On Sb, 11 dec 21, 01:54:12, teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:57:44 +0100
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > On Vi, 10 dec 21, 23:39:30, teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > in 2 things i am pretty sure, my first mail only john doe rea
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:57:44 +0100
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 10 dec 21, 23:39:30, teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org
> wrote:
> >
> > in 2 things i am pretty sure, my first mail only john doe read
> > completely, and a dist-upgrade will not work with this
> > non-standard-debian.
>
On Vi, 10 dec 21, 23:39:30, teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
>
> in 2 things i am pretty sure, my first mail only john doe read
> completely, and a dist-upgrade will not work with this
> non-standard-debian.
Based on the limited information you provided in your mail
`apt-get dist-u
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:41:47 + (GMT)
Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2021, teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 23:09:34 +
> > "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 11:58:33PM +0100,
> >> teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teane
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021, teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 23:09:34 +
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 11:58:33PM +0100,
teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
hey,
i have not been using debian for long and not sure how to proceed
h
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:15:40 +0100
john doe wrote:
> On 12/10/2021 9:04 AM, teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 23:09:34 +
> > "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 11:58:33PM +0100,
> >> teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrot
Hi.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 09:04:25AM +0100,
teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 23:09:34 +
> "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 11:58:33PM +0100,
> > teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
> > > hey,
> > > i have not
On 12/10/2021 9:04 AM, teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 23:09:34 +
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 11:58:33PM +0100,
teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
hey,
i have not been using debian for long and not sure how to proceed
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 23:09:34 +
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 11:58:33PM +0100,
> teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
> > hey,
> > i have not been using debian for long and not sure how to proceed
> > here. is a:
> > apt-get upgrade linux-image-amd64
> > the r
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 11:58:33PM +0100,
teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
> root@saira:~# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following packages have been kept back
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 11:58:33PM +0100,
teamas...@mad-hatters-teatime.teanet.org wrote:
> hey,
> i have not been using debian for long and not sure how to proceed here.
> is a:
> apt-get upgrade linux-image-amd64
> the right way?
> ty, jens.
apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade
[You need to pull i
hey,
ich benutze debian noch nicht lange und nicht sicher wie ich hier
vorzugehen habe.
ist ein:
apt-get upgrade linux-image-amd64
der richtige weg?
i have not been using debian for long and not sure how to proceed here.
is a:
apt-get upgrade linux-image-amd64
the right way?
ty, jens.
--snip--
roo
hey,
i have not been using debian for long and not sure how to proceed here.
is a:
apt-get upgrade linux-image-amd64
the right way?
ty, jens.
--snip--
root@saira:~# apt list --upgradable -a
Listing... Done
linux-image-amd64/oldstable 4.19+105+deb10u13 amd64 [upgradable from:
4.19+105+deb10u8] linu
Yes that totally makes sense, I was actually reading the man page but I did notÂ
understand what was the big difference in my case with the OpenJDK packages. I
only saw that it had to install an additional and new package, maybe that made
it classify more for a dist-upgrade. Because else it was
Hi,
as the manpage of apt-get tells:
[...]
upgrade
upgrade is used to install the newest versions of all packages
currently installed on the system from the sources enumerated in
/etc/apt/sources.list. Packages currently installed with new
versions available are retrieved an
Hi Patrick
dist-upgrade did it. Now as a general rule is it safe to use a dist-upgrade in
a production environment? I suppose there is a good reason for having upgrade
and dist-upgrade.
Regards
ML
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:39 AM, Patrick Weiden
wrote:
Hi,
have you tried an "apt-get
Hi,
have you tried an "apt-get dist-upgrade"?
Some packages won't be upgraded by the "apt-get upgrade" operation. Please
try the first and tell us the results. Thanks!
Cheers,
Patrick
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:26 AM, ML mail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering why an "apt-get upgrade"on my Debi
Hi,
I was wondering why an "apt-get upgrade"on my Debian wheezy box does not want
to update the OpenJDK packages as you can see below:
shell$ apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
ic
18 matches
Mail list logo
