> > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy contrib non-free main
> > updates
>
> Assuming that this is all on one line, "updates" is a bogus keyword.
> You probably want something like:
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/de
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 07:37:26AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> Update-manager's little triangular icon won't go away. If I can
> copy/paste its output:
>
> But I cannot do anything except a screenshot. Why do the gui writers
> saddle us with such broken software?
Any numbe
Greetings all;
Update-manager's little triangular icon won't go away. If I can
copy/paste its output:
But I cannot do anything except a screenshot. Why do the gui writers
saddle us with such broken software?
In any event, the error msg says a subdir of wheezy seems to be missing,
but that su
On 24/12/2014, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
> ... for some days. I see on the update-manager icon on gnome-panel it has
> got 47 updates, but when I load the Update Manager window it always
> freezes... :(
>
> I've got Debian Squeeze x86 with this sources.list ->
>
I have De
sudo aptitude safe-upgrade did the trick!
Thanks for the Debian forums! :)
2014-12-24 13:12 GMT+01:00 Gábor Hársfalvi :
> ... for some days. I see on the update-manager icon on gnome-panel it has
> got 47 updates, but when I load the Update Manager window it always
> freezes... :(
>
... for some days. I see on the update-manager icon on gnome-panel it has
got 47 updates, but when I load the Update Manager window it always
freezes... :(
I've got Debian Squeeze x86 with this sources.list ->
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze non-free contrib main
deb cdrom
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:12:28 -0700, owens wrote:
Please, no html... thanks.
> Running Debian Stable with Gnome. Today I attempted to due a regular
> update using update manager. 1. System seemed to boot normally
> 2. Root authorization of the update manager normal 3. Message "A
- Original Message -
From: ow...@netptc.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: 6/12/2012 4:12:28 PM
Subject: Update Manager
Running Debian Stable with Gnome. Today I attempted to due a regular update
using update manager.
1. System seemed to boot normally
2. Root
Running Debian Stable with Gnome. Today I attempted to due a regular update
using update manager.
1. System seemed to boot normally
2. Root authorization of the update manager normal
3. Message "A fatal error has been detected in the update manager-do you want
to submit a bug report&quo
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:23:13 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote:
> "
> Can you tell why are you using apt-listbugs to get the updates? I mean,
> "apt-get upgrade" should manage that for you, right? :-) "
>
> With apt-get upgrade, I would have installed even the update with a
> grave bug, that was my lo
"
Can you tell why are you using apt-listbugs to get the updates? I mean,
"apt-get upgrade" should manage that for you, right? :-)
"
With apt-get upgrade, I would have installed even the update with a
grave bug, that was my logic. Is there a way to exclude packages with
this command?
"
Don't wo
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:27:59 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote:
> Hi Camaleon
>
> Update
>
> I have realised that there was another error reported once I was
> refusing to try checking bug reports again:
>
> E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10
(...)
Can you tell why are
Hi Camaleon
I am reading your latest reply after I sent you another message, where I
seem to have partially solved the problem. You may want to have a look
at it anyway, it has a transcript of my console too.
Thanks again!
Pier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi Camaleon
Update
I have realised that there was another error reported once I was
refusing to try checking bug reports again:
E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10
I have decided to go manual, after reading this post:
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=484
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:28:36 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote:
> Hi Camaleon
>
> Apologies for my late reply, I would expect for any reply to my original
> post to reach my mailbox, but it doesn't...
You had some replies :-?
> As I replied to Hugo, I have tried:
> "
> root@pier:/home/pier# apt-list
Hi Camaleon
Apologies for my late reply, I would expect for any reply to my original
post to reach my mailbox, but it doesn't...
As I replied to Hugo, I have tried:
"
root@pier:/home/pier# apt-listbugs list mono-apache-server
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrievin
> I only get that with apt-listbugs.
>
> Hugo
>
>
Hi Hugo
Actually I have tried apt-listbugs:
"
root@pier:/home/pier# apt-listbugs list mono-apache-server
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
"
It se
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:44:39 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote:
> Many thanks Camaleon.
>
> Very much likely it's me, I'm a newbie ;-) This is not transient as I've
> been trying daily for the past few days. Also, apt-get install works
> with some application, but doesn't with others.
> I am on a temp
Unfortunately in my case it consistently stops at the same point: not
able to retrieve bug reports...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330962610.2400.1
Unfortunately not. It only gives me a chance to try again retrieving
bug reports.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330962513.2400.9.camel@pier
Many thanks Camaleon.
