Re: user agents
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 07:49:18PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am I mistaken, or is smart wrap not as smart as I need? Smart wrap assumes the recipient's MUA knows what smart wrap is, IIRC, so things don't work out as expected sometimes. - --
Re: user agents
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 07:49:18PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thank you. np. > I had "Smart wrapping" turned on, and thought this would do the job. > Am I mistaken, or is smart wrap not as smart as I need? Bingo. It just shows you the lines wrapped, but does not insert line terminators.
Re: user agents
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 23:21:03 +0100 Nicolas Kratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > X-Mailer: Sylpheed > > Sylpheed automatically wraps lines... for you. If there are those > little crooked arrows at the end of each line, it will send the > paragraph as one line. You need to do one of two things: > >
user agents
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 11:24:04AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:03:04 -0800 > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Wow! Complete with line wraps turned off! Bonus windows luser > > wannabe troll points! 8:o) > > I don't have line wraps turned off. > > I t
Re: Well I don't know for sure to be honest, but I certainly don't think it is good manners to put your entire message in the subject of your message. I mean, you could do it of course, and it will probably work, too. But should you? And what will your audience think of it? After all, the subject is really just meant to be an indicator of what's in the actual message. But I couldn't find anything in your message, so I thought I should be writing you about it in this way, so you would best see the point I am trying to make. It is also a lot harder to insert correct linebreaks in the subject, so that alone should be a reason to avoid doing these stupid things. And else will be next? HTML mail in the subject? Javascipt? A $%^$ ms-word document? I really think you definately should reconsider doing these things, surely nothing good can come of it. Re: is there software that will do financial options/risk analysis? (opensource) PS: I hope this does not crash people's mail user agents..AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
will trillich wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:56:44PM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:57:42AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > i must say, that was the best laugh i've had in a looong time. > > (anybody have email brakage from this? my mutt had no >
Re: Well I don't know for sure to be honest, but I certainly don't think it is good manners to put your entire message in the subject of your message. I mean, you could do it of course, and it will probably work, too. But should you? And what will your audience think of it? After all, the subject is really just meant to be an indicator of what's in the actual message. But I couldn't find anything in your message, so I thought I should be writing you about it in this way, so you would best see the point I am trying to make. It is also a lot harder to insert correct linebreaks in the subject, so that alone should be a reason to avoid doing these stupid things. And else will be next? HTML mail in the subject? Javascipt? A $%^$ ms-word document? I really think you definately should reconsider doing these things, surely nothing good can come of it. Re: is there software that will do financial options/risk analysis? (opensource) PS: I hope this does not crash people's mail user agents..AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:56:44PM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:57:42AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > > > > > > i must say, that was the best laugh i've had in a looong time. (anybody have email brakage from this? my mutt had no troubles at all...) -- DEBIAN NEWBIE T
Well I don't know for sure to be honest, but I certainly don't think it is good manners to put your entire message in the subject of your message. I mean, you could do it of course, and it will probably work, too. But should you? And what will your audience think of it? After all, the subject is really just meant to be an indicator of what's in the actual message. But I couldn't find anything in your message, so I thought I should be writing you about it in this way, so you would best see the point I am trying to make. It is also a lot harder to insert correct linebreaks in the subject, so that alone should be a reason to avoid doing these stupid things. And else will be next? HTML mail in the subject? Javascipt? A $%^$ ms-word document? I really think you definately should reconsider doing these things, surely nothing good can come of it. Re: is there software that will do financial options/risk analysis? (opensource) PS: I hope this does not crash people's mail user agents..AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA I am sorry if it does.
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:57:42AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
