Re: Re: Systemd with chroot and under unprivileged user

2019-05-07 Thread Peter Viskup
Opened bug report at mainstream. https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/12498 On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:17 PM Peter Viskup wrote: > It is related to systemd processing of chroot, as with commenting the User > setting, the service start up successfully. > > Want to mimic the startup of the ser

Re: Re: Systemd with chroot and under unprivileged user

2019-05-07 Thread Peter Viskup
It is related to systemd processing of chroot, as with commenting the User setting, the service start up successfully. Want to mimic the startup of the service in init script on Debian8 (which is running fine): ~# start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile "/srv/inst/var/run/rsyslogd.pid" --chuid

Re: Systemd with chroot and under unprivileged user

2019-05-07 Thread tomas
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 11:08:38AM +0200, Peter Viskup wrote: > Running Debian9 with systemd 241-3~bpo9+1 from backports. > Having trouble to start rsyslog service in chroot jail using the systemd > service file with RootDirectory and User settings. > Setting AmbientCapabilities=CAP_SYS_CHROOT does

Systemd with chroot and under unprivileged user

2019-05-07 Thread Peter Viskup
Running Debian9 with systemd 241-3~bpo9+1 from backports. Having trouble to start rsyslog service in chroot jail using the systemd service file with RootDirectory and User settings. Setting AmbientCapabilities=CAP_SYS_CHROOT does not help and still getting following errors: rsyslog-chroot@inst.se

Reading /proc/kmsg as a Unprivileged User

2007-05-01 Thread Matt Miller
x27;m root. I'm running my logging daemon as an unprivileged user, and my log files are missing kernel messages. My Initial research mentioned SELinux, and discussed tweaking my security policies, but I'm thinking that SELinux is not even turned on. I'm running etch, and I've

Re: unprivileged user

2003-08-26 Thread Robert Storey
> > Sometime back somebody told me there was a way to add a user account > > where the user was very limited in what he could do. As I remember, the > > user would not even be able to change directories. > > > Try googling for "chroot user" > > Rgds > > Rus Thanks Rus. It turns out that what

Re: unprivileged user

2003-08-25 Thread Rus Foster
> Dear All, > > Sometime back somebody told me there was a way to add a user account > where the user was very limited in what he could do. As I remember, the > user would not even be able to change directories. Try googling for "chroot user" Rgds Rus -- w: http://www.jvds.com | Linux + Free

unprivileged user

2003-08-25 Thread Robert Storey
n up what I was looking for. I wondering if anyone could enlighten me. Note that I'm not sure "unprivileged user" is the correct name for this type of account, so if I've got the terminology wrong, please let me know. regards, Robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT