsgroups without
alot of overhead on the computer. I've setup news servers,
but never really read the stuff on *my* personal systems
before. So... I've installed Knews and it sucks, and
also tried gnus..., which seemed like overkill.
I'm lo
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 07:18:49PM +0400, Alexey wrote:
> > rcbmail is an existing program/script? uuxqt won't execute this, if
> > you don't allow it to do so.
>
> I tried to find file *rcbmail*, but it does not exist at all. :(
Could those be compressed smtp batches? bsmtpd ist the package for
> rcbmail is an existing program/script? uuxqt won't execute this, if
> you don't allow it to do so.
>
> You might add in /etc/uucp/sys for system dnttm:
> commands rmail rnews rcbmail
> command-path /usr/sbin /usr/bin /usr/local/sbin
>
> Or something else to fin
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 12:26:28AM +0400, Alexey wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need to connect to UUCP mail service provider. Taylor UUCP Log file:
>
> ...
> uucico dnttm - (2001-07-15 01:47:21.47 520) Login successful
> uucico dnttm - (2001-07-15 01:47:22.26 520) Handshake
Hello all,
I need to connect to UUCP mail service provider. Taylor UUCP Log file:
...
uucico dnttm - (2001-07-15 01:47:21.47 520) Login successful
uucico dnttm - (2001-07-15 01:47:22.26 520) Handshake successful (protocol 'g'
sending packet/window 256/4 receiving 64/7)
uucico dnttm
Hello!
I'm plaing with woody on my nntp server and my notebook.
I've had quite good working uucp feed betwen them (just for fun, I know
there are simpler ways). On server I've got inn 2.3.1-4
on notebook inn 1.7.2-18. After apt-get upgrade few days ago serwer stoppede
rece
I d'uno. /etc/services says 540 is UUCP over TCP/IP, (its an IANA
allocated/registered number for both tcp and ucp.)
With secretary software, who knows.
John
BTW, I -P DENY in ipchains for input and output, and 540 isn't open on
the Linux boxes that I use to MASQ the secret
1 10:25 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: [OT]: UUCP
I've used, (and still do use,) uucp for email for all my domains. The
Taylor uucp which comes standard with Debian, (which has a mailing
list, [EMAIL PROTECTED],) does work well over tcp/ip to port 540,
(but be advised, if
I've used, (and still do use,) uucp for email for all my domains. The
Taylor uucp which comes standard with Debian, (which has a mailing
list, [EMAIL PROTECTED],) does work well over tcp/ip to port 540,
(but be advised, if you use it over the Internet, it uses a telnet
like login-as in
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Block" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joris Lambrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Stephan Kulka'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian User
Mailingliste"
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 8:24 AM
Subjec
Thanks for your corrections, i'm feeling kind of melancholic every time i
talk/think/read about uucp.
Maybe i should dig up that uucp manual and start playing around :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:51
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>UUCP stands for Unix-to-Unix-CoPy
>
>I've used it nearly 8 yrs ago in a specific situation, even then it was
>considered out-dated. I figure it's mostly replaced by TCP/IP on all
>d
Joris Lambrecht wrote:
>
> UUCP stands for Unix-to-Unix-CoPy
>
> I've used it nearly 8 yrs ago in a specific situation, even then it was
> considered out-dated. I figure it's mostly replaced by TCP/IP on all
> devices. From what i remember (did not use it since th
UUCP stands for Unix-to-Unix-CoPy
I've used it nearly 8 yrs ago in a specific situation, even then it was
considered out-dated. I figure it's mostly replaced by TCP/IP on all
devices. From what i remember (did not use it since then) it's easy (what's
in a word) to set up but
I understand that UUCP is a form of a network system or protocol. Is it
still in use or it is totally replaced by TCP/IP?
Is there any good documenation about networking in general which is
uptodate??
TIA
Stephan
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 03:36:30PM -0800, Seth R Arnold wrote
> Ok lists, I desperatly need your help.
>
> I have been tasked with moving the company's email from a modem-based uucp
> to a tcp/ip based uucp. We will make the firewall our mx, and I have
> sendmail installed o
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 08:18:40PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Seth R Arnold wrote:
>
> > Ok lists, I desperatly need your help.
> >
> > I have been tasked with moving the company's email from a modem-based uucp
> > to a tcp/ip based uuc
Hello Seth
On 13 Jan 00, at 15:36, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> uucp can copy files (over tcp/ip) between speedy (an SCO 5.0.5, running
> sco's honeydanber uucp) and scorch (a linux firewall, taylor uucp, sendmail
> 8.9.3, mostly a hand-rolled machine from before I met debian).
