On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:11:14AM -0500, Shashank Bhide wrote:
>
>
> How do I upgrade from Potato to woody?
>
> What do I need to change in the sources.list file?
The official part of my sources.list file looks like this:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian woody main contr
How do I upgrade from Potato to woody?
What do I need to change in the sources.list file?
My sources.list file looks something like this:
# Uncomment if you want the apt-get source function to work
#deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://non
Hello Shashank!
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 17:40, Shashank Bhide wrote:
> How do I upgrade from Potato to woody?
>
> What do I need to change in the sources.list file?
See
http://www.de.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html
for rather detailed hints on
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:32:03PM -0600, Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> will writes:
> > seeing lots of this during an "apt-get dist-upgrade" from potato
> > to woddy today:
> >
> >
> >
> > Setting up libxslt1 (1.0.16-0.1) ...
> > ldconfig: /usr/oracle/lib/libvbj30ssl.so is not a shared
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:14:37PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> seeing lots of this during an "apt-get dist-upgrade" from potato
> to woddy today:
>
>
>
> Setting up libxslt1 (1.0.16-0.1) ...
> ldconfig: /usr/oracle/lib/libvbj30ssl.so is not a shared object
> file (Type:
will writes:
> seeing lots of this during an "apt-get dist-upgrade" from potato
> to woddy today:
>
>
>
> Setting up libxslt1 (1.0.16-0.1) ...
> ldconfig: /usr/oracle/lib/libvbj30ssl.so is not a shared object
> file (Type: 768).
>
>
> Setting up libreadline4 (4.2
seeing lots of this during an "apt-get dist-upgrade" from potato
to woddy today:
Setting up libxslt1 (1.0.16-0.1) ...
ldconfig: /usr/oracle/lib/libvbj30ssl.so is not a shared object
file (Type: 768).
Setting up libreadline4 (4.2a-5) ...
ldconfig:
Felipe MartÃnez Hermo said:
> If that's enough why debian recommends upgrading using dselect?
>
> I tried to upgrade my system using dselect+apt and I had to reinstall the
> whole system to get my system running again.
not sure, I have to admit I don't think i've ever read any of
the debian docu
thanks. I'm trying it right now.
nate wrote:
tjm3 said:
Hello. I'm about to upgrade my system from potato to woody
and was wondering what is the latest recommendation for the
upgrade sequence. I know this has been posted before, but
I haven't come across one lately. Just looking to get it
r
tjm3 said:
> Hello. I'm about to upgrade my system from potato to woody
> and was wondering what is the latest recommendation for the
> upgrade sequence. I know this has been posted before, but
> I haven't come across one lately. Just looking to get it
> right the first time. I think it was to
Hello. I'm about to upgrade my system from potato to woody
and was wondering what is the latest recommendation for the
upgrade sequence. I know this has been posted before, but
I haven't come across one lately. Just looking to get it
right the first time. I think it was to upgrade apt and dpkg
"Greg C. Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Second: For obvious reasons, xserver-svga is upgraded, but
> xserver-xfree86 is not installed. This is expected and easy to
> deal with.
Mh, my upgrade was a nightmare. After using dselect, apt-get and dpkg
to excess I finally
* will trillich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020227 05:20]:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:09:55PM +1100, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> > The only packages that gave me any grief were the KDE ones, as expected.
> > The newer packages had the files rearranged between the different
> > packages, so apt-get was unabl
Matthew Dalton wrote:
>The only packages that gave me any grief were the KDE ones, as expected.
>The newer packages had the files rearranged between the different
>packages, so apt-get was unable to install packages because they were
>attempting to overwrite files from other installed packages. I t
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:09:55PM +1100, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> I also dist-upgraded my machine from Potato to Woody about two weeks
> ago. However, my machine is a desktop system with heaps of apps
> installed. My experiences were pretty awesome considering what I was up
> against!
[snip]
> Th
dman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:58:41AM -0500, Ed Lawson wrote:
> |
> | >On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
> | >
> | >|
> | >| Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
> | >| and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 03:49:50PM -0900, Greg C. Madden wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 07:58, Ed Lawson wrote:
>
> This was posted by Dwarf on the devel list. Slighty edited for brevity.
> http://www.polaris.net/~dwarf/
>
>
> snip
> 2. Before doing the upgrade, but after an 'apt-get update', fi
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 07:58, Ed Lawson wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
> >
> >|
> >| Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
> >| and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
> >| Woody. :)
> >
> Hmm
At 12:32 PM 02/26/02 -0500, dman wrote:
>| Hmmm. Isn't it better to first change the sources list, then upgrade
>| Perl, then upgrade apt, dpkg, etc, and then do a dist-upgrade? Seems I
>| have read that a blanket dist-upgrade from stable to testing is not as
>| seamless as you suggest, but it
At 11:58 AM 2/26/02, Ed Lawson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
|
| Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
| and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
| Woody. :)
Hmmm. Isn't it better to first chang
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:58:41AM -0500, Ed Lawson wrote:
|
| >On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
| >
| >|
| >| Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
| >| and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
| >| Woody.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
|
| Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
| and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
| Woody. :)
Hmmm. Isn't it better to first change the sources list, then upgrade
Pe
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 08:58:35AM -0600, David Bell wrote:
| On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 08:44, Liam Black wrote:
| > I'm currently running potato 2.2.19, and looking to upgrade to Woody. Is
| > there a simplistic way to do this with apt / dpkg? I'm a newbie, and have
| > been spending my time learnin
Absolutely. :)
Change all references to 'stable' in /etc/apt/sources.list to 'testing'
and run apt-get update && apt-get -u dist-upgrade. You're now running
Woody. :)
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 08:44, Liam Black wrote:
> I'm currently running potato 2.2.19, and looking to upgrade to Woody. Is
> there
I'm currently running potato 2.2.19, and looking to upgrade to Woody. Is
there a simplistic way to do this with apt / dpkg? I'm a newbie, and have
been spending my time learning about the desktop much moreso than tackling
the meat of the system... but that's what I'm attempting to do, now.
