Jean-François Pirlet wrote:
This is only partly correct. The real answer is you can convert from
any lossless format to lossy to acheive the desired results. WAV is
uncompressed lossless audio data, whereas FLAC, Wavpack, etc. are
lossless compression file formats that also have the ability to
>
Jean-François Pirlet wrote:
The mp3 is to the CD what the abstract is to
the book, if you want. If you have the book, you can write the abstract,
but the other way round won't work.
[snip]
You could also go from mp3 320 to mp3 160 (gaining disk space
but losing quality). But going from 160
> This is only partly correct. The real answer is you can convert from
> any lossless format to lossy to acheive the desired results. WAV is
> uncompressed lossless audio data, whereas FLAC, Wavpack, etc. are
> lossless compression file formats that also have the ability to store
> ID3 tag info
>
2009/10/28 steef
hi folks,
some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance existing
mp3_files with 48Kbit >> 320Kbit.
>
Here's a good link that explains transcoding, which is what your question is
about: http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Transcoding
>>
Raffaele Morelli wrote:
2009/10/28 steef mailto:debian.li...@home.nl>>
hi folks,
some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance
existing mp3_files with 48Kbit >> 320Kbit.
my question: does this r e a l l y gives an improvement of sound
quality [ceter
2009/10/28 steef
> hi folks,
>
> some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance existing
> mp3_files with 48Kbit >> 320Kbit.
>
> my question: does this r e a l l y gives an improvement of sound quality
> [ceteris paribus]
>
No.
You can achieve sound improvemente only if you
hi folks,
some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance
existing mp3_files with 48Kbit >> 320Kbit.
my question: does this r e a l l y gives an improvement of sound quality
[ceteris paribus]
google came up only with some hunches.
regards,
steef,
user wit
7 matches
Mail list logo