I
Ok lists, I desperatly need your help.
I have been tasked with moving the company's email from a modem-based uucp
to a tcp/ip based uucp. We will make the firewall our mx, and I have
sendmail installed on it.
uucp can copy files (over tcp/ip) between speedy (an SCO 5.0.5, running
I need info on exim and UUCP. In slink's exim I found a little snippet about
UUCP which allowed me to receive mail. I have no idea about sending mail via
UUCP 'though. How should I do this?
BTW, which config is best as preparation for a UUCP configuration, the SMTP
or the local delivery?
Hi ppl, Could someone explain me how should I use uucp to download
multiple files at once. This command doesn't work for me:
uucp crdlx2\!/var/spool/uucppublic/\*tmp gaguk\!~
...while these four commands do their job just fine.
uucp crdlx2\!/var/spool/uucppublic/123tmp gaguk\!~
uucp crdlx2\
>I have exim and uucp working here. In the main configuration settings:
Thank you very, very much for your extremely helpful exim-config. What
can I say? (Look at my mailer!) IT WORKS !!!
I really appreciate your help!
Kind regards
Frederick
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Then switched to exim (instead of sendmail), that worked better, I
>received email, got confident again, but configuring a mailer to UUCP is
>more work than I thought.
>
>Now I'm waiting for some good pri
Hi all,
I'm getting Email and News via UUCP, email works (can read and send), I
get news, can also write, but they don't get sent :-(
When I do uupoll downtown I get "no such site" and only receive news.
I use uucp, exim, inn and pine, all from the original Debian d
Hi Carey,
you wrote on: 03 Feb 99 at 23:51 (received 03.02.99)
about : _Re: exim: I get mail but cannot send_
>>My responses are located with cryptic names in /var/spool/exim/input,
>>obviously ready to be delivered but don't seem to get transmitted to my
>>uucp pr
Eugene Sevinian writes:
> Hi all,
> I am trying to connect 2 Debian machine,
> via uucp. I am not sure that I will find answer in this mailing list,
Sorry about that, I was clouding the issue with my previous answer. OK, you
will need to setup UUCP on both machines. One of the mac
On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 03:20:54AM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote:
> 54.54 1060) Calling system spyur (port ttyS2)
> 54.54 1060) DEBUG: fcsend: Writing "ATZ\r" sleep
> 55.56 1060) DEBUG: icexpect: Looking for 3 "OK\r"
> 55.56 1060) DEBUG: icexpect: Got "\r\nATZ\r\r\nOK\r" (found it)
> 55.56 1060) DEB
Eugene Sevinian writes:
> Hi all,
> I am trying to connect 2 Debian machine,
> via uucp. I am not sure that I will find answer in this mailing list,
> however I will try to discribe the problem shortly. At the very initial
> stage of communication chat script is getting NO C
Hi all,
I am trying to connect 2 Debian machine,
via uucp. I am not sure that I will find answer in this mailing list,
however I will try to discribe the problem shortly. At the very initial
stage of communication chat script is getting NO CARRIER and exit.
At the same time I use this line by
I run Debian 2.0 versions of cnews and uucp and want to gate my mailing lists
to local newsgroups. So I fetched the mail2news.pl script and tried my luck.
First, I left the INEWS variable set to rnews and changed one of my procmail
recipes to put a "test" group into a local newsg
What is the better protocol to use with UUCP on TCp.
I use 't' but i wonder if
--
Nicolas Weinachter -- EXTERN
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing -l, -p and /usr/sbin/uucico (linked to
/usr/lib/uucp/uucico) as serverpath should role it. Didn't work. I was'n able
to get things working, yet.
If anyone could give me hint or a working inetd.conf-line, it would be great!
A few suggestions:
* uucp uses stream/tcp => nowait
*
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 09:27:58PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 10:36:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > George Bonser writes:
> > > You should probably do doing something like:
> > > uucp remote_uucp_node!/full/path/to/file /path_to_lo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I am currently fetching mail over an established uucp link. It
> works great! I would like to send file over this link as well. Afer
> reading the uucp man page it appeared simple but something is not right.
>
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 10:36:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> George Bonser writes:
> > You should probably do doing something like:
> > uucp remote_uucp_node!/full/path/to/file /path_to_local/destination
>
> No, he should be doing something like:
> uucp local_fi
George Bonser writes:
> You should probably do doing something like:
> uucp remote_uucp_node!/full/path/to/file /path_to_local/destination
No, he should be doing something like:
uucp local_file remote_uucp_node_name\!user_name\!remote_filename
'!' is special to the shell. T
I am currently fetching mail over an established uucp link. It
works great! I would like to send file over this link as well. Afer
reading the uucp man page it appeared simple but something is not right.
uucp local_file remote_uucp_node_name!user_name!remote_filename
bash: !user_name
Hi,
I have realized a uucp connection between an aix server and a linux
client. It works perfectly except the login. In fact, the server never
ask for login ???
help !!!