Very much likely it's me, I'm a newbie ;-)
This is not transient as I've been trying daily for the past few days.
Also, apt-get install works with some application, but doesn't with
others.
I am on a temporary accommodation at the moment, with wireless only
access to internet
pierpaolo pilla wrote:
Hi
I have this bug when trying to install security updates (in update
manager), and when trying to install mon-apache-server (with
apt-get-install):
"
Error retrieving bug reports from the server with the following error
message:
W: HTTPClient::KeepAliveDisconnect
pierpaolo pilla, 4.03.2012:
> Hi
>
> I have this bug when trying to install security updates (in update
> manager), and when trying to install mon-apache-server (with
> apt-get-install):
> "
> Error retrieving bug reports from the server with the following error
&
On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 10:48:14 -0300, pierpaolo pilla wrote:
> I have this bug when trying to install security updates (in update
> manager), and when trying to install mon-apache-server (with
> apt-get-install):
> "
> Error retrieving bug reports from the server with the follo
Hi
I have this bug when trying to install security updates (in update
manager), and when trying to install mon-apache-server (with
apt-get-install):
"
Error retrieving bug reports from the server with the following error
message:
W: HTTPClient::KeepAliveDisconnected
It could be because
[top-posting fixed]
On Jo, 27 ian 11, 19:42:07, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >
> > I got a "key expired" warning for opera on one machine. Could you please
> > post the exact message (copy-paste)?
> >
> The message wording is correct.
Assuming by that you mean that my guess was correct, see Christ
The message wording is correct.
Regards
Michael Fothergill
>
> I got a "key expired" warning for opera on one machine. Could you please
> post the exact message (copy-paste)?
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
> --
> Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mail
On Jo, 27 ian 11, 15:13:44, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> I don't remember getting this kind of warning in the past. I would be
> upgrading openoffice and opera (this I think is a non free commercial
> browser and maybe that is causing the warning here... not sure and
> ttfopensymbol).
I got a "
On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:28:00 Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out.. My apt sources file looks like this:
>
> Vigor20:/etc/apt# more sources.list
>
>
> deb http://deb.opera.com/opera lenny non-free
>
> What would the command be to do the key ring installation and
> are not signed. you need to install *-keyring packages for that
> repositories.
> please port your sources.list contents..
Thanks for pointing this out.. My apt sources file looks like this:
Vigor20:/etc/apt# more sources.list
#
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.7 _Lenny_ - Official amd64
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear Folks,
>
> I just got a message from the package update manager:
>
> It says" Warning You are about to install software that can't be
> authenticated!
Dear Folks,
I just got a message from the package update manager:
It says" Warning You are about to install software that can't be
authenticated! Doing this could allow a malicious individual to damage
or take control of your system."
I would be upgrading 25 packages if I click
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:23:24 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> On 11/12/2010, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
> Thank you Patrick.
>
> On a casual browse saw Cameleon had also responded. FWIW here are the
> things requested.
Your filtering method is too agressive.
> $ sudo aptitude update
(...)
> squeez
On 11/12/2010, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> For what little it's worth, I'm seeing exactly the same behavior (on a
> regularly updated 'testing' system).
Thank you Patrick.
On a casual browse saw Cameleon had also responded. FWIW here are the
things requested.
$ sudo aptitude update
[sudo] pass
2010/12/11 shirish शिरीष :
> Hi all,
> Since yesterday or the day before I have been getting an Update
> manager error saying 'updates are half or there is some issue'. I
> update the system using
>
> $ sudo aptitude update
> $ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade -
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:40:11 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>Since yesterday or the day before I have been getting an Update
> manager error saying 'updates are half or there is some issue'. I update
> the system using
>
> $ sudo aptitude update
> $ sudo aptitud
Addition at bottom :-
2010/12/11 shirish शिरीष :
> Hi all,
> Since yesterday or the day before I have been getting an Update
> manager error saying 'updates are half or there is some issue'. I
> update the system using
>
> $ sudo aptitude update
> $ sudo
Hi all,
Since yesterday or the day before I have been getting an Update
manager error saying 'updates are half or there is some issue'. I
update the system using
$ sudo aptitude update
$ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade -y
Of course with the recent discussion all the entries in so
El 2010-12-05 a las 17:27 -0500, John Lindsay escribió:
(resending to the list)
> Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:20:33 -0500, John Lindsay wrote:
>>
>>
>>> All of a sudden I am getting the following message when I click
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:20:33 -0500, John Lindsay wrote:
> All of a sudden I am getting the following message when I click on the
> update manager icon ---
(...)
