> If you are working from remote machine, the problem might be restarting
> services which kills your connection.
The problem is that it did not behave this way on any of the other containers
on either of my hosts. These are all via ssh connections, the same as I have
been doing since 2002.
--b
>
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:41:47 -0500
Brad Alexander wrote:
> I have an openvz container that I am having a hard time upgrading libc6.
> Whether I use dpkg -i, apt-get, or aptitude, I get the same result.
>
> (Reading database ... 56136 files and directories currently installed.)
&g
I have an openvz container that I am having a hard time upgrading libc6.
Whether I use dpkg -i, apt-get, or aptitude, I get the same result.
(Reading database ... 56136 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../archives/libc6_2.21-7_i386.deb ...
Checking for services
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:10:43PM -0700, NFN Smith wrote:
Thus, since the upgrade we wanted wasn't essential, we decided to not
bother with it then. However, we're now to the point where we need to
get the machine upgraded to lenny, so we need to figure out a way aro
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:10:43PM -0700, NFN Smith wrote:
> As long as I don't reboot the server, backing out of the problem is
> doable -- all I have to do is revert to the previous libc6, using:
>
> aptitude -t oldstable install libc6
>
> and things are back to where they were.
That's un
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:42:54 -0700, NFN Smith wrote:
[...]
>
> Following this downgrade, libc6 (and related dependencies) are all still
> at etch versions.
>
>
This from Chapter 4 of the Lenny release notes may be of interest to you,
especially the part at the bottom since you are using Aptitude
On 2009-03-16 17:42 +0100, NFN Smith wrote:
> I have a server that is running etch, and before upgrading to lenny,
> there's a a couple of packages with a lot of local configuration work in
> them that I want to upgrade individually to lenny versions first, so
> that I don't have the problem of ha
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
OK, its the best analogy I could come up with. I don't know if fixing
this is possible, hopefully someone can help you. I hope you had good
backups (if not, do them now if you can).
Turns out that it's not necessarily a problem.
As long as I don't reboot the serve
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:32:38PM -0700, NFN Smith wrote:
> I have a server that is running etch, and before upgrading to lenny,
> there's a a couple of packages with a lot of local configuration work in
> them that I want to upgrade individually to lenny versions first, so
> that I don't have
I have a server that is running etch, and before upgrading to lenny,
there's a a couple of packages with a lot of local configuration work in
them that I want to upgrade individually to lenny versions first, so
that I don't have the problem of having to adjust for lenny-specific
changes to pack
On Monday 16 March 2009 13:06:59 Mike Bird wrote:
> With tricky upgrades I usually remove all -dev packages first
> and reinstall them after.
That seems to make things work better here, as well. I also tend to remove
-dbg packages, too.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b.
On Mon March 16 2009 09:42:54 NFN Smith wrote:
> Is there a way of getting around this one (perhaps booting from a CD and
> using the rescue shell)? Or is it going to be faster/easier to simply
> back up the machine and rebuild it?
With tricky upgrades I usually remove all -dev packages first
and
I have a server that is running etch, and before upgrading to lenny,
there's a a couple of packages with a lot of local configuration work in
them that I want to upgrade individually to lenny versions first, so
that I don't have the problem of having to adjust for lenny-specific
changes to package
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:20:09PM -0700, alexandre suzuki wrote:
> I want to upgrade my libc6,from etch to testing,the
> output of apt-get below:
libc is the heart of any unix. Since debian gives you binary packages,
they are linked against a specific version of libc6.
If you want such things f
I want to upgrade my libc6,from etch to testing,the
output of apt-get below:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
The following extra packages will be installed:
binutils libc6-dev libc6-ppc64 libncurses5
libncurses5-dev libselinux1
libslang2 linux-libc-dev locales tzdata util-
Dear list,
I'm struggling with a problem I have a hard time fixing myself.
I'm running lenny originally installed form a weekly-build netinst. Two
days ago, the automatic update thingy suggested upgrading a few
packages, among them libc6 (from 2.6-2 to 2.6.1-1)
Problem is, the installation of li
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 09:03:37PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> That libc6 requires recent 2.6.* kernels.
Fully up-to-date sarge 2.6 kernel.
>
> Even if your running kernel were such a kernel, there are other factors. I
> doubt whether you had anything like this, but read my posting about
> LD_
That libc6 requires recent 2.6.* kernels.