--
Nicolas Weinachter -- EXTERN
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Tue, Apr 21, 1998 at 02:21:27PM +0200, Nicolas Weinachter wrote:
>
> When i try to connect to my server, the server doesn't send me anything.
> So, my login chat script doesn't work.
I think more details are required. Firstly, is the server under your
control? Are you
Hello
When i try to connect to my server, the server doesn't send me anything.
So, my login chat script doesn't work.
Have u an idea ?
thanks
--
Nicolas Weinachter -- EXTERN
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Hello,
I want to create a connection between 2 unix machine (1 linux and 1 aix)
using uucp (the goal is to exchange mail) and in tcp mode.
I installed the taylor version of uucp on the 2 unix stations : the
install was successfull
I configured the 2.
My linux is named : pclin2
My aix is named
Hi,
My linux box is set to send mail via uucp to another linux
server. What are the services/inetd.conf lines I have to uncomment to
successfully send email?
Thanks,
[]s,
Mario O.de Menezes"Many are the plans in a man's heart, but
IP
The more I think about this the more I wonder exactly what you lost.
The spool files of mail that are waiting to go to the uucp user are in
/var/spool/uucp/
Smail keeps all of its configuration information in /etc/smail uucp keeps its
configuration in /etc/uucp
There are no files having to do
As far as I know, smail keeps no uucp file in /var/mail.
On 19-Feb-98 Bill Belon wrote:
> Greetings! I have a major problem. I'm the co-owner of a small ISP and
> we're using Smail. Our uccp file was accidentally deleted from the
> /var/mail directory. We have cus
Greetings! I have a major problem. I'm the co-owner of a small ISP and
we're using Smail. Our uccp file was accidentally deleted from the
/var/mail directory. We have customers who are very unhappy right now.
Can you tell me the lines that the file contains? Or possibly give me a
copy of
Hallo,
I have very interesting problem :
I'm using Debian on 586 as Mail Gateway to my computers which is connected via
UUCP. UUCP connection is established by modems in regular time intervals. When
e-mail arrives with dest. address like [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendmail stores it in
UUCP
>>>>> On Wed, 06 Aug 1997, Victor Torrico said:
Victor> I'm running a ppp dialup to an ISP who uses pop3 and dynamic
Victor> addressing. This is my only access to the net. I have no
Victor> local net.
Victor> Is it to my advantage to run uucp over tc
>It is an entire smtp session sent as text (including HELO statement) such
>as:
Eourrr. Weird. Never heard of it.
>> Hmmm, that's interesting because we've been running UUCP through sendmail
>> for over two years and never ran into problems.
>
>Not yet. Ca
> A bit of a different approach is to allow sendmail to run outbound mail
>SMTP and have the inbound mail as uucp. That is what I'm doing and it
works >OK. Kind of sloppy in some ways but if the q time is fairly short
it seams to >work well enough. This only works, of
A bit of a different approach is to allow sendmail to run outbound mail
SMTP and
have the inbound mail as uucp. That is what I'm doing and it works OK. Kind
of sloppy in
some ways but if the q time is fairly short it seams to work well enough. This
only works, of coarse,
bas
>I have one site that insists on using sendmail. This site was using me as
>a smarthost for outbound mail. I instructed him to use the uucp-dom mailer
>so I assume he was. Nevertheless, about 10% of his mail to remote sites
>was bouncing. I suspect that it was because sendmail
>and there would be no bang paths in the email. If you use sendmail at
>either end, you are going to end up with a lot of remote sites rejecting
>your mail. This is particularly true of qmail which seems to reject anything
>with a bang path in any header.
This isn't true. If
George Bonser wrote:
>
> If both ends are Taylor, use i protocol. It is full duplex and can
> recover where it left off in case of interruption.
>
> This shortens the transaction and makes error recovery fster.
>
> On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Chris Brown wrote:
>
> >
I have gotten uucp running properly over tcp. When using tcp
which mode is the most effecient? From what I understand mode t was
designed for such links but taylor suppores mode i which I haven't
seen much documentation on. Which way should I go?
