John M Flinchbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i installed it as well, but i had to revert back to the
> /dev/hda* devices instead of /dev/discs/disc*/part* devices
> which i had from devfs.
If you are using ide disks, you can put this in your udev.rules file to
get devfs disk names:
BUS="ide"
On Saturday 27 March 2004 16:06, John M Flinchbaugh wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:32:46PM +0200, Ilkka Lindroos wrote:
> > I installed 2.6.3 with udev just a couple of days ago, and
> > everything is workin just fine. I have booted with 2.4 few
> > times, and no problems there either.
>
> i i
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:32:46PM +0200, Ilkka Lindroos wrote:
> I installed 2.6.3 with udev just a couple of days ago, and
> everything is workin just fine. I have booted with 2.4 few times,
> and no problems there either.
i installed it as well, but i had to revert back to the
/dev/hda* devic
On Saturday 27 March 2004 01:31, csj wrote:
> Would installing udev have any (harmful) effect on a 2.4 system,
> or would is just be ignored? I'm "trialing" 2.6 on a regular 2.4
> system (lots of unresolved hardware issues yet on 2.6 like poor
> tv and no lirc support).
I installed 2.6.3 with ude
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would installing udev have any (harmful) effect on a 2.4 system,
> or would is just be ignored? I'm "trialing" 2.6 on a regular 2.4
> system (lots of unresolved hardware issues yet on 2.6 like poor
> tv and no lirc support).
It will probably be ignored since 2.4
On 24. March 2004 at 12:48PM -0500,
"Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> So, to summarize :
> . udev is dynamaic management of /dev along the lines of devfs
> . udev is purely userspace (no kernel module or driver)
> . therefore the naming scheme is defined p
/sys. But not all devices have been ported to the sysfs
yet, mostly stuff like the 'virtual' devices like ppp. I have my doubts
about everything being moved over during the 2.6 series. Although from
what I've read on the kernel mailing list, for the 2.8 series, you are
probably
> "John" == John L Fjellstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is sysfs going to replace procfs or something?
John> Not a replacement, an extension. Procfs was originally intended
John> to be just for the processor-related info, I think,
Process related, not processor related.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:15:07PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:07:41PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> | On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:25:27PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> | > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:12:43PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> [...]
> | > | Is this automatic
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is sysfs going to replace procfs or something?
Not a replacement, an extension. Procfs was originally intended to be
just for the processor-related info, I think, and slowly it got added
more features (like disk info, system info etc). With sysfs, anyt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:18:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> | "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | > The thing with udev is it is all userspace, therefore it works with
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:07:41PM +, Pigeon wrote:
| On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:25:27PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:12:43PM +, Pigeon wrote:
[...]
| > | Is this automatic with Debian kernel packages? With a DIY 2.6 I had to
| > | create /sys and mount
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:25:27PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:12:43PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> | On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:48:43PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> | > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:18:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> | > | "Derrick 'dman' Hud
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:12:43PM +, Pigeon wrote:
| On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:48:43PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:18:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
| > | "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | > The thing with udev is it is al
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:48:43PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:18:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> | "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | > The thing with udev is it is all userspace, therefore it works with
> | > any 2.6 kernel (that ha
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:18:59PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
| "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > The thing with udev is it is all userspace, therefore it works with
| > any 2.6 kernel (that has SYSFS in it). You can upgrade udev without
| > touching your kernel, unlike de
16 matches
Mail list logo
