On 3 Jun, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>On 3 Jun, Curtis L. Daugaard wrote:
>
>> 1) Irqtune was working for me under v.1.2, but though my configured
>> hardware is the same I now get an error message. Here is the
message at
>> boot time:
>>
On 3 Jun, Curtis L. Daugaard wrote:
>
> 1) Irqtune was working for me under v.1.2, but though my configured
> hardware is the same I now get an error message. Here is the message at
> boot time:
>
> " irqtune: setting system IRQ priority to 3/14
> irqtune: insmod failed on '/usr/lib/hwtools/i
My apologies to the debian-user list for my faulty original post. I had
just installed Netscape 4.0 and forgot to disable HTML in its mail
package (which is enabled by default). Let me try again.
Can someone enlighten me on the following, which I can't seem to solve
with the available documentat
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Can someone enlighten me on two problems? I can't seem to solve
> them with the available documentation
> 1) Irqtune was working for me under v.1.2, but though my configured
> hardware is the same I now get an error message. Here is the message
>
I don't have to check the headers to see that you're using Netscape 4
because I'm using Pine and HTML email doesn't look good here. There is
something in the 'preferences' to disable it. I seem to remember that it
defaults to HTML allowed when first installed. If they are serious about
the new 'com
Can someone enlighten me on two problems? I can't seem to solve
them with the available documentation
1) Irqtune was working for me under v.1.2, but though my configured
hardware is the same I now get an error message. Here is the message
at boot time:
" irqtune: setting system IRQ priority
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> ...
> >I'm not sure there was actually an error in the above lynx install
> >session (appart from the possibly wrong error message)
> ... If the
> >lock is held by someone else, this call returns
> >-1 and sets errno t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
...
>I'm not sure there was actually an error in the above lynx install
>session (appart from the possibly wrong error message)
... If the
>lock is held by someone else, this call returns
>-1 and sets errno to EACCES or EA
> On Apr 29, Danny ter Haar wrote
> > During the upgrade i saw the following message:
> >
> > Update-menus: Dpkg is locking dpkg status area: forking to background
> > and wait for /var/lib/dpkg/lock to become unlocked.
> > Setting up lynx (2.7-2) ...
> >
> > Configuration file `/etc/lynx.cfg'
>
On Apr 29, Danny ter Haar wrote
> During the upgrade i saw the following message:
>
> Update-menus: Dpkg is locking dpkg status area: forking to background
> and wait for /var/lib/dpkg/lock to become unlocked.
> Setting up lynx (2.7-2) ...
>
> Configuration file `/etc/lynx.cfg'
[...]
> The defau
During the upgrade i saw the following message:
---
Setting up libg++27-dev (2.7.2.1-9) ...
Update-menus: Dpkg is locking dpkg status area: forking to background
and wait for /var/lib/dpkg/lock to become unlocked.
Setting up lynx (2.7-2) ...
Configuration file `/etc/lynx.cfg'
==> F
11 matches
Mail list logo
