Re: unstable: udev and the elusive 2.6.12

2005-10-04 Thread Monique Y. Mudama
On 2005-10-04, Jason Martens penned: > Monique Y. Mudama wrote: > >> >>Hrm. I guess I haven't been keeping up. I assume this is to make >>it easier to, say, have debian running with both linux and bsd, etc? >> > That is correct. See this bug: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=32

Re: unstable: udev and the elusive 2.6.12

2005-10-04 Thread Jason Martens
Monique Y. Mudama wrote: On 2005-10-03, Antony Gelberg penned: Monique Y. Mudama wrote: I must be missing something here ... Yep. Er, I just noticed an earlier post referring to linux-source-2.6.12 is this a new naming convention? Yep. Hrm. I guess

Re: unstable: udev and the elusive 2.6.12

2005-10-03 Thread Monique Y. Mudama
On 2005-10-03, Antony Gelberg penned: > Monique Y. Mudama wrote: >> I must be missing something here ... > > Yep. > >> Er, I just noticed an earlier post referring to linux-source-2.6.12 >> is this a new naming convention? > > Yep. > Hrm. I guess I haven't been keeping up. I assume this is

unstable: udev and the elusive 2.6.12

2005-10-03 Thread Monique Y. Mudama
I must be missing something here ... I tried to install the latest udev, and it told me I needed kernel 2.6.12. No big; I'm already running 2.6.10. So ... home:/etc/apt# aptitude search kernel-source-2.6 v kernel-source-2.6 v kernel-source-2.6.0-test2 v kernel-source-2.6.0-test4 v kerne