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
uuxqt - - (..time..) ERROR: creat (TMP0d98): Permission denied
This just started happening lately.. The only thing I've installed is
dosemu.66.7-1, dosfstools1.0-9, mtools3.6-1, and slang.99.38_.99.38-2.6..
one of these programs must have changed some ac
until I come on line. I would like that mail to be queued
for uucp instead. Currently both the server at work and my home
system are able to connect via uucp over tcp, all I need is to get
the server at the shop to queue the mail for my home system.
When sendmail installed on the server a
Chris Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: When sendmail installed on the server at the shop I told it to
: be able to use uucp but I don't see anything in the sendmail.cf that
: would allow this. I figure that it should be simple to add a couple
: of lines to the sendmail.cf t
Eloy A. Paris wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry again for the off-topic question...
>
> following the advice several people in the list gave to me last week,
> I set up UUCP to handle e-mail between our main office and our remote
> branch offices.
>
> I can write e-mail an
Hi,
sorry again for the off-topic question...
following the advice several people in the list gave to me last week,
I set up UUCP to handle e-mail between our main office and our remote
branch offices.
I can write e-mail and it gets sent to the UUCP job queue. Later, when the
systems connect
I have several uucp over TCP/IP connections and you do not even need the
service 540 entry, it defaults to 540, use the service entry if you are
connecting to a non-standard port.
> : 3. port:
> :
> : porttcp-conn
> : typetcp
> : service 540
> :
>
On Jun 11, Chris Brown wrote
:
: When setting up Taylor uucp over tcp it looks to me that the
: only configuration files that are needed are.
:
: 1. config:
:
: hostname foo
:
: 2. sys:
:
: system foo2
: address foo2.bar.com
: timeAny
: porttcp-conn
When setting up Taylor uucp over tcp it looks to me that the
only configuration files that are needed are.
1. config:
hostname foo
2. sys:
system foo2
address foo2.bar.com
timeAny
porttcp-conn
chatogin: login_name word: pass_word
3. port
Dr A.R. [Tom] Peters wrote:
> I noticed that my uucico etc. from the uucp package (1.06.1-2) is still
a.out and using libc.so.4 . I seem to be up-to date. Is this normal? Is an
ELF pre-compiled package coming, since the latest version of ld will not
support a.out any more?
It's done
Dr A.R. [Tom] Peters wrote:
> I noticed that my uucico etc. from the uucp package (1.06.1-2) is still a.out
> and using libc.so.4 . I seem to be up-to date. Is this normal? Is an ELF
> pre-compiled package coming, since the latest version of ld will not support
> a.out any more
I noticed that my uucico etc. from the uucp package (1.06.1-2) is still a.out
and using libc.so.4 . I seem to be up-to date. Is this normal? Is an ELF
pre-compiled package coming, since the latest version of ld will not support
a.out any more?
--
#>!$!%(@^%#%*(&([EMAIL
PR
I found out that the Debian uucp package I have still uses a.out format:
$ file /usr/sbin/uucico
/usr/sbin/uucico: setuid setgid Linux/i386 demand-paged executable (QMAGIC),
stripped
$ ldd /usr/sbin/uucico
libc.so.4 (DLL Jump 4.6pl27) => /lib/libc.so.4
As far as I know, I'm up
You might want to look ath the March issue of Linux Journal (the one with Perl
on the cover).
There is a fairly lengthy article about e-mail and news via uucp.
"Time is the best teacher, unfortunately it kills all of
>Question for Richard: do you have to have a static IP address assigned to
>you to use UUCP over TCP/IP?
No, you don't - only the server does. When uucico runs on the client
machine, it makes a TCP/IP connection to port 540 of the server
machine (which would normally be a machine
On Mon, 24 Feb 1997, William Chow wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 1997, Stefan Walder wrote:
> >
> > I want to use my Linux-Box at home to get mail and news. I'm using my
> > Uni-ISP
> > and i want to have several Email-Adresses (my family). And I don't want to
&
On Tue, 25 Feb 1997, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Stefan Walder writes:
>
> >I want to use my Linux-Box at home to get mail and news. I'm using my
> >Uni-ISP and i want to have several Email-Adresses (my family). And I
> >don't want to use POP, I think uuc
Stefan Walder writes:
>I want to use my Linux-Box at home to get mail and news. I'm using my
>Uni-ISP and i want to have several Email-Adresses (my family). And I
>don't want to use POP, I think uucp is nicer! So I want to use uucp
>over TCP/IP! Now my questions:
Par
On Mon, 24 Feb 1997, Stefan Walder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use my Linux-Box at home to get mail and news. I'm using my Uni-ISP
> and i want to have several Email-Adresses (my family). And I don't want to use
> POP, I think uucp is nicer! So I want to use uucp over T
Hi,
I want to use my Linux-Box at home to get mail and news. I'm using my Uni-ISP
and i want to have several Email-Adresses (my family). And I don't want to use
POP, I think uucp is nicer! So I want to use uucp over TCP/IP!