Even if your running kernel were such a kernel, there are other factors. I
doubt whether you had anything like this, but read my posting about
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=#.#.# in the environment. If for whatever reason, i.e.
certain software running on a 32meg me
Hi all,
The subject says it all.
I've submitted an upgrade report with all the requisite attachements but
wanted to summarize here.
System: IBM PS/ValuePoint 6492X5C 486DX4-100, 32 MB ram, 1200 MB and 840
MB drives.
Was running up-to-date Sarge but used Woody's xserver-s3 driver. Since
Etch us
Try ´apt-get remove --purge nspluginwrapper´
Install that package again after the upgrade completes.
On 4/10/07, Luis Hidalgo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I think I have a serious problem. I tried to upgrade my packages using
apt-get upgrade but instead of being successful
the following messa
[sorry for the third reply to this message]
On 10-Apr-2007 09:48.10 (BST), Rob Andrews wrote:
> > dpkg: error processing
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package nspluginwrapper
> It has also occur
Am Dienstag, 10. April 2007 02:23 schrieb Andrew J. Barr:
> Luis Hidalgo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think I have a serious problem. I tried to upgrade my packages using
> > apt-get upgrade but instead of being successful
> > the following message appeared:
> >
> > dpkg: error processing
> > /var/cach
On 10-Apr-2007 01:17.00 (BST), Luis Hidalgo wrote:
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package nspluginwrapper
It has also occurred to me that you are installing the sarge package
On 10-Apr-2007 01:17.00 (BST), Luis Hidalgo wrote:
> I think I have a serious problem. I tried to upgrade my packages using
> apt-get upgrade but instead of being successful
> the following message appeared:
>
> trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package nspluginwrapper
Uff.
Luis Hidalgo wrote:
Hi,
I think I have a serious problem. I tried to upgrade my packages using
apt-get upgrade but instead of being successful
the following message appeared:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_amd64.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
Hi,
I think I have a serious problem. I tried to upgrade my packages using
apt-get upgrade but instead of being successful
the following message appeared:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
T
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:36:48PM +0200, Mathias Winkler wrote:
> When I try to upgrade libc6 from 2.3.2.dsl-21 to 2.3.5-6
Ok, so you're trying to break a machine that's running stable, by
installing unstable's libc6 into it.
> apt-get install tells me:
>
> | The following packages will be REMO
When I try to upgrade libc6 from 2.3.2.dsl-21 to 2.3.5-6
apt-get install tells me:
| The following packages will be REMOVED:
| initrd-tools kernel-image-2.6.10win4lin
Well, this is my only installed kernel-image,
so it's probably no good idea to remove it
Even changing the package status t
Hi List,
Trying to install libc6_2.3.1-16 using apt fails with this
message:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
iamerican: libsigc++0: Conflicts: libsigc++5 but it is not installable
nfs-common:E: Sorry, broken packages
I wonder why and what can be done.
Here are
Colin Cashman wrote:
>
> Tonight I tried to install the latest version of ssh onto my system, but I
> wasn't paying close enough attention to the dependencies. Ssh 2.5.1p1
> requires libc-2.2.1-2 or higher, and potato uses libc6-2.1.3-15.
>
> I have a vague recollection of problems running apps u
David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Colin Cashman wrote:
>> I have a vague recollection of problems running apps using libc-2.1 with
>> libc-2.2, so I thought I'd ask the list since I'm sure at least one person
>> has tried it. :)
You might be thinking of the problems caus
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:59:57PM -0500, Colin Cashman wrote:
> Tonight I tried to install the latest version of ssh onto my system, but I
> wasn't paying close enough attention to the dependencies. Ssh 2.5.1p1
> requires libc-2.2.1-2 or higher, and potato uses libc6-2.1.3-15.
>
> I have a vague
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Colin Cashman wrote:
> Tonight I tried to install the latest version of ssh onto my system, but I
> wasn't paying close enough attention to the dependencies. Ssh 2.5.1p1
> requires libc-2.2.1-2 or higher, and potato uses libc6-2.1.3-15.
>
> I have a vague recollection of probl
Tonight I tried to install the latest version of ssh onto my system, but I
wasn't paying close enough attention to the dependencies. Ssh 2.5.1p1
requires libc-2.2.1-2 or higher, and potato uses libc6-2.1.3-15.
I have a vague recollection of problems running apps using libc-2.1 with
libc-2.2, so I
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Moore, Paul) wrote:
> >Aargh. In order to run dhcpcd on 2.2.14, I need the version from
> >unstable (frozen, I guess). But that depends on the unstable version
> >of libc6, which depends on the unstable version of debianutils
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Moore, Paul) wrote:
>Aargh. In order to run dhcpcd on 2.2.14, I need the version from
>unstable (frozen, I guess). But that depends on the unstable version
>of libc6, which depends on the unstable version of debianutils, which
>depends on the unstable version of libc6
>
>If I
Apologies if people have seen this before. I initially sent it via the news
gateway at our site as I was having trouble getting subscribed, but I'm not
convinced that the gateway is making it to the full mailing list (other
messages I've sent that way are not in the archives). Now that I've got
mys
On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 02:30:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is probably a difficult question to answer, but what things
> would I break if I upgraded libc6 from slink to potato ??
>
> I would like to run dia-4.0 and the only thing that is stopping
> me is the libc6 versio
Hello,
This is probably a difficult question to answer, but what things
would I break if I upgraded libc6 from slink to potato ??
I would like to run dia-4.0 and the only thing that is stopping
me is the libc6 version. Included is the output of dpkg.
I could tell if I use dselect, but I dont kn
ncountered while processing:
icqnix
My question is: Is it going to be a big problem upgrading libc6 or QT?
I seem to recall reading on this list that libc 2.1 has some problems.
thanks
--
Andrew
[PGP5.0 Key ID 0x5EE61C37]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I want to upgrade libc6 from 2.0.7t to 2.0.7u to use apt and wine.
>But when I type: " dpkg -i libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb ", it prompts
>
> libc6 conflicts with sysvinit (<< 2.75)
> sysvinit (version 2.72-3) is installed.
> dpkg: error pr
Ok, what I suggested earlier was to try installing
both at the same time, with a single invocation:
dpkg -i libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb sysvinit_2.76-2.deb
What happens when you try that?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Well, the command and output are as follows:
>
> -
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 1998 5:48 PM
To: David Coe
Subject: Re: upgrading libc6
Well, the command and output are as follows
Well, the command and output are as follows:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ftp$] dpkg -i libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb
dpkg: regarding libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb containing libc6:
libc6 conflicts with sysvinit (<< 2.75)
sysvinit (version 2.72-3) is installed.
dpkg: error processing libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb (--inst
H, please post the exact command and the
messages you get from dpkg -- someone here will
be able to figure it out if I can't.
Cheng Tang wrote:
>
> I tried this. But it still doesn't work. :(
>
> -cheng
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 10:14:51PM +, David Coe wrote:
> > have you tried doing
I tried this. But it still doesn't work. :(
-cheng
On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 10:14:51PM +, David Coe wrote:
> have you tried doing both at the same time? i.e.
>
> dpkg -i libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb sysvinit_2.76-2.deb
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I want to upgrade libc6 from 2.0.7t to 2.
have you tried doing both at the same time? i.e.
dpkg -i libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb sysvinit_2.76-2.deb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I want to upgrade libc6 from 2.0.7t to 2.0.7u to use apt and wine.
> But when I type: " dpkg -i libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb ", it prompts
>
> libc6 conflicts with sysvinit
I want to upgrade libc6 from 2.0.7t to 2.0.7u to use apt and wine.
But when I type: " dpkg -i libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb ", it prompts
libc6 conflicts with sysvinit (<< 2.75)
sysvinit (version 2.72-3) is installed.
dpkg: error processing libc6_2.0.7u-6.deb (--install):
conflicting packages -
Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Checking system integrity...dependency error
> You might want to run apt-get -f install' to correct these.
> Sorry, but the following packages are broken - this means they have unmet
> dependencies:
> apt: Depends:libc6
get apt 0.1.9 from slink and h
hi debians
i´ve got a problem after upgrading hamm-libc to 2.0.7u-4:
i installed libc6_2.0.7u-4 manually which is required by staroffice 5
but after upgrading my apt (0.1.6) couldn´t install anything further
it says:
Checking system integrity...dependency error
You might want to run apt-get -f i
50 matches
Mail list logo
