On Friday, 29 Dec 2017 at 11:27, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
[...]
> Syncthing appears to be an extremely powerful file synchronization tool,
[...]
> I've decided to give up on Syncthing, and revert to Unison, which means
> upgrading my server, but hey, what are holidays for?
Thanks for the updat
On 13/12/17 17:49, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 13/12/17 17:29, Anders Andersson wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Tony van der Hoff
>> wrote:
>>> On 13/12/17 15:40, Curt wrote:
Sorry for butting in once again, but you do have unison-all installed,
the metapackage which allows
On 13/12/17 17:29, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Tony van der Hoff
> wrote:
>> On 13/12/17 15:40, Curt wrote:
>>> Sorry for butting in once again, but you do have unison-all installed,
>>> the metapackage which allows specifically for the -addversionno "kludge" by
>>>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 13/12/17 15:40, Curt wrote:
>> Sorry for butting in once again, but you do have unison-all installed,
>> the metapackage which allows specifically for the -addversionno "kludge" by
>> bringing in versions 2.32 and 2.40 as per the follo
On 13/12/17 15:40, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-12-13, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> It seems the unison developers are a little careless with compatibility
>> issues. This situation has arisen previously, then overcome by unison-all.
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestion of syncthing; I'll give that a go...
>
On 2017-12-13, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>
> It seems the unison developers are a little careless with compatibility
> issues. This situation has arisen previously, then overcome by unison-all.
>
> Thanks for your suggestion of syncthing; I'll give that a go...
Sorry for butting in once again, bu
On 13/12/17 13:35, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 Dec 2017 at 12:49, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> unison is a fantastic tool but these incompatibilities make it
> incredibly frustrating to use every now and again.
>
> You could consider the following options:
>
> 1. build unison y
On Wednesday, 13 Dec 2017 at 12:49, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
[...]
> The server is running Jessie, the repository does not contain 2.48.
> There appears to be no backport.
> The client is running Stretch. Its repository does not contain anything
> other than 2.48.
>
>>From what I can see froom go
On 12/12/17 11:58, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Monday, 11 Dec 2017 at 10:36, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> No:
>>
>> tony@tony-lx:~$ unison -addversionno tony
>> Contacting server...
>> bash: unison-2.48: command not found
> But you do need to install the various versions you may to use on t
On 12 December 2017 at 21:16, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 12/12/17 08:50, Curt wrote:
>>
>> * workaroundable via symlink version number truncation bug
>>
> Thanks for your reply, Curt, but we appear to speak different languages ;)
>
> WVSVNTB?
The mysterious "WVSVNTB" might be a reference to th
On 2017-12-12, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>> tony@tony-lx:~$ unison -addversionno tony
>>> Contacting server...
>>> bash: unison-2.48: command not found
>>> Fatal error: Lost connection with the server
>>>
>>>
>> * workaroundable via symlink version number truncation bug
>>
> Thanks for your reply
On Monday, 11 Dec 2017 at 10:36, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
[...]
> No:
>
> tony@tony-lx:~$ unison -addversionno tony
> Contacting server...
> bash: unison-2.48: command not found
But you do need to install the various versions you may to use on the
server. Then the client can request to use the
On 12/12/17 08:50, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-12-11, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> On 10/12/17 19:40, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 10 Dec 2017 at 12:25, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
In the passt, I've always worked round this by installing the lower
version on my desktop and
On 2017-12-11, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 10/12/17 19:40, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> On Sunday, 10 Dec 2017 at 12:25, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> In the passt, I've always worked round this by installing the lower
>>> version on my desktop and adjusted the links. This appears no lng
On 10/12/17 19:40, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 Dec 2017 at 12:25, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> In the passt, I've always worked round this by installing the lower
>> version on my desktop and adjusted the links. This appears no lnger to
>> be possible.
>>
>> Does anyone know how
On Sunday, 10 Dec 2017 at 12:25, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
[...]
> In the passt, I've always worked round this by installing the lower
> version on my desktop and adjusted the links. This appears no lnger to
> be possible.
>
> Does anyone know how to get round this? (I've no immediate intention to
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 12:25:42 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For years I've been using unison to keep common files amongst my various
> systems.
>
> I now find that stretch provides version 2.48, whereas Jessie provided
> 2.40, and they are not compatible. My server, which still runs J
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 12:25:42 +
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For years I've been using unison to keep common files amongst my
> various systems.
>
> I now find that stretch provides version 2.48, whereas Jessie provided
> 2.40, and they are not compatible. My server, which still runs J
Hi,
For years I've been using unison to keep common files amongst my various
systems.
I now find that stretch provides version 2.48, whereas Jessie provided
2.40, and they are not compatible. My server, which still runs Jessie,
will therefore not accept connections from my desktop box.
In the pa
19 matches
Mail list logo