I always get asked for root password when there are updates available in
the update manager icon. If you get a "key
All of a sudden I am getting the following message when I click on the
update manager icon ---
| enter password for keyring 'default' to unlock
| the application 'gksu' (/usr/bin/gksu) wants access to the keyring
'default' but it is locked
I can do two actions -
I have a fresh install of testing amd64 as of two days ago. Right after
the installation the Update Manager orange star appeared in the gnome
panel notification area. Hovering over it revealed that there was one
upgrade available. But running Update Manager (either from the panel
icon or from
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:18:47 +0200
claudio wrote:
> update manager
>
> E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with
> MergeList
> /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_jaunty_main_binary-i386_Packages,
> E:La lista dei pacchetti o il file di
update manager
E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with
MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_jaunty_main_binary-i386_Packages,
E:La lista dei pacchetti o il file di status non possono essere letti o
aperti.'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 06:07:21PM +0200, claudio wrote:
> E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with
>
> MergeList
> /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_jaunty_main_binary-i386_Packages,
> E:La lista dei pacchetti o il file di status non posso
E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with
MergeList
/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_jaunty_main_binary-i386_Packages,
E:La lista dei pacchetti o il file di status non possono essere letti o
aperti.'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu,14.May.09, 14:03:37, Ken L. Klaser wrote:
> The basic problem is this: I updated Debian Squeeze last night using a
> weekly scheduled Update Manager update (may have been first one since
> dist-upgrade, and since last night's update, Network Manager in Gnome
> (or the di
> I think you are overdoing it. If you have all three version in
> sources.list (which you do) apt will always install the newest version
> possible. For running pure unstable you don't really need any pinning.
But, why aptitude look at my pinning configuration and update-manager n
On Mon,13.Apr.09, 23:53:21, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I decided upgrade my Latitude D630 to unstable from testing.
>
> First, I have googled and having found that the good way was to set
> the Pin-Priority in /etc/apt/preferences, and set /etc/apt/apt.conf to
> unstable, and change sources.li
done! All changes was
done when I ran safe-upgrade! Ok, I am happy here. All work very well.
On the day after, the update-manager run and tell me a lot of upgrades
packages. I simple do all changes. In my first boot after that action
the X didn't goes up.
I ran aptitude safe-upgrade and it
Running unstable, recently update-manager (0.68.debian-7) is unable to
display changelogs for any available updates. Everything else (actualy
updating of package lists and downloading/installing packages) works
fine.
Error appears as:
srcpkg = pkg.sourcePackageName
Unhandled exception in thread
John Lindsay wrote:
> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>>> John
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hi John,
>> Dont use reply to and change the subject of the thread, this does not
>> start a new thread, but goes into the one you are therefore
>> "highjacking". To start a new thread, you have to create a new message.
>> T
John,
I see you are using Thunderbird as am I. Assuming your using the 2
pane view with the preview pane, you can easily click the drop down +
just to the left of the subject to reveal additional header information
and you should see the list's debian-user@lists.debian.org address.. You
shou
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
John
Hi John,
Dont use reply to and change the subject of the thread, this does not start a
new thread, but goes into the one you are therefore "highjacking". To start a
new thread, you have to create a new message.
Thierry
My apologies to the group. I did
>
> John
Hi John,
Dont use reply to and change the subject of the thread, this does not start a
new thread, but goes into the one you are therefore "highjacking". To start a
new thread, you have to create a new message.
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
first: please don't reply to mails to this list if you don't answer to
them. This is annyoing for a lot of people and your mail might go
unnoticed by people who are able to give good answers to your questions.
John Lindsay:
> Is there a problem with the update manager or the sit
Is there a problem with the update manager or the sites from which it
get updates? I haven't seen an update since Friday Feb 13. It tells me
my system is up-to-date but up until last Friday I would get updates 5-6
times a week. Also, whenever the update manager starts up, mplayer
shows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-07-01 18:16, Stackpole, Chris wrote:
> * I don't know the details about it, I just saw the posting about a week
> ago and thought "huh that's interesting" and went on my way. Sorry for
> not keeping the link. I will look for it again and if I f
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 12:06:01PM -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I have the same issue on my login. I run Lenny, but I don't know when new
> updates are available. When I log in as guest, or any other login it gives me
> that orange ball that says there are updates available. I must have turn
>On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
>be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
>box that pops up on my panel that tells me what packages can
>be updated, and it handles the updating.
>
>On a new Lenny install, this is not
On Tue July 1 2008, michael wrote:
> > Yeah, but every day I have minor things to update on the other
> > machine, but nothing on this one. And if I go to Synaptic, as
> > I did a few minutes ago, I learn that I have 122M worth of
> > updates to get through
> >
> > So clearly I think there's so
Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
> be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
> box that pops up on my panel that tells me what packages can
> be updated, and it handles the updating.
>
> On a new Lenn
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:12 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 04:10:13PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:04 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> > > On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
> > > be the Gnom
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 04:10:13PM +0100, michael wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:04 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> > On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
> > be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
> > box that pops up on m
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:04 -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
> On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
> be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
> box that pops up on my panel that tells me what packages can
> be updated, and it handles
On my current Lenny machine, I have something that appears to
be the Gnome update manager running; I regularly get an orange
box that pops up on my panel that tells me what packages can
be updated, and it handles the updating.
On a new Lenny install, this is not present. I do have
something
On Tue February 26 2008, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> ok, I get different output when I do an:
> aptitude update
> apt-get update
> update-manager
>
> I think maybe I am unable to do updates right now. Here is the output of
> each of those commands:
> # aptitude reinstall
ok, I get different output when I do an:
aptitude update
apt-get update
update-manager
I think maybe I am unable to do updates right now. Here is the output of each
of those commands:
# aptitude reinstall update-manager
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:05:31AM -0800, Tim Wescott wrote:
>> Default User wrote:
>>> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
>>> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
>>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:05:31AM -0800, Tim Wescott wrote:
> Default User wrote:
> >I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
> >K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
> >available updates. Among them was l
Hi list
I get this error when trying to do the daily update.
http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/nielsrasmus/Screenshots/photo#5037455125361547874
What is the procedure now, to make it work again ?? Never seen this before :-/
--
/Niels
Registred Linux user #133791
Get counted at http://counter.li.or
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:26:58PM +0100, Niels Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I get this error when trying to do the daily update.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/nielsrasmus/Screenshots/photo#5037455125361547874
>
> What is the procedure now, to make it work again ?? Never seen this before :
Hi list
I get this error when trying to do the daily update.
http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/nielsrasmus/Screenshots/photo#5037455125361547874
What is the procedure now, to make it work again ?? Never seen this before :-/
--
/Niels
Registred Linux user #133791
Get counted at http://counter.li.o
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:44:09 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:34:14 -0500
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > > > sud
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:48:25AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> You were right and I was wrong about directories (I've ceratinly seen
> those 'permission denied' du messages). But since your message
> mentioned files in addition to directories, I carelessly fired off my
> response :).
So in conclusion:
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 10:44 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:34:14 -0500
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > > > sudo
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:06:56AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:34:14 -0500
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > > sudo; they'll run just fine as a normal user.
> >
> > Won't they have a hard ti
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:52:11 +
Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (15/02/07 22:47), Celejar wrote:
> > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > sudo; they'll run just fine as a normal user.
>
> I think you'll find 'du' complains if you run as a nor
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:34:14 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> > Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> > sudo; they'll run just fine as a normal user.
>
> Won't they have a hard time with directories and files that are not
> readable by the normal user?
On (15/02/07 22:47), Celejar wrote:
> Speaking of learning, you shouldn't be running 'du' and 'dpkg -l' with
> sudo; they'll run just fine as a normal user.
I think you'll find 'du' complains if you run as a normal user. The
reason being, it needs to descend into directories to gather usage
infor
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:47:37PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:02:31 -0600
> Default User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Doing "sudo du -BKB /lib64" does indeed show 2793kB in /libc64. Yikes!
> >
> > Doing "sudo dpkg -l libc64*" returns: "No packages found matchi
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:25:16 -0500
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> libc6-amd64 is part of the base system (for no particularly good reason
> but all it uses is some disk space), so you probably already had it
> installed.
Yes, I noticed that shortly after my recent install onto a l
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:02:31 -0600
Default User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Doing "sudo du -BKB /lib64" does indeed show 2793kB in /libc64. Yikes!
>
> Doing "sudo dpkg -l libc64*" returns: "No packages found matching
> libc64*." Since "sudo dpkg -l" returns a list of several hundred (a
Default User wrote:
I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the description
states is a 64-bit library "meant for AMD64 sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Default User wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:03 -0600, Default User wrote:
>> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
>> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
>&
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:03 -0600, Default User wrote:
> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
> available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the description
> states
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
> Default User wrote:
>> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
>> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
>> available updates. Among them was l
Default User wrote:
> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
> available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the description
> states is a 64-bit library "meant
I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the description
states is a 64-bit library "meant for AMD64 systems".
WTF ?!?!
I
89 matches
Mail list logo
