Cheryl Homiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, be careful if you are trying to upgrade from testing to unstable.
> I tried it last night and got stuck in some kind of conflict between coreutils
> and fileutils, where you were somehow going to have to temporarily remove
> fileutils because of t
Well, be careful if you are trying to upgrade from testing to unstable.
I tried it last night and got stuck in some kind of conflict between coreutils
and fileutils, where you were somehow going to have to temporarily remove
fileutils because of the conflict. I decided to stick with testing from n
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:25:19AM -0700, Charles Baker wrote:
> --- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > glibc is pretty much fixed, although you'll have a temporary problem
> > upgrading to the current libc6/locales combination because they're
> > out of sync on i386. (Will be fixed this
--- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:46:45PM -0700, Charles
> Baker wrote:
> > Okay I asked this question a few weeks ago and got
> the above warning
> > about Python, Perl and glibc. Can anyone tell me
> if these issues been
> > resoloved yet? I see few Python
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:46:45PM -0700, Charles Baker wrote:
> Okay I asked this question a few weeks ago and got the above warning
> about Python, Perl and glibc. Can anyone tell me if these issues been
> resoloved yet? I see few Python bugs, lots of Perl bugs and only a few
> glibc bugs. What'
--- Corrin Lakeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:56, Charles Baker wrote:
> > I'm seeing some packages in unstable that I would
> > really like, for instance tomcat 4.1.9. But I'm
> > wondering just how unstable is unstable, say on a
> > scale of 1 - 10 with 10 being you mu
6 matches
Mail list logo
