On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:08:59 -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:40:30 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
>
>> I just noticed that in bash "ulimit -u" is the same as ash's
>> "ulimit -p", while bash has another meaning for "ulimit -p" ... This
>> makes writing scripts quite difficult
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:40:30 +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> I just noticed that in bash "ulimit -u" is the same as ash's
> "ulimit -p", while bash has another meaning for "ulimit -p" ... This
> makes writing scripts quite difficult, I'd say you cannot then use
> ulimit in /bin/sh scripts, only
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:40:30PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> I just noticed that in bash "ulimit -u" is the same as ash's
> "ulimit -p", while bash has another meaning for "ulimit -p" ... This
> makes writing scripts quite difficult, I'd say you cannot then use
> ulimit in /bin/sh scripts,
I just noticed that in bash "ulimit -u" is the same as ash's
"ulimit -p", while bash has another meaning for "ulimit -p" ... This
makes writing scripts quite difficult, I'd say you cannot then use
ulimit in /bin/sh scripts, only in scripts specifically for bash or
ash.
Just a thought, posted in ca
4 matches
Mail list logo