On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:47:26AM +0100, Rob Wilco wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Debian is cool because it is transparent, you can get answers. I now
Hi Rob,
that is one of the founding prinipals of Debian - dont hide stuff from
our user: 'Open' bugs, 'Open' source, etc. If only this point could get
made
Hello,
I wanted to try fastcgi with either apache or lighttp, under etch. And
on my way I learn more on using debian.
As libapache2-mod-fastcgi, lighttpd seemed to be unknown from aptitude,
I turned my browser to the http://packages.debian.org/testing which has
the list.
* no version of li
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 06:10:49AM +, Anton Bretterklieber wrote:
My problem: I did an upgrade to gnome-panel 2-10.1.3. From now on,
gnome-panel doesn't work - "gnome-panel crashed". Also bugbuddy
shows only a blank window, therfore I cannot send a bug-report.
You probably don't need t
On (14/06/05 06:10), Anton Bretterklieber wrote:
>
> Thank you for helping!
> My problem: I did an upgrade to gnome-panel 2-10.1.3. From now on,
> gnome-panel doesn't work - "gnome-panel crashed". Also bugbuddy
> shows only a blank window, therfore I cannot send a bug-report.
>
> thx
> Anton
Thank you for helping!
My problem: I did an upgrade to gnome-panel 2-10.1.3. From now on,
gnome-panel doesn't work - "gnome-panel crashed". Also bugbuddy
shows only a blank window, therfore I cannot send a bug-report.
thx
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Anton Bretterklieber wrote:
> I'm using linux from mepis.org. (a mix of unstable and testing)
> What is the best way to change from unstable back to testing?
> New installation?
Downgrades have no official support. It is too hard of a problem. I
would probably stick where you are unless you have
Anton writes:
> I'm using linux from mepis.org. (a mix of unstable and testing) What is
> the best way to change from unstable back to testing?
Whaty problem are you trying to solve?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:04:23PM +0200, Anton Bretterklieber wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm using linux from mepis.org. (a mix of unstable and testing)
> What is the best way to change from unstable back to testing?
> New installation?
>
Change your sources to point to testing or etch and what a coupl
Hi list,
I'm using linux from mepis.org. (a mix of unstable and testing)
What is the best way to change from unstable back to testing?
New installation?
Thank you
Anton
--
Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie!
Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
time. But I don't know. Anyhow, I would rather be
> using testing. So, is it rather painless to move from unstable to
> testing? And what's the best way to approach that?
>
> Curtis
The good news is that the libc6 libraries are the same version right now
between the two. I
r be using testing. So, is
it rather painless to move from unstable to testing? And what's the best
way to approach that?
Curtis
Change your sources.list to point testing and wait for testing to
catch up with you. Conversely, if you feel comfortable, hunt down
the packages that have lower vers
it rather painless to move from unstable to testing? And what's the
best way to approach that?
Curtis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:57:00AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I did change in source.list unstable to testing: apt-get update
> apt-get dist-upgrade but it didn't do anything. I still can not
> reinstall the evolution nor samba.
>
> They are experimenting with unstable too mu
On Friday 28 May 2004 16:08, Niels L. Ellegaard wrote:
> Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't have this manual 5 apt_preferences installed. When I
> > create the preferences file name, I get: E: Invalid record in
> > preferences file...
>
> My guess is that you have to create the file /e
Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't have this manual 5 apt_preferences installed. When I create
> the preferences file name, I get: E: Invalid record in preferences
> file...
My guess is that you have to create the file /etc/apt/preferences, but
I don't know much about knoppix. Anyway
I don't have this manual 5 apt_preferences installed.
When I create the preferences file name, I get: E: Invalid record in
preferences file...
I've installed my debian from Knoppix, though it shouldn't make much
difference I think.
--
Joseph
> Read about pinning man 5 apt_preferences
>
> You ne
eph wrote:
>
> > I did change in source.list unstable to testing: apt-get update
> > apt-get dist-upgrade but it didn't do anything. I still can not
> > reinstall the evolution nor samba.
>
> What errors do you get?
>
> Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:57:00AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I did change in source.list unstable to testing: apt-get update
> apt-get dist-upgrade but it didn't do anything. I still can not
> reinstall the evolution nor samba.
>
> They are experimenting with unstable too mu
Joseph wrote:
> I did change in source.list unstable to testing: apt-get update
> apt-get dist-upgrade but it didn't do anything. I still can not
> reinstall the evolution nor samba.
What errors do you get?
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
I did change in source.list unstable to testing: apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade but it didn't do anything. I still can not
reinstall the evolution nor samba.
They are experimenting with unstable too much, it is not for me.
--
Joseph
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 09:49, Adam Aube wrote:
>
Joseph wrote:
> Is there a way to downgrade Debian unstable to testing.
You should just be able to change your sources.list from "unstable" to
"testing" and then update and dist-upgrade.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Is there a way to downgrade Debian unstable to testing.
Few days ago I did dist-upgrade and samba is broken, today when I did
dist-upgrade, evolution email was de-installed and is broken now.
--
Joseph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
> Set /etc/apt/preferences to prefer testing over unstable (I have priority
> 700 for testing, 600 for unstable).
I did that first actually, but it doesn't seem to work.
My /etc/apt/preferences has:
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 900
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Prior
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 20.43, Jason Slaughter wrote:
> I have been running a debian unstable machine for a while but I'd like
> to move it to a "testing" machine (with a few unstable packages
> pinned). I know downgrades like this aren't really encouraged, but I
> don't want to downgrade so much
I have been running a debian unstable machine for a while but I'd like to move
it to a "testing" machine (with a few unstable packages pinned). I know
downgrades like this aren't really encouraged, but I don't want to downgrade
so much as run the system I'm running now, and wait for my unstable
unstable to testing rarely happen. However:
gdb (5.3-2 to 6.0-6)
Maintainer: Daniel Jacobowitz
11 days old (needed 10 days)
out of date on hppa: gdb (from 5.3-2)
Not considered
The only reason gdb 6.0-6 isn't in testing is because hppa is having
trouble with it; there's
Hello!
I'm running Debian testing with kernel 2.6.2. When debugging programs with
gdb 5.3, I get the following error messages:
(gdb) r
Starting program:
/home/holgi/sara4-stuff/sas/xmlmodule/test-progs/sqltok+xqueryconv-test/tam_select-test_mg
Error while reading shared library symbols:
Cannot fi
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:48:06PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:30:11AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> > Sorry for the detailed and probably somewhat obvious question, but I
> > switched over to Debian last summer, and am loving it. But this is the
> > first time I've encounte
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:30:11AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> Sorry for the detailed and probably somewhat obvious question, but I
> switched over to Debian last summer, and am loving it. But this is the
> first time I've encountered this type of situation where a testing
> package upgrade (libc
stalled php4.
>
> So I'm a bit lost. Did I mess something up? Or was libc6 or something
> else moved from unstable to testing just a bit early?
>
> Not quite sure whether I should try to back track and get back to libc6
> ver 2.2.5-14.3 so I can get my php4 back, or whether the
Kevin Coyner said:
> But I guess I'm still a bit surprised that this upgrade forced me to
> uninstall php4 (at least the forced uninstall is better than simply
> breaking it). Anyway, I need to run php. Am I correct in assuming that
> if I want to run php4, I'll have to
>
> apt-get -t unstable i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Also sprach Craig Dickson (Sun 09 Mar 02003 at 02:11:51AM -0800):
> Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> > What am I missing?
> >
> > # apt-cache policy libc6
> > libc6:
> > Installed: 2.2.5-14.3
> > Candidate: 2.2.5-14.3
> > Version Table:
> > *** 2
Kevin Coyner wrote:
> O.k., so it seems as if libc6 has moved to testing and that packages.d.o
> is just a bit behind. No problem.
>
> But I guess I'm still a bit surprised that this upgrade forced me to
> uninstall php4 (at least the forced uninstall is better than simply
> breaking it). Anywa
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:11:51AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote..
> Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> > What am I missing?
> >
> > # apt-cache policy libc6
> > libc6:
> > Installed: 2.2.5-14.3
> > Candidate: 2.2.5-14.3
> > Version Table:
>
> Have you done an "apt-get update" today? Even i
Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> What am I missing?
>
> # apt-cache policy libc6
> libc6:
> Installed: 2.2.5-14.3
> Candidate: 2.2.5-14.3
> Version Table:
> *** 2.2.5-14.3 0
> 500 ftp://ftp.debian.org testing/main Packages
> 500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages
>
-14.3.
> >
> > Normally an upgrade like this is good stuff, but this time it caused me
> > some problems, namely it uninstalled php4.
> >
> > So I'm a bit lost. Did I mess something up? Or was libc6 or something
> > else moved from unstable to testing jus
a bit lost. Did I mess something up? Or was libc6 or something
> else moved from unstable to testing just a bit early?
packages.d.o is sometimes a bit behind schedule. If you want to see what
your apt-get sees, do "apt-cache policy ". Here is what I
see right now for libc6 on a t
Kevin Coyner said:
> So I'm a bit lost. Did I mess something up? Or was libc6 or something
> else moved from unstable to testing just a bit early?
someone sent out an announcement to a buncha lists a couple days
ago warning of the new packages I think ..
or maybe that was for gcc..
m unstable to testing just a bit early?
Not quite sure whether I should try to back track and get back to libc6
ver 2.2.5-14.3 so I can get my php4 back, or whether there's another way
of getting this done without going to a totally sid box.
Thanks
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner
mailto: [EMAIL P
On approximately Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 07:49:08AM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
>
> If I want to live my debian life in the middle with 'testing', should I
> create a preferences file? If I don't, and just put entries for testing
> at the top of my sources list, does that mean the apt-get function w
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:26:45AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote..
>
> My preferences file is:
> ===
> Package: *
> Pin: release l=Debian-Security
> Pin-Priority: 750
>
> Package: *
> Pin: release a=testing
> Pin-Priority: 700
>
> Package: *
> Pin: release a=stable
>
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 02:51, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> --Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> (on Wednesday, 11 September 2002, 03:53 PM +0200):
[...]
> > As downgrades are often not properly supported, you'll probably want to
> > do the same (or remove unstable
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 08:08:38AM -0700, Peter Sharp happened to mention:
> Matthew wrote:
> > , so my big question of theday is: how do I
> > downgrade from unstable to testing? I know I
> > can"simply" change my apt.sources list to point at
> > testing,
--Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Wednesday, 11 September 2002, 03:53 PM +0200):
> On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 15:23, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> > so my big question of the
> > day is: how do I downgrade from unstable to testi
Matthew wrote:
> , so my big question of theday is: how do I
> downgrade from unstable to testing? I know I
> can"simply" change my apt.sources list to point at
> testing, but since mostof the software I have
> installed is of a newer version than sarge, won't
my
computer while remaining on the "bleeding edge". I know what tools I
need, and I know that they're available in sarge (and if they aren't,
I've probably compiled 'em by hand anyway!), so my big question of the
day is: how do I downgrade from unstable to testing? I know I
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:51:17PM +0200, christophe barbe wrote:
> I've made a mistake and upgraded a potato box to unstable.
> What I wanted was to upgrade to woody and now I realize that woody == testing.
>
> Is it possible to do a dist-upgrade from unstable to testing.
&g
hards
On Tuesday 10 April 2001 04:51, christophe barbe wrote:
> I've made a mistake and upgraded a potato box to unstable.
> What I wanted was to upgrade to woody and now I realize that woody ==
> testing.
>
> Is it possible to do a dist-upgrade from unstable to testing.
>
I've made a mistake and upgraded a potato box to unstable.
What I wanted was to upgrade to woody and now I realize that woody == testing.
Is it possible to do a dist-upgrade from unstable to testing.
Can expect to not reload all packages (is there a lot of common packages
between testin
To quote Stephen Rueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# Hello!
#
# I made a silly mistake and did an apt-get upgrade and forgot that my
# sources.list was pointing to unstable instead of testing. Then I made
# a even more silly mistake and didn't looked at what apt-get was
# doing. So now I have an testing
Hello!
I made a silly mistake and did an apt-get upgrade and forgot that my
sources.list was pointing to unstable instead of testing. Then I made
a even more silly mistake and didn't looked at what apt-get was
doing. So now I have an testing/unstable-installation that is really
unstable (e.g. fetc
51 matches
Mail list logo