Now my questions:
1.) Can I use the email-address [EMAIL
Adam Shand writes:
>
> Hi.
>
> A quick question I hope. We are moving our main server to debian in the
> next few days. At the same time I hope to move from UUCP hdb configs to
> taylor configs. I found the utility uuconv which got me started and I
> think that I have
Hi.
A quick question I hope. We are moving our main server to debian in the
next few days. At the same time I hope to move from UUCP hdb configs to
taylor configs. I found the utility uuconv which got me started and I
think that I have that sorted out. My question is, if I have gotten
On Sat, 16 Nov 1996, Carl Greco wrote:
> The uucp_1.06.1-2.deb that was included in the Debian 1.1-14
> distribution is not compatible with libc. The executables (uucico,
> etc) are looking for libc.so.4 while this distribution comes with
> libc.so.5. Is there an updated compiled u
The uucp_1.06.1-2.deb that was included in the Debian 1.1-14
distribution is not compatible with libc. The executables (uucico,
etc) are looking for libc.so.4 while this distribution comes with
libc.so.5. Is there an updated compiled uucp packages available
I think this is probably some kind of configuration error with the Taylor UUCP
package. WHen I run uutraf it shows all received data accurately but shows
all zeros for sent traffic, both news and mail.
It shows the number of sent files but does not add up the number of bytes. It
also shows the
Hello
I have some problem with my UUCP. The line disconnects in the beginning of
the handshake. I have tried with another MYsystemNAME and then the remote
(ISP) side complains verbose that "You are unknown to me" so I'm apparently
using the right MYsystemNAME. Funny thing is t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 03:09 AM 10/15/96 GMT, George Bonser wrote:
>I installed the Debian UUCP package and can not seem to find where it
>put the configuration files. The binaries seem to be in place but if I
>look in /usr/local or /usr I find no conf/ directory and it
Dear Debian Users,
Recently I installed de Taylor UUCP package and configured it for a friend
of mine. It turns out that this package expects 'rmail' to be in the /bin
directory, while the installed Sendmail installed its rmail in /usr/bin. A
simple symbolic link fixed things, but th
Olaf Erb writes:
> uucp-1.06.1-2 was a.out some time ago, is there now (as real 1.1 is coming)
> a ELF version available? The same about pbmplus, cnews and nntp, a2gs,
> a2ps..
and symlinks-1.0-2, gopherd-2.1.1-2, gopher-client-2.1.1-2,
auto-pgp-1.04-0
> I can't find anything
Hi,
uucp-1.06.1-2 was a.out some time ago, is there now (as real 1.1 is coming)
a ELF version available? The same about pbmplus, cnews and nntp, a2gs,
a2ps..
I can't find anything different from my versions on ftp.debian.org, so I
suppose there's nothing newer available. Shou
On Thu, 16 May 1996, Olaf Erb wrote:
> Ok, recompiling isn't a big job, but I'd like to know which other
> packages are still a.out. Is there a quick way to recognise them?
file /bin/* /usr/bin/* /sbin/* /usr/sbin/* | grep MAGIC
Will list all of the binaries which are still a.out. Then us
F compiled with all everything not essential as module.
> Also, if you have both a.out and ELF programs running simultaneously
> that can be a reasonably large memory hit - sorry about the few Debian
> packages left that are a.out .
I checked it out, all programs running at this moment
Billy Chow writes:
> Olaf> sluggish. It's not a mem problem, it's 32mb (but only a 486/66)
> Olaf> with 10mb free on average... Loading emacs freezes X11
> Olaf> completely for about 5 seconds, with a.out everything slowed
> Olaf> down during emacs-startup, too, but not like now. That's the
> Olaf>
> "Olaf" == Olaf Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Olaf> the system is more
Olaf> sluggish. It's not a mem problem, it's 32mb (but only a 486/66)
Olaf> with 10mb free on average... Loading emacs freezes X11
Olaf> completely for about 5 seconds, with a.out everything slowed
Olaf> down during ema
ything slowed down during emacs-startup, too,
but not like now. That's the price we pay for new features..
Something positive: I compiled some of my /usr/local programs. Due to more
shlibs some binaries shrinked from 150k to 80kb.
One thin about the packages:
I just discovered that tay
stead using `popclient'.
>
> Another approach worth considering is the use of uucp for email (and
> news) transfers. That's what I use at my site and it works like a
> charm. Note that as mentioned above, your upstream provider must set
> up an MX record for your machine or
94 matches
Mail list logo