So if a
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 09:17:27PM +0100, Graham Ward wrote:
| I just tried to upgrade my system from potato to woody. I believe
| these are the correct steps:
|
| (1) replace "potato" with "woody" everywhere in /etc/apt/sources.list
| (2) apt-get update
| (3) apt-get dist-upgrade.
These
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 09:17:27PM +0100, Graham Ward wrote:
> I just tried to upgrade my system from potato to woody. I believe
> these are the correct steps:
>
> (1) replace "potato" with "woody" everywhere in /etc/apt/sources.list
>
> (2) apt-get update
>
> (3) apt-get dist-upgrade.
>
Hi all,
I just tried to upgrade my system from potato to woody. I believe
these are the correct steps:
(1) replace "potato" with "woody" everywhere in /etc/apt/sources.list
(2) apt-get update
(3) apt-get dist-upgrade.
When I do step (3), I see (among other things) the message
W
Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Iain Georgeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I notice I don't have potato-proposed-updates in my sources.list. What
> > can I expect to find in it?
> lynx http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/potato-proposed-updates
> There are (important) updates for
I'm upgrading from potato to woody.
I already did the following steps:
1) Downloaded Woody packages (just like libstdc++2.10, kde2...), and
installed it to run under potato.
2) Downloaded Woody Kernel-Source test5, and built bzImage, so I use
loadlin do boot it with a dos menu. In the dos menu, I
Iain Georgeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I notice I don't have potato-proposed-updates in my sources.list. What
> can I expect to find in it?
lynx http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/potato-proposed-updates
There are (important) updates for the already released version of
Potato.
Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Oh, you don't have the security and proposed updates enabled, the
> entrys (for potato) are:
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib
> deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian dists/potato-proposed-updates/
I notice I don't have
a word of caution.
if one can't even find out how to upgrade from potato to woody then one
should not be upgrading at all.
unstable is exactly what it says.
just my 2cents.
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 21
Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>can someone please tell me how to use apt-get to change my potato to a
>woody? if it makes a difference, my sources.list file is:
[...]
>deb ftp://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib
>deb-src ftp://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/ potato m
Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i'd really like to use xfree86 4.0; i might as well just upgrade the whole
> system to woody.
AFAIK, xfree86 isn't already official part of woody, but there are the
phase2 debs...
> can someone please tell me how to use apt-get to change my potato
dear all,
i'd really like to use xfree86 4.0; i might as well just upgrade the whole
system to woody.
can someone please tell me how to use apt-get to change my potato to a
woody? if it makes a difference, my sources.list file is:
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 r0 _Potato_ - Official i386 Bin
montefin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Raghavendra,
>
> Great idea. Yes, I just did it, as root, using the following commands:
>
> # cd /var/cache/apt
> # mkdir sim-logs
> # apt-get --simulate dist-upgrade | cat > sim-logs/apt-sim.txt
This is a bit more complicated than it needs to be. Simply:
Raghavendra,
Great idea. Yes, I just did it, as root, using the following commands:
# cd /var/cache/apt
# mkdir sim-logs
# apt-get --simulate dist-upgrade | cat > sim-logs/apt-sim.txt
then
# less sim-logs/apt-sim.txt
to read it.
Thanks,
montefin
Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
>
> montefin wrote:
montefin wrote:
> I avoided some problems by doing:
> apt-get --simulate dist-upgrade
>
Can U please elaborate on this ? Can U
pipe this to get some sort of a log ?
Tnx for this nifty point..real good !!
--
ragOO, VU2RGU
Keeping the Air-Waves FREE.Amateur Radio
Keeping the W W W FREE
Rick,
Er...one small departure. After upgrading from potato to woody, I found
I avoided some problems by doing:
apt-get --simulate dist-upgrade
Then identifying the packages I really wanted and doing:
apt-get upgrade
then apt-get install .
As opposed to doing:
apt-get dist-upgrade.
But then
1. Edit sources.list pointing to woody|unstable instead of potato|stable.
2. apt-get update
3. apt-get dist-upgrade
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 09:19:55PM -0500, Daniel E. Baumann wrote:
> O.K. Here is a question that I am sure has been asked before, but I could not
> find a concise enough answer. If
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Daniel E. Baumann wrote:
> O.K. Here is a question that I am sure has been asked before, but I could not
> find a concise enough answer. If I was to upgrade to woody from potato (or
> to do a general distribution ugrade in Debian from whatever to whatever) what
> are the steps
O.K. Here is a question that I am sure has been asked before, but I could not
find a concise enough answer. If I was to upgrade to woody from potato (or
to do a general distribution ugrade in Debian from whatever to whatever) what
are the steps that I would take, would it be:
1) change sources.li
43 matches
Mail list logo
