T.J. Duchene:
One programmer created asystemd fork called "uselessd".
He declared it dead about six months ago.
On 10/27/2014 10:20 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I would like to evaluate both `eudev` (or any other *udev), plus
> `uselessd`, on Debian sid/testing.
>
> Lets do it?!
>
> I' m planning to achieve, at least, "CGroups Process" with `
Le 28.10.2014 14:34, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
Andrei's reply has lots of useful stuff in it, I just had two things
to add:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:20:24AM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
If things goes well, I think that `uselessd + new udev` might be a
good path to follow, m
Andrei's reply has lots of useful stuff in it, I just had two things to add:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:20:24AM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> If things goes well, I think that `uselessd + new udev` might be a
> good path to follow, mostly because it will not required "d
Le 28.10.2014 03:20, Martinx - ジェームズ a écrit :
Hey guys,
I would like to evaluate both `eudev` (or any other *udev), plus
`uselessd`, on Debian sid/testing.
Lets do it?!
I' m planning to achieve, at least, "CGroups Process" with
`uselessd`
(no init scripts).
If thin
On Ma, 28 oct 14, 00:20:24, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>
> I would like to evaluate both `eudev` (or any other *udev), plus
> `uselessd`, on Debian sid/testing.
There's already a Request For Package (RFP) bug[1] against the wnpp[2]
pseudo-package, you might want to post your progr
Hey guys,
I would like to evaluate both `eudev` (or any other *udev), plus
`uselessd`, on Debian sid/testing.
Lets do it?!
I' m planning to achieve, at least, "CGroups Process" with `uselessd`
(no init scripts).
If things goes well, I think that `uselessd + new udev` might
7 matches
Mail list logo
