Re: umsdos under 2.6

2005-12-12 Thread Martin Lefebvre
On 12/12/05, Martin Lefebvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well if -t vfat gives you the same error, you can try redoing the > filesystem on the USB drive. I've seen that happen when the device is > not properly unmounted, or if something bad happened to it (mine was > dropped... still works, but

Re: umsdos under 2.6

2005-12-12 Thread Martin Lefebvre
On 12/12/05, Iñaki Silanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks, Martin. I mention in my post that I have tried "-t msdos" and it > doesn't work. "-t vfat" gives the very same error: > > Bart:~# mount /dev/autousb /mnt/usb/ -t msdos > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/autous

Re: umsdos under 2.6

2005-12-12 Thread Iñaki Silanes
Martin Lefebvre wrote: > On 12/9/05, Iñaki Silanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have a USB pendrive formatted as umsdos (I think), and I just can't >> mount it with my Debian Etch 2.6 kernel machine. >> > > Try vfat... works with my 2 usbdrives Thanks, Martin. I mention in my po

Re: umsdos under 2.6

2005-12-09 Thread Martin Lefebvre
On 12/9/05, Iñaki Silanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a USB pendrive formatted as umsdos (I think), and I just can't mount > it with my Debian Etch 2.6 kernel machine. > Try vfat... works with my 2 usbdrives -- Martin Lefebvre eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: https://sigterm.hom

umsdos under 2.6

2005-12-09 Thread Iñaki Silanes
Hi all, I have a USB pendrive formatted as umsdos (I think), and I just can't mount it with my Debian Etch 2.6 kernel machine. The pendrive mounts flawlessly under a Slakware 2.4 kernel machine, with a fstab entry of: /dev/sda1 /mnt/flash autonoauto,user 0 0 So, "auto" for fs. I