On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Ethan Benson wrote:
[ snip ]
: >c) What is the preferred method of taking my 2.1r2 through an unstable
: >upgrade? Specifically, how do I do it?
:
: edit /etc/apt/apt.sources and change all instances of `stable' with
`unstable'
:
: then run apt-get update ; apt-get di
On 7/12/99 Ron Forrester wrote:
a) Will potato (that's next, right?) be glibc2.1 based?
potato IS glibc2.1 based.
b) Is unstable what is being prepared for potato?
potato IS unstable, potato is the codename for the next stable
release of debian it will probably be called debian 2.2.
c)
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 07:38:06PM -0500, Alec Smith wrote:
> If you really want Debian and glibc2.1, the best and easiest option
> is to use unstable for now.
a) Will potato (that's next, right?) be glibc2.1 based?
b) Is unstable what is being prepared for potato?
c) What is the preferred metho
I have searched the archives for this, and have found (very
surprisingly) nothing -- perhaps I searched wrong?
I would like to upgrade my 2.1r2 system to glibc2.1, and dependent
packages. I would like to do so such that I maintain the consistency
of my package database.
In otherwords, I want to
4 matches
Mail list logo